Astronomy and Planetary Science Thread

Meteorite hunters have tracked down fragments from an asteroid that struck the Earth over Berlin last week and it appears to be “very rare.”

Fragments of the small asteroid dubbed 2024 BX1 burned up in the skies above Berlin into a harmless fireball last Sunday merely two hours after it was discovered by astronomers.



Experts, including meteor scientist Peter Jenniskens, found the rock fragments to be “very rare” as they resemble rocks found on the Earth.

 
Interesting find Deltafan, I was wondering if not when we would discover a super Earth in the habitable zone otherwise the 'Goldilocks' zone and to have a Earth type planet as a companion. It would be the Billion Dollar question whether both planets have life on the surface.
 
The James Webb Space Telescope has detected two alien planets orbiting white dwarfs, the collapsed husks of once-mighty stars. The discovery offers a hint of what our solar system will look like after the sun's eventual demise.


Related paper:

 
A surprisingly youthful ocean within Mimas, a tiny moon of Saturn, has big implications for the solar system’s history—and for finding life beyond Earth



To find the ocean of Mimas, the study’s authors focused less on the moon’s surface detail and more on its motion, finding a telltale drift in its orbit via archival data from the Cassini spacecraft, which surveyed the Saturnian system for 13 years before concluding its mission in 2017. Some of Mimas’s drift, the researchers say, can only be explained if the layer-cake structure of the moon itself features an icy shell that slides around on top of a liquid-water ocean.



“The implications for this are just enormous,” says Carly Howett, a planetary scientist at the University of Oxford, who was not involved with the new study. The first is that you shouldn’t judge a moon by its cover—oceans may grace other seemingly inert icy orbs, such as several satellites of Uranus and Neptune, scarcely explored planets that, like Saturn, lie in the outer solar system. The second implication is that icy-moon oceans need not be ancient and enduring; some could be incipient, transient seas.


Related paper:

 
And here I was thinking it was dry...I suppose water would allow a wider crater... whatever made that dent could have easily turned it into Miranda otherwise.

Plasma model

Astronomy news

space travel
 
Last edited:
Could a Kilonova Kill: A Threat Assessment

Abstract
Binary neutron star mergers produce high-energy emissions from several physically different sources, including a gamma-ray burst (GRB) and its afterglow, a kilonova (KN), and, at late times, a remnant many parsecs in size. Ionizing radiation from these sources can be dangerous for life on Earth-like planets when located too close. Work to date has explored the substantial danger posed by the GRB to on-axis observers; here we focus instead on the potential threats posed to nearby off-axis observers. Our analysis is based largely on observations of the GW170817/GRB 170817A multi-messenger event, as well as theoretical predictions. For baseline KN parameters, we find that the X-ray emission from the afterglow may be lethal out to ∼1 pc and the off-axis gamma-ray emission may threaten a range out to ∼4 pc, whereas the greatest threat comes years after the explosion, from the cosmic rays accelerated by the KN blast, which can be lethal out to distances up to ∼11 pc. The distances quoted here are typical, but the values have significant uncertainties and depend on the viewing angle, ejected mass, and explosion energy in ways we quantify. Assessing the overall threat to Earth-like planets, KNe have a similar kill distance to supernovae, but are far less common. However, our results rely on the scant available KN data, and multi-messenger observations will clarify the danger posed by such events.

 
The pendulum swings away from habitable planets around M dwarfs. Next month it may swing back again.


Quite a lively - and thankfully literate - discussion in the comments section.

The papers linked in the blog:


The first thermal emission measurements obtained with JWST favor low-density-atmosphere or bare-rock scenarios for the two inner planets. The detection of dense secondary atmospheres around the five outer planets could be achieved by transit transmission spectroscopy with JWST, but this will require addressing the critical problem of stellar contamination with more theoretical and observational work.


[It] is unlikely that any significant atmosphere could survive for any extended amount of time around any of the TRAPPIST-1 planets. The assumptions used here allow us to generalise the results, and we conclude that the results tentatively indicate that this conclusion applies to all Earth-like planets in the habitable zones of low-mass M dwarfs.

On the third hand, as pointed out by Adam Crowl in the comments for the Centauri Dreams post:


We find that the stellar wind stripping that is expected to occur on TRAPPIST-1c over its lifetime can only remove up to ∼16 bar of CO2, less than the modern CO2 inventory of either Earth or Venus.

Therefore, we infer that TRAPPIST-1c either formed volatile-poor, as compared to Earth and Venus, or lost a substantial amount of CO2 during an early phase of hydrodynamic hydrogen escape. Finally, we scale our results for the other TRAPPIST-1 planets, finding that the more distant TRAPPIST-1 planets may readily retain atmospheres.


As mentioned in the studies above, only the atmospheres or lack of atmospheres on b and c have been observed yet. The five outer planets, which include up to three candidates for habitability, are yet to be studied in the same terms. Yet, I emphasise.

However, from Wikipedia, which I think is worth noting:


It is estimated to be 7.6 billion years old, making it older than the Solar System.

What that implies is that the planets themselves are very old and plate tectonics may have shut down long ago on an earth-like world, which has significant (bad) implications for habitability.

However, tidal heating may substitute for that (from 2019 and 2020, before the most recent observations of b and c):


We show that TRAPPIST-1d and e can avoid entering a runaway greenhouse state. Planet e is the most likely to support a habitable environment, with Earth-like surface temperatures and possibly liquid water oceans. Planet d also avoids a runaway greenhouse, if its surface reflectance is at least as high as that of the Earth. Planets b and c, closer to the star, have heat fluxes high enough to trigger a runaway greenhouse and support volcanism on the surfaces of their rock layers, rendering them too warm for life. Planets f, g, and h are too far from the star to experience significant tidal heating, and likely have solid ice surfaces with possible subsurface liquid water oceans.


Using a Maxwell viscoelastic rheology, we computed the tidal response of the planets using the volume-weighted average of the viscosities and rigidities of the metal, rock, high-pressure ice, and liquid water/ice I layers. After determining the possible interior structures, we computed the heat flux due to stellar irradiation and tidal heating for the inner four planets (Barr et al. 2018, Dobos et al. 2019). We found that planet e is the most likely to support a habitable environment, with Earth-like surface temperatures and possibly liquid water oceans. Planet d also avoids a runaway greenhouse state (in which it would irreversibly lose all of its surface water content), if its surface reflectance is at least as high as that of the Earth. Planets b and c have heat fluxes high enough to trigger a runaway greenhouse and to support volcanism on the surfaces of their rock layers. Planets f, g, and h do not experience significant tidal heating arising from the star, and likely have solid ice surfaces with possible subsurface liquid water oceans.

This concerns tidal heating arising from the star, not effects that the planets have on each other. Tentatively, it appears that those effects are minor.


Do you see why I mentioned a pendulum?

Anyway, d and e look like the best candidates for further observations to determine habitability.
 
Last edited:
By the way, the latest observations of Proxima b suggest that it is somewhat colder than previously thought, though rather being dry and barren, it and a number of other exoplanets may be 'super-Europas.' Trappist-1f is mentioned too.

This is actually good news, because if an atmosphere is stripped away by the extremely high UV and X-ray flux and megaflares typical of M dwarfs, an ice shell would protect a warm ocean.



Ignore the 'Radware' bit. The link to the article is fine.

Estimated internal heating rates from tidal and radiogenic sources are large enough that all planets in our study may harbor subsurface oceans, and their geological activity rates are likely to exceed the geological activity rates on Jupiter's moon Europa. Several planets are likely to experience enhanced volcanic activity rates that exceed that of Io. Owing to their relatively thin ice shells and high rates of internal heating, Proxima Cen b and LHS 1140 b are the most favorable candidates for telescopic detection of explosive, tidally driven cryovolcanism. Estimates for thin ice shells on Proxima Cen b, LHS 1140 b, Trappist-1f, and several Kepler planets suggest that any H2O vented into space during explosive cryovolcanic eruptions on these worlds could be sourced directly from their subsurface oceans.
 
Last edited:
Targets for the Habitable Worlds Observatory (JWST successor), with a pencilled launch date sometime in the 2040s. It will use a coronagraph to image 25 earth-like planets in the habitable zones of their stars.


Paywalled, but according to my dead tree edition, 164 candidate stars within 100 light years have been selected for attention... not so much planning stage yet but more than just brainstorming. They include Tau Ceti (12 ly, multiple planets) and 82 G Eridani (20 ly, at least 3 super-earths or mini-Neptunes).

102 of the stars are binaries or multiples, and 33 have have extensive debris discs which may interfere with observations.

Anyway, here's a preprint:


We discuss our catalog in the context of planet habitability and draw attention to key gaps in our knowledge where precursor science can help to inform HWO mission design trade studies in the near future. Notably, only 33 of the 164 stars in our sample have reliable space-based UV measurements, and only 40 have a mid-IR measurement. We also find that phosphorus, a bio-essential element, has only been measured in 11 of these stars, motivating future abundance surveys.
 
Meanwhile, if you were wondering about Hycean worlds, not so good news. 'Hycean' is a portmanteau of 'hydrogen' and 'ocean', denoting a watery ocean world with a thick hydrogen atmosphere. They could theoretically be habitable far beyond the usual habitable zone, which has caused some excitement.

However, a water ocean under a thick hydrogen atmosphere and a magma ocean under a thick hydrogen atmosphere might look very similar to an observer using current techniques.


The researchers investigated how it would affect the planet’s atmospheric chemistry if these oceans were made of magma rather than water, which would be consistent with the hotter predicted temperatures. They found that this matched the JWST observations just as well as water oceans.

“These two radically different regimes look very similar,” says Shorttle. “It makes the detection of habitable conditions on a super Earth or sub-Neptune-sized planet more complicated than we might have hoped.”



Ignore the 'Radware' bit. The link to the article is fine.

'Habitable' of course means 'something might be able live there... but not necessarily us.' Think of something that would appear to us to be an aquatic extremophile. Actually, 'habitable zone' just means 'if you teleported the Earth there, we wouldn't all die right away.'

As someone who thinks that any fool can be uncomfortable and who only leaves his comfort zone to enter his luxury zone, the idea of an environment where you can't live without technological assistance isn't so off-putting. If you can't go camping on Proxima b, go glamping instead. Nudism isn't a popular lifestyle among the Inuit, Saami, etc., but they seem happy enough living above the Arctic circle.
 
Last edited:
Stars that pass by our solar system have altered the long-term orbital evolution of planets, including Earth, and, by extension, modified our climate.


Simulation for star HD7977 that is believed past by 2.8 million years ago:

View: https://youtu.be/FlmoWuX-H3s


Related paper:

 
A team co-led by Southwest Research Institute found evidence for hydrothermal or metamorphic activity within the icy dwarf planets Eris and Makemake, located in the Kuiper Belt. Methane detected on their surfaces has the tell-tale signs of warm or even hot geochemistry in their rocky cores, which is markedly different than the signature of methane from a comet.



”After the New Horizons flyby of the Pluto system, and with this discovery, the Kuiper Belt is turning out to be much more alive in terms of hosting dynamic worlds than we would have imagined," said Glein. "It's not too early to start thinking about sending a spacecraft to fly by another one of these bodies to place the JWST data into a geologic context. I believe that we will be stunned by the wonders that await."


Related paper:

 
A new paper from Mike Brown and colleagues has further narrowed down where planet nine of it does exist could be hiding.

Dr. Mike Brown, who is a Richard and Barbara Rosenberg Professor of Astronomy at Caltech and lead author of the study, tells Universe Today, “We are continuing to try to systematically cover all of the regions of the sky where we predict Planet Nine to be. Using data from Pan-STARRS allowed us to cover the largest region to date.”



In the end, the team narrowed down possible locations of Planet Nine by eliminating approximately 78 percent of possible locations that were calculated from previous studies. Additionally, the researchers also provided new estimates for the approximate semimajor axis (measured in astronomical units (AU)) and Earth-mass size of Planet Nine at 500 and 6.6, respectively. So, what are the most significant results from this study, and what follow-up studies are currently being conducted or planned?

“While I would love to say that the most significant result was finding Planet Nine, we didn’t,” Dr. Brown tells Universe Today. “So instead, it means that we have significantly narrowed the search area. We’ve now surveyed approximately 80% of the regions where we think Planet Nine might be.”



Dr. Brown tells Universe Today, “This would be the 5th largest planet of our solar system and the only one with a mass between Earth and Uranus. Such planets are common around other stars, and we would suddenly have a chance to study one in our own solar system.”


Here’s the paper:

 
Finally looks like we will find the rather mysterious Planet Nine sooner rather than later.
 
Our Milky Way Galaxy may be as much as two billion years older than currently thought, the principal investigator of a unique multi-year project to simulate the galaxy’s origin and evolution, told me here in Santiago. In fact, our own 10-billion-year-old Milky Way may contain ancient stars that predate the galaxy and that are as old as the cosmos itself.

A collaboration between Argentina, Chile and Spain called CIELO: Chemo-dynamical Properties of Galaxies and the Cosmic Web ("cielo" is “sky" in Spanish), the team’s research predates the covid pandemic and will continue for at least another five years.

 
Interesting Flyaway our home Galaxy may be Two Billion years older than thought, so that is my Insiders Guide to the Galaxy book by William H. Waller out of date, plus all the current text books on the Galaxy will have to be rewritten if the experiments data holds true when it is continues for a further five years. Something to keep an eye on I would think.
 
NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope has found the best evidence yet for emission from a neutron star at the site of a recently observed supernova. The supernova, known as SN 1987A, was a core-collapse supernova, meaning the compacted remains at its core formed either a neutron star or a black hole. Evidence for such a compact object has long been sought, and while indirect evidence for the presence of a neutron star has previously been found, this is the first time that the effects of high-energy emission from the probable young neutron star have been detected.

 
Odd…in both SPACE 1999 and Star Trek, you heard about “black stars”…misnomer no more…if it were mirror matter?

In the news:
 
Last edited:
The Solar System has some new lunar members—the first new moon of Uranus discovered in more than 20 years, and likely the smallest, as well as two new moons of Neptune, one of which is the faintest moon ever discovered by ground-based telescopes. The discoveries were announced today by the International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center.



All of the new Uranian and Neptunian moons have distant, eccentric, and inclined orbits that suggests they were captured by the gravity of these planets during or shortly after Uranus and Neptune formed from the ring of dust and debris that surrounded our Sun in its infancy. All of the giant planets in our Solar System have similar configurations for their outer moons, regardless of their size or the process by which they formed.

 
Odd…in both SPACE 1999 and Star Trek, you heard about “black stars”…misnomer no more…if it were mirror matter?
I think that was the theoretical name for objects that were eventually discovered to be black holes.
 
Astronomers have spotted a star with a dark metallic “scar” on its surface, thought to be the imprint of a doomed planetary fragment that came too close to its host.
The white dwarf star, called WD 0816-310, is a dense, Earth-sized remnant of a star about 63 light years away that would have been similar to our sun in its lifetime. Observations revealed a concentrated patch of metals on its surface, which appear to be the remnants of an ingested chunk of planet or an asteroid.


Related paper:

 
A scar... hanging out with the wrong crowd I see.

In the news

Crimes in space?
 
Last edited:
It’s looking increasingly likely this is dead system of planets.

Scientists have discovered that a potentially habitable planet is having its atmosphere stripped, a process that may eventually render the world, Trappist-1e, inhospitable to life. The stripping appears to be caused by electric currents created as the planet races around its red dwarf host star.
 
Things are not looking good for any life on the Trappist-1 Earthlikes. I wanted the Trappist-1 planets to have life on them but it now looks like it is going to be impossible.
 
There are 200 billion stars in the Milky Way, and statistics says something like 50% of them may have planets. Plus all the "orphans" planets not tied to a star.
 
It’s looking increasingly likely this is dead system of planets.


The Space.com article is a bit misleading. It says that the planet has been 'caught' having its atmosphere stripped and 'Scientists have discovered that a potentially habitable planet is having its atmosphere stripped', implying direct observational evidence of this happening, whereas the paper presents purely theoretical modelling. I'm certainly not disputing the science but it only considers one factor at play.

So far, we only have observations of planets b and c, and they're not absolutely certain.
 
A more complete report on the recent update in the hunt for the supposed planet nine in the Solar System. This is sounding more like the non-existent planet Vulcan every time we get these negative updates from Mike Brown.

 
An exciting discovery could shed some light on how Earth got its water.

New observations of a disk of dust and gas circling a baby star have revealed a large amount of water vapor, at the exact location where baby planets might be starting to form.

View: https://youtu.be/YVfPKdginYU



Related paper:

 
An interesting discovery Flyaway, I had always wondered where the Earth got its water from in the ealy years of the solar system.
 
Further on the habitability or otherwise of planets in M-dward systems, Paul Gilster has some observations (not that sort).


Theory is always malleable and yields to observation which, in turn, re-energizes theory. Michaël Gillon (University of Liége), who is among other things the discoverer of the TRAPPIST-1 system, made this point in a recent email exchange. He was responding to my article What We Know Now about TRAPPIST-1 (and what we don’t) with a much needed note of caution. The question of whether rocky planets orbiting M-dwarf stars can retain atmospheres is one of the hottest controversies going. Observations, says Gillon, will tell the tale, not theory, no matter how elegant the latter.

The authors point out that the protoplanets that built up the early Earth were exposed to a young Sun that was blasting our planet with X-rays, ultraviolet and stellar wind conditions that may equal, and perhaps surpass, what occurred at Proxima b.

The authors point out, then, that geochemical evidence alone shows us no signs of significant depletion of Earth’s inventory of volatiles, which can lead to the possibility that volatile loss was extremely limited under conditions that some of our models would suggest should deplete them radically.


The above is in reference to an older paper, which he regards as still very relevant. As for the recent one mentioned above, on other mechanisms of atmosphere stripping,

Thus energy output, stellar wind and magnetic field changes all factor into a model that suggests atmospheric escape and, like other models, is in need of confirmation with future instrumentation. We can only turn to such observation to begin to understand how diverse theories mesh. I think all the scientists involved in the study of planetary atmospheres around M-dwarfs would agree with this. And headlines in the popular media announcing barren rocks at TRAPPIST-1 are making ongoing investigations into settled science.

I think Flyaway's post #998 might be relevant too.
 

Attachments

  • The habitability of Proxima Centauri b aa29576-16.pdf
    1.4 MB · Views: 0
  • Heating of the Atmospheres of Short-orbit Exoplanets by Their Rapid OrbitalMotion through an E...pdf
    814 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom