ADF to LWF: Evolution of the General Dynamics F-16

Wow, the clean-ups look great! Thanks! I'm a big F-16 fan and have been collecting material on this bird since it was rolled out (I was in high school, a looong time ago). I fell in love with the YF-16 and thought it was the hottest looking plane around. I do have a nice F-16XL Cunningham drawing with the plane in r/w/b markings and a slightly different tail which I'll try to post this weekend.
Mark- I want to thank you for all your posts. I've been lurking around here for awhile and have been amazed by items you have posted. I have been especially pleased with the matieral on the naval version of the F-16, I tried to obtain this stuff from LTV years ago and they never responded (maybe it was a sore spot?).
 
Hi- Wanted to share an intersting model with you. I found this on Ebay with a low Buy It Now price and grabbed it. It appears to be an in-house model of a close to final configuration for the F-16. It is a solid, pretty heavy little model. In the second photo I have it next to a Precise YF-16 for comparison. You can see it is a little smaller than the Precise -16 and is mounted differently. The markings also look like those found on early drawings for the model 401. Besides no wingtip missile rails, the engine exhaust is also a little different different.
 

Attachments

  • Model 401.jpg
    Model 401.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 467
  • Model comparison.jpg
    Model comparison.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 486
RAP said:
It appears to be an in-house model of a close to final configuration for the F-16.

You can see it is a little smaller than the Precise -16 and is mounted differently.
Click to expand...

Very interesting find!! And very observant on your behalf RAP!!
I would be very interesting to see if the combined knowledge of our colleagues can confirm your analogy!
After all, if this is the case, I'm sure the likes of John Boyd, Pierre Sprey and Everest Riccioni would have been happier to have seen s slightly smaller and lighter F-16 to that of the F-16, which in itself grew in size and weight (and complexity) from that of the original YF-16A!!

Regards
Pioneer
 
I had not thought about that. I thought if it was a GD model than perhaps they made it in a different scale. I think a lot of in-house models were made in different scales, i.e. 1/60 vs. 1/72, 1/40 vs. 1/48. I'm not sure why. Maybe someone with more knowledge of these can provide insight, Circle-5? Attached are 2 shots of my F-16 model collection. Its a combo of mfg. models and commerical models. Anyone out there with a unique F-16 model, please post a shot. (Don't know if this is the proper place for this so please move it its not, thanks).
 

Attachments

  • 003.JPG
    003.JPG
    826.2 KB · Views: 2,091
  • 004.JPG
    004.JPG
    829 KB · Views: 1,886

Attachments

  • AA_19710406_ADF_Config_401B_1267828237_3743-sm.jpg
    AA_19710406_ADF_Config_401B_1267828237_3743-sm.jpg
    166.5 KB · Views: 1,686
  • AA_19710813_ADF_Config_772_inboard_1267828237_5922-sm.jpg
    AA_19710813_ADF_Config_772_inboard_1267828237_5922-sm.jpg
    124.2 KB · Views: 2,777
Last edited:
They're *both* absolutely fascinating! The canard delta because its high LE sweep angle and uncropped tips are unmistakably reminiscent of famous predecessors from the era when the company was still known as Convair: sort of a F-106/F-16 missing evolutionary link! Meanwhile, the twin tail design is stunningly close to the Su-27 (and also the single-engine S-54/55/56) - I've always held that in purely technical terms (as opposed to military role) the F-16 resembles the Flanker most out of its Western contemporaries, rather than the F-14 or F-15.
 
Yeah, I immediately thought of the Convair model 200 series when I first saw it. I was wondering if it was an actual design, or a reference design just to use to compare it with their baseline LWF design. Whatever the reasoning, it's a cool looking design.
 
"Alternate ADF study" makes me think this was a deliberate evaluation of the Convair-200-style canard delta layout to make sure it wasn't better than the tailed layout.
 
RAP said:
Here are a couple of drawings of the 401 twin tail design. I apologize for the quality, the drawings were large and folded. I have a couple of other drawings that I'll post a little later.
Click to expand...


For some reason I really like this design. The wing planform reminds me of the space shuttle's delta shape.
 
www.codeonemagazine.com

Aircraft Design Studies | Code One Magazine

Recently released preliminary design drawings from the deepest files in the Lockheed Martin archives are exposed in this exclusive online collection.
www.codeonemagazine.com

Twin-Engine Lightweight Fighter
Configuration 503 was part of the design studies that led to the YF-16. Drawing dated 20 January 1972.
Click to expand...

Uses two F-16 style pitot intakes with, presumably, twin GE J101 engines. Large drawing on CodeOne website.
 

Attachments

  • AA_19720120_LWF_Config_503_1267828237_6198-sm.jpg
    AA_19720120_LWF_Config_503_1267828237_6198-sm.jpg
    97.2 KB · Views: 3,907
Last edited:
Do you have another part of this drawing?


index.php
 
what part?


We have some variations in the ADF collection (yet to be posted). Stay tuned.


I also have a collection of photos of desk models from the LFW design studies... somewhere.



--C1
 
Another variation from Feb 1971 - 404F.


Source: CodeOne Facebook page
 

Attachments

  • 8511_680312125319429_2145604466_n.jpg
    8511_680312125319429_2145604466_n.jpg
    51.8 KB · Views: 648
RAP said:
Hi- Wanted to share an intersting model with you. I found this on Ebay with a low Buy It Now price and grabbed it. It appears to be an in-house model of a close to final configuration for the F-16. It is a solid, pretty heavy little model. In the second photo I have it next to a Precise YF-16 for comparison. You can see it is a little smaller than the Precise -16 and is mounted differently. The markings also look like those found on early drawings for the model 401. Besides no wingtip missile rails, the engine exhaust is also a little different different.
Click to expand...


Tailplane trailing edge is straight as well, not swept forward and the LERX is straight edged.


If its not just inaccurate, it seems closest to Model 401F-10A
 
Last edited:
When I first saw that delta canard F-16 I thought it was related to the GD Model 200 but when I looked at it closer I realized it was more F-16 that 200 and even looks kinda like the Lavi. I think I've read somewhere here in SPF that an early Lavi design was a modified F-16, does this delta canard have anything to do with Lavi?
 
From CodeOneMagazine Facebook site.
 

Attachments

  • 1393428_804915252859115_1729228138_n.jpg
    1393428_804915252859115_1729228138_n.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 1,134
CodeOneMagazine - YF-16 Evolution B) ;D


The F-16, as finally completed in prototype form, was a synthesis of advanced state-of-the-art technologies that had been explored for years, but until the advent of the new General Dynamics airplane, had never been blended together in a single airframe.

These charts are from Harry Hillaker's F-16 presentation he often gave after his retirement.
Click to expand...



I won't download all picture charts and attach them to this topic. It would just blow up this topic.
Maybe a Mod could attach all picture charts in one compressed file (.zip / .rar) to this topic.
 

Attachments

  • Hillaker_F16_01_1267828237_1542.jpg
    Hillaker_F16_01_1267828237_1542.jpg
    146 KB · Views: 960
30MB PDF (61 pages) HERE.


Don't forget to visit CodeOne website


www.codeonemagazine.com

<title>YF-16 Evolution | Code One Magazine</title>

The F-16, as finally completed in prototype form, was a synthesis of advanced state-of-the-art technologies that had been explored for years, but until the advent of the new General Dynamics airplane, had never been blended together in a single airframe.
www.codeonemagazine.com


And say thanks in comments on the site or via Facebook etc.
 
And now some discussions provoked by this document. Interesting pics of early concepts:
 

Attachments

  • ADF.jpg
    ADF.jpg
    160.1 KB · Views: 863
  • LWF.jpg
    LWF.jpg
    162.9 KB · Views: 1,716
  • LWFIntakeModels.jpg
    LWFIntakeModels.jpg
    180.6 KB · Views: 869
785, 772, 503 designs were alternate "Red Team" studies to test against the 401 design.


785: same weight, lower performance.


772: less subsonic performance, equal supersonic performance, heavier, more complex.


503: same performance but heavier
 

Attachments

  • Hillaker_F16_62_1267828237_2223.jpg
    Hillaker_F16_62_1267828237_2223.jpg
    104.6 KB · Views: 2,129
PaulMM, unfortunately I can't download your pdf-file. It stops at 6.2/ 29.5 MB. :(

Edit: Just downloaded it with my tablet. :)
 
Great find, thank you!
 
Is it just me or does the 772 design look a bit like the J-10…or is that the J-10 looks a bit like the 772? ;)
 
So that twin engine single seat swing wing we've seen over at APR for a long time is just a swing wing version of the ADF. Very cool.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom