An example from WW1
 

Attachments

  • DE Daimler MarienWagen I mit Panzeraufbau 1917 (APC) -1.jpg
    DE Daimler MarienWagen I mit Panzeraufbau 1917 (APC) -1.jpg
    39.1 KB · Views: 129
During the summer of 1944, massive infantry casualties forced the Canadian Army to convert a bunch of M7 Priests and Ram tanks to improvised APCs. They first saw battle during August 1944.

The "de-frocked" M7 Priests had "shot-out" their barrels, but were otherwise in good shape. RCEME welded steel plates over the gun slots. When they ran low on salvaged steel plate, they welded on two thinner plates and filled the gap with sand.

The Canadian-built Ram tanks had been used for training in the UK, but were replaced by M4 Shermans before the Normandy invasion. Some had already been converted to artillery O.P.s with steel roofs and extra radios. The bulk of Ram/Kangaroo APCS just had their turrets removed and some internal stowage relocated. When Ram/Kangaroos were used to transport ammo, they were referred to as Wallabies.

At the end of the war, all these ad hoc APCs were left in depots in Holland.
 
Given how often the Soviets had their infantry ride on their tanks even during assaults I've got to wonder why they didn't do a simple "kangaroo" job of some T-34s. The infantry in them would be a lot less vulnerable to MGs and small arms and artillery that isn't air bursting.
 
The Soviets did experiment with a limited run of a converted variant of the BA-64 armoured car, but they had access to the M3 half-track and armoured car for APC use. Use of these, as well as inspection and ad hoc use of the Sdkfz 251 led to the development of the Btr 40 and 152 immediately after WW2.
 
During the First World War in Russia, the inventor Konovalov proposed to make armored transporters on the basis of 3- and 5-ton trucks, having chromium-nickel armor with a thickness of 4 and 6 mm, armament from a machine gun in the front turret, embrasures for firing rifles, wheels with metal discs covering spokes, and with a doubled width of the supporting surface, for the transport of 20 people. Engineer Poplavko built several armored vehicles based on the Jeffrey Quad truck, capable of carrying up to 10 people armed with Mauser C96 pistols, grenades and daggers.
During World War II, several armored personnel carriers, B-3, TB-42, BA-22 and others were developed in the USSR, but they were all rather weak because they were based on Soviet trucks that did not have sufficiently powerful engines (during the First World Bobrovsky believed that a 1.5-ton truck should have a 65-horsepower engine and a speed of over 100 kmph, the most massive Soviet 1.5-ton truck GAZ-AA had only 40 hp and a speed of 70 kmph). In 1941, on the eve of the German attack on the USSR, the development of wheeled and tracked transporters was ordered. In the 30s, there were experiments with different transporters based on the T-26 and BT tanks. During the war, the USSR could not afford to produce such equipment, it could not even supply the army with trucks and tractors. It is curious that it was the shortage of armored personnel carriers that served as a reason for the military to abandon reactive armor from 1929 (the first project in the USSR) to 1965, because the infantry rode tanks, and reactive armor was considered dangerous for soldiers (although this sounds more like a strange excuse, but perhaps the real reason was that the USSR had a rather limited production of explosives, even with supplies from the United States and Britain, it could not provide the army with shells and bombs).
BA-64E:
BA-22:
B-3:
 
The "de-frocked" M7 Priests had "shot-out" their barrels, but were otherwise in good shape. RCEME welded steel plates over the gun slots.

More complicated than that. The Priests had been issued to the Field Artillery Regts of 3rd British and 3rd Canadian Divs as assault divisions ahead of D-Day. It was not meant to be permanent.

More on the background to the changes here

And on the Kangaroos (one of several threads about them on that site)

There were Sherman and Priest Kangaroos in Italy In 1944/45 and Churchill Kangaroos postwar.
 
Hi.

Some japanese stuff of WW2:

jap typ 1 apc ho-ha.jpg
Type 1 Armored Halftrack Ho-Ha

jap typ 1 apc ho ki.jpg
Type 1 Armored Transport Ho-Ki, mainly used as ammunition carrier in gun tank units but also as troop transporter

jap typ 95 eisenbahnpionierpanzerwagen so-Ki 3.jpg
Type 95 Armored Railway Car So-Ki, used as towing and transport vehicle for railway engineers. It had a dual drive to change between tracks and railway wheels with variable gauge.

Yours

tom! ;)
 
Last edited:
The US also fielded the M39 Armored Utility Vehicle, based on the chassis of the M18 tank destroyer. They built/converted about 650 between October 1944 and March 1945 and used them heavily in both WWII and Korea, where their mobility was appreciated but lack of overhead cover was not (particularly in Korea).

Post WWII, it was developed into the very large M44 APC (carried 24 troops!). The US decided this was to big, and dropped the design, though it was developed for a limited production run as the T17 Command Post Vehicle (or Tactical Air Control Party Vehicle) for the US Air Force, which used them for FACs in Korea. While the M39/M44 path didn't work out, it showed the way for the US to go down the M75 - M59 - M113 path that served the US for quite some time.

A few M39 persisted with the Bundeswehr's Panzergrenadiers, as interim APC, until 1960.

 
Hi.

The Type 98 Armored Carrier So-Da was rated as protected battlefield ammunition carrier and not really suitable for personell transport. So I wouldn´t call him an an APC even if it could carry soldiers like any other truck, too.

Yours

tom! ;)
 
I wonder if the Crusader Gun Tractor could have made a viable APC? Delete the ammunition stowage to provide more room for troops and their equipment and it could have proven superior to the various Kangaroos actually deployed.

Another thought is the what about the M-3 Medium and the Churchill Kangaroos with their side doors?
 
I wonder if the Crusader Gun Tractor could have made a viable APC? Delete the ammunition stowage to provide more room for troops and their equipment and it could have proven superior to the various Kangaroos actually deployed.
But a whole lot less reliable mechanically.
Another thought is the what about the M-3 Medium and the Churchill Kangaroos with their side doors?
Try getting a whole infantry squad in full kit through one of them holes tout suite! Might be a bit of a problem. When the Churchill was converted postwar, they still went over the top.
 
Late in WW 2 the Germans experimentally built the Kätzchen (Kitten) APC. There were two versions tested. This is the one on the Pz 38d chassis. Yes, there is a d (German) version of that hull with sloped sides behind the road wheels, making it slightly wider.

1640883859283.png

There is also the Auto Union version built on an E series chassis

1640884027855.png

Both were still open topped and designed to carry 8 or 9 men total. They look fairly modern for 1945.
 
I wonder if the Crusader Gun Tractor could have made a viable APC? Delete the ammunition stowage to provide more room for troops and their equipment and it could have proven superior to the various Kangaroos actually deployed.
But a whole lot less reliable mechanically.
Another thought is the what about the M-3 Medium and the Churchill Kangaroos with their side doors?
Try getting a whole infantry squad in full kit through one of them holes tout suite! Might be a bit of a problem. When the Churchill was converted postwar, they still went over the top.
Churchill side doors probably couldn’t be made bigger, but m3 could have been, also a door where the 75 was, appreciate this faces the enemy….

Really needs someone to have the idea of reversing the tank, so engine first, then you can rebuilt the old front, into big rear doors. Then the Sherman or ram would be great.
 
Th
This is the Ford S1 scout produced originally for Australia,

View attachment 670633
Some ended up in the USAAF for airfield defense.

Canada produced the C15TA that was used by the Dutch in Asia along with their own forces

View attachment 670634
The C15TA armored ambulance was also used as an APC by Canadian soldiers in Holland during 1945. "Armored ambulance" is a bit of a misnomer as it was never completely armored. yes, the engine and driver were armored (against rifle bullets) but armor only went part way up the sides of the cargo/casualty compartment.
The Canadian Army also used White Scout Cars and M3 half-tracks, but never had enough to drive significant numbers of infantry into battle. Something like 40 percent of Canadian infantry casualties were caused by mortars and plunging artillery before they got within sight of the Germans.
 
UK's Bren Carrier ?
Must be said it was soon seen as too small, under-powered and seriously obsolete, but I'm told you could 'Clown Car' load it at a pinch...
 
I found a few French vehicles that could be called APCs:
 

Attachments

  • image_2021-12-30_200628.png
    image_2021-12-30_200628.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 106
  • 636px-Panhard_179_VC3A9hicule_de_Transport_de_Troupe_28VTT292C_Armoured_Car2C_Troop_Carrier.png
    636px-Panhard_179_VC3A9hicule_de_Transport_de_Troupe_28VTT292C_Armoured_Car2C_Troop_Carrier.png
    131.8 KB · Views: 112
This is the Ford S1 scout produced originally for Australia,

View attachment 670633
Some ended up in the USAAF for airfield defense.

Canada produced the C15TA that was used by the Dutch in Asia along with their own forces

View attachment 670634

That Ford S-1 vaguely resembles the Armoured Carrier, Wheeled, Indian Pattern Mark I. The Mark I had a front engine while all later versions had rear engines. They were mounted on Canadian-made CMP truck chassis with Indian-made armoured (e.g. Tata Locomotive factory) hulls. 4,655 were built during WW2, but they only served in India. They looked like enlarged Dingo scout cars, with open tops but with sloped glacis plates more like (post war) Ferrets. All up weight 2.6 long tonnes. The crew compartment was only big enough for 4 or 5 soldiers. They did not match the modern definition of APCs, but were used more like Carden-Lloyd Bren/Universal Carriers for scouting and moving ammo around the battlefield. Typical armament was a pintle-mounted Bren Gun.
 
UK's Bren Carrier ?
Must be said it was soon seen as too small, under-powered and seriously obsolete, but I'm told you could 'Clown Car' load it at a pinch...
There are several variants that were in use:

The actual Bren carrier was only produced very early in the war. There was also a scout model, along with a third carrier type. These were combined into the universal carrier (which still often got called a Bren carrier).

Another variant was the Lloyd carrier used as a gun tractor.

1640974988806.png

Some early war variants of this sort of included:

The Belgian Vickers utility tractor

1640975168387.png

The Russian T20 Kosomolets

1640975253715.png

And the French UE tractor

1640975372243.png

While these are more like artillery tugs than true APC's all but possibly the Lloyd got makeshift conversions that turned them into APC's and even self-propelled gun carriages.
 
Spanish APCs from the Rif War.
 

Attachments

  • schneiner1909b.jpg
    schneiner1909b.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 60
  • schneiner1909f.jpg
    schneiner1909f.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 51
  • schneiner1909d.jpg
    schneiner1909d.jpg
    40.9 KB · Views: 51
  • schneiner1909c.jpg
    schneiner1909c.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 54
  • Spa-Schneider1911-IonFonosh.jpg
    Spa-Schneider1911-IonFonosh.jpg
    149.1 KB · Views: 58
The Russian T20 Kosomolets
This is an artillery tractor. This is not an armored personnel carrier.

0_82b3a_f042fe91_orig.jpg
 
Must apologise for double-take at '1909d' above...

Thumbnail did not sufficiently distinguish between vehicle on dock and ship superstructure...

Is it a bird ? Is it a plane ?? Is it a 'FUSO' Battle Bus ???

Ah...
 

The LVT is yet another APC of specialized use that was built during WW 2

View attachment 670662

The Canadians made good use of these during their 'polder' campaign in Holland late in the war, aside from the USMC's use.
Another one in a similar vein would be the ijn type 4 Ka-Tsu
1570874753_type-4-ka-tsu-image01.jpg

sadly tho by the time it was ready the tactical situation had changed.......

Hi.

Again just an armoured cargo/fighting vehicle not developed for soldier transport. There was a similar vehicle with a boat-shaped bow developed by Mitsubishi as amphibious APC but it remains prototype only:

jap experimental lvt toyota.jpg

Yours

tom! ;)
 
There was a German vehicle design from ww2 armed with a 20mm that was basically an ifv.
And in ww1, the British used modified lorries as apcs in Ireland.
Interesting little note, but I heard of an instance when an A7V was unable to depress its guns enough to engage a foxhole, so the crew exited the vehicle and dispatched the enemy with their weapons.
The Marien-wagen, an interesting vehicle previously referenced, is in my opinion worthy of further discussion as an ideological predecessor to the modern Russian vehicles BMO-1 and BMO-T, regarding the use of an apc to deliver infantry with heavy weapons that are dangerous to move across the battlefield. Any other specific examples of this concept?
 
I found a few French vehicles that could be called APCs:
Theres the rather neat little Lorraine 39L apc which just missed out on going into production
39_2.jpg

Lorraine_39L-APC.jpg
1641406114310.png

VBCP 38L was the ammunition/refueling tractor Lorraine 37 with an armored trailer that could carry 6 troops on bench seats and two troopers in the back. Crew was two. 150 were delivered to four battalions by May 1940.
 
View attachment 670790

The ugly step-sister to the M113? Or, a M113 cross bred with an LVTP 5...
That's the M44. Design was started in November 1944 as the T13, the redesigned some in April 1945 as the T16. It could carry 24 troops. The photo is post WW 2.
Would anyone here know of the T17 USAF command post variant mentioned in the article, I'm intrigued but cannot find anything after some googling around?
Thanks in advance.

Bing
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom