Aircraft - Real or fake?

Main landing gear's position would cause the thing to rest on its nose. There could be a nose wheel hiding under the fuselage, with the apparently fixed tail wheel that would make landing cumbersome. Passenger doors could be two-part things, with the lower part dropping down, or one-part with the whole thing sliding inside, then sideways. Complex. NOTAR system to explain absence of tail rotor, but I see no control vents. There are some suspicious looking rods sticking out of the extreme tail.

None of the details are completely impossible. It smells of Colani.

In my opinion it adds up to fake.
 
b54710333afcffb1c932672bfaeb8fa6.jpg To be honest, guys, I've always wanted to know if the S.21 from the Netherlands really has a plan to mount a 40mm cannon
:)
 
Was that a real aircraft ?,

 

Attachments

  • Компоновка на 1 листе.jpg
    Компоновка на 1 листе.jpg
    151.5 KB · Views: 57
View attachment 757351To be honest, guys, I've always wanted to know if the S.21 from the Netherlands really has a plan to mount a 40mm cannon
:)
Kind of an odd speculative side-view.
The top-mounted, rear-facing machine gun is bogus because the original was planed to get a rear-firing 7.92mm MG firing through the hollow prop shaft (ala. Me.109, Moraine-Saulnier 406 and Yakovlevs)
 
Was that a real aircraft ?,

MiG-3 tailsurfaces?
 
Thank youy my dear Justo,

and I think that's fake design,am I right ?.
 

Attachments

  • 23.jpg
    23.jpg
    21.4 KB · Views: 32
One of the tags in the image says 'interstellar nav. equipment' - some science fiction art, with low science content.
 

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom