Artemis isn't even shifting the needle compared to 1960s spaceflight principles
That may not be the manner of lack it might feel like at first glance:
after all,
aircraft haven't shifted the needle from 1910s aerodynamic principles, they still require wings, require production of lift, require propulsion machinery which itself moves air, just like aircraft did in 1910.
and
automobiles haven't shifted the needle from 1880s automotive principles, they still require wheels, tires/tyres, roads, power sources, infrastructure to supply and maintain those power sources. Yeah yeah, so there are drivererless cars, big whoopee, show me the driverless cars which have no wheels, require no roads, and do not have a powersource which needs periodic replenishing.
and
then there are the boats and ships which still rely on principles which are thousands of years old, yeah, yeah, yeah, we've changed propulsion from oars to sails to nuclear-electric plants turning screw propellors, and we've advanced construction material from wood to metal to synthetic composites, so?, they still get designed with displacement and wetted area and load limits and ... and ...; show me a ship which has no surfaces in contact with the water and therefore no frictional drag and now we'll have something to talk about.
 
These days the biggest thing going for it is that it isn’t Elon’s rocket. Some otherwise red states that are SLS states may be a stumbling block…tax dollars can go to a union rocket-or a union buster’s rocket…with ties to China…No Pinkerton fan here.

Another’s view on Starship

Alpaca on the other hand, is perhaps getting a second look
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Qu9KkCra4L0
 
Last edited:
Following two failures by Intuitive Machines due to elementary design mistakes that SpaceX is determined to repeat, compounded by extreme overdesign, Dynetics' Alpaca does seem like a good option for the first return to the Moon missions - or so the Angry Astronaut says.

IIRC, Dynetics was rejected because Alpaca couldn't meet the mass requirements. OTOH, it certainly addresses the lack of smooth flat bowling greens on the moon.

Thoughts?

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qu9KkCra4L0&t=244s&ab_channel=TheAngryAstronaut
 
ALPACA such a ridiculous accronym (and hairdo, too ROTFL)

1280px-Alpaca_-_panoramio_%28977%29.jpg
 
Thoughts?

"Orion is a mature spacecraft". Lost myself at that point.

So this narrator reckons Dynetics can go from PowerPoint to an operational Lunar lander by 2028? A company that hasn't delivered any spacecraft except participating in FASTSAT?

The design does look practical and they've been working on it for at least five years, but still...
 
At Space News a year or two back, one Disqus post had it that some of their talent left because their project proposals kept getting turned down.

That’s worrisome…you want to keep assets lively and engaged.
 
Philip Sloss has another update for SLS, Orion and Artemis II:


The release of the Artemis II mission crew patch is another event symbolizing the coming launch, but will imagery like the recent SLS Core Stage to Booster mate or the patch change plans for the future of Artemis?
A few days before the patch was made public, another news story added weight to the rumors that President Trump and Elon Musk are looking at terminating SLS, freeing Musk from his Artemis lunar lander obligations, and pivoting to Musk's long-time goal of Mars. NASA Administrator nominee Jared Isaacman was said to be onboard with Trump and Musk's plans; he'll get a chance to speak to that in his confirmation hearing that was scheduled for April 9.
I'll go over that, the arrival of the Gateway HALO module in the U.S., and more Artemis II information that Exploration Ground Systems provided to the media at an event in San Diego after their landing and recovery training exercise.Imagery is courtesy of NASA, except where noted.
00:00 Intro
01:46 WSJ story adds weight to rumors that Trump/Musk want to cancel SLS or all or Artemis
03:39 Jared Isaacman's NASA Administrator nomination hearing scheduled for April 9th
04:34 Artemis II astronauts unveil their mission patch
06:03 URT-12 media event held in San Diego after EGS landing and recovery certification
14:13 Gateway HALO module frame arrives in Phoenix from Turin for outfitting to become a spacecraft
16:29 Thanks for watching!
 
Philip Sloss has uploaded his quarterly report for Artemis and the SLS:


Reviewing the work completed by NASA and its Artemis partners during the first quarter of 2025 on preparations and planning for the Artemis II, III, and IV missions.
Imagery is courtesy of NASA, except where noted.
00:00 Intro
00:20 Quarter in review: three major themes
03:54 Artemis II status and outlook
08:00 Artemis III status and (cloudy) outlook
23:52 Artemis IV status and outlook
35:02 Artemis V and beyond
37:15 Thanks for watching!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom