That so fat and ugly
Looking at Type 055, big enough to carry multiple hypersonic missile, yet still elegant and stealthy
c944a609-54bf-4776-a13c-1ab321439c09_88c9dae6.jpg
 
Any idea what is behind the latest delay? It sure seems that we've forgotten how to design ships.
Mix of several things, mostly Congress and lack of resources.

Going back to the late 2000s, the Navy was marketing both Zumwalt and CG(X) as a similar product, sharing common machinery, electronics, hull, powerplant, etc. So when Congress learned how much the Zumwalt program had ballooned in price (mostly due to Congressional mismanagement and reduced hull orders), they took this to mean CG(X) would suffer from the same issues the Zumwalt did, so they killed that around 2009 or so.

That left an obvious hole in the fleet though, the Ticos still needed to be replaced by the end of the 2010s. Designing a new hull would take too long (and Congress wouldn't allow it either), and the clock was ticking to get something to the yards quickly. The 2009 Radar/Hull Study examined 2 options for Tico replacement, a heavily modified Burke, or an AAW Zumwalt. Both options had several glaring issues, the Burke would need virtually a complete powerplant redesign to fit AMDR, and the Zumwalt would need years worth of programming work to either combine AEGIS with TSCE or remove TSCE entirely.

The Navy ultimately chose the heavily modernized Burke option, thinking it would be less risky and cheaper, but they seem to have underestimated just how extensive those changes would be. An AAW Zumwalt would also cause oddities in construction schedules, that would require retooling the yards. Flight III design took years, granted it was relatively on budget, but the design is... less than ideal in several metrics (namely the lack of SWAPC margin).

With the Flight III design underway, the Navy started looking at a clean-sheet design around 2014. This came in the form of the Future Surface Combatant (FSC) and Large Surface Combatant (LSC) programs. The issue though was that with the sudden change in policy towards fighting China, the Navy didn't really know what it wanted for a future design. That began dozens of different studies to first determine how to fight China, then the fleet architecture, then the future threats, then the future technologies, then the best ways to implement said technologies, etc. It seems only around 2019 or so did this work finish, and preliminary DDG(X) work could begin. I believe they said that the preliminary sketch work was just finished a few months ago.
 
Last edited:
Some people mentioned that it was originated from slide shows/display in SNA2022. I was quite surprised there are no further news after that show.
 
Some people mentioned that it was originated from slide shows/display in SNA2022. I was quite surprised there are no further news after that show.
They seem to have stopped posting the slideshows. They never posted the SNA2024 slides either, much to my dismay.
 
Well I know somewhere on this site someone posted the 4 1980s block 3 variants, with sizes and vls numbers. but I can't for the life of me find them again, but if someone can remember were that post was it sould probably be put in this thread as well.
 
Seventh post of this thread
That isn't it, that was the final version, I'm talking about the 4 options discussed before they decided on that version, the post I'm talking about didn't have pictures as well, just a link I think.
 
I'm no shipbuilder, but should anyone start having concerns about topweight and stability here? Trying to fit 10 pounds into a 5 pound bag. Is that added superstructure of aluminum construction?
I'm sure they've done the math here, but yeah, these ships are absolutely maxed out and may well need ballast.
 
My understanding is that a significant part of these new 'cheeks' is in fact empty space - an enclosure to make it easier to work on the SLQ-32(V)7 while the ship is underway. Though SLQ-32(V)7 is bulkier than past SLQ-32 versions, you can also still clearly see that it's not taking up the entire cheek and the enclosure is sort of a natural progression to what we've seen o DDG-125_acceptance_trials.jpg n older Burke's. Even if it's still ugly as sin.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom