StealthHunter said:...
I'm not sure what to make of the "17mm guns" though as I can't seem to find any weapon of that caliber in the Japanese arsenal.
Because not all the intended missions were a one-way.An interesting aircraft and an interesting concept, too, that could have had
quite a diversionary effect, probably more, than achieving actual damage.
One question remains to me, triggered partly by the picture of the Seiran with
deceptive markings : Were those floats for training purposes only ? What I read
still yet, for the actual attack, the floats would have been jettisoned and the
aircraft ditched, when coming back. But why then take-off with them at all ? And
for training I can imagine, that the floats would have quite an effect on handling
characteristics. On board of the subs, they occupied space and weight. Or doubled
they as a kind of jettisonable fuel tank ?
First, it was absolutly fake that this plane could abandon her floats after taken off. She must decide whether to carry the floats BEFORE taking off. This information comes from the original blueprint and development notes that Aichi Kokuki KK's Dr.Watanabe had given me.Reading the chapter about the Aichi M6A1 Seiran/I-400 submarine in "Strike From Beneath The Sea" by Terry C. Treadwell,
I wondered, why this aircraft actually were fitted with floats ? In the mentioned book and in other sources, too, it's said,
that they should be catapulted from the submarine and jettison their floats just after take-off. Due to the nature of those
missions, it sounds very plausible to use every available way to increase speed and range. If they would ever return to their
motherships, it seems they weren't actually intended to be taken aboard again, but to be ditched alongside. Understandable,
as hoisting the aircraft, dismantling them and putting them back into their containers probably would take much longer, than
readying and launching them. And this would have to be done facing a warned enemy ! But then, why was volume, weight
and quite probably time for dismantling sacrificed for parts, that seem to have brought only disadvantages ?
Do you have any information on the range/operational radius of the aircraft? There's a frustrating number of contradictary figures online that don't specify whether their figures are total range, operational radius, and whether or not these are with floats and/or ordinance.This information comes from the original blueprint and development notes that Aichi Kokuki KK's Dr.Watanabe had given me.
I do have! let me take some time!Do you have any information on the range/operational radius of the aircraft? There's a frustrating number of contradictary figures online that don't specify whether their figures are total range, operational radius, and whether or not these are with floats and/or ordinance.
Please and thank you!I do have! let me take some time!
you guys could email me and I will give you the original blueprint and performance calculations done by aichi kokuki kk in 1944Please and thank you!
my email is: zhaoziyuan@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jpPlease and thank you!
sent you an email.my email is: zhaoziyuan@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Oh, very nice!Some pics of model I built sometime around 2001 or so. You can see more pics at www.mercenarymodels.com