Christopher Wang
ACCESS: Secret
- Joined
- 3 June 2021
- Messages
- 251
- Reaction score
- 497
Would the 156-inch and 260-inch ICBMs have used a cold launch system?
not true.I can't imagine what it'd take to thump those things upwards.
They would have more general overall utility to humanity than SLBMs that can only kill.
A gas generator that makes roughly the total stack weight in thrust for a fraction of a second, if I understand the basics correctly.I can't imagine what it'd take to thump those things upwards.
You presumably need to exceed the stack weight, that being how physics works, and provide enough energy to lob the thing out of the silo to whatever height you've deemed safe for main stage ignition. It's presumably similar to an interior ballistics calculation.A gas generator that makes roughly the total stack weight in thrust for a fraction of a second, if I understand the basics correctly.
That "enough energy to lob the thing clear" part usually comes from further expanding gasses continuing to push.You presumably need to exceed the stack weight, that being how physics works, and provide enough energy to lob the thing out of the silo to whatever height you've deemed safe for main stage ignition. It's presumably similar to an interior ballistics calculation.
You presumably need to exceed the stack weight, that being how physics works, and provide enough energy to lob the thing out of the silo to whatever height you've deemed safe for main stage ignition. It's presumably similar to an interior ballistics calculation.
It was implied to be a Saturn V derivative but I haven't been able to dig up anything more so far.