Amazon gets 9 ULA satellite launch vehicles for broadband internet program
Amazon.com Inc said on Monday it had secured nine satellite launch vehicles from United Launch Alliance (ULA) to support the initial deployment of its broadband int…
Amazon just announced the biggest commercial launch purchase ever. Basically, they bought every available Western rocket for the next five years that didn't have a Falcon stenciled on it.https://t.co/P1a6v1Ra7w
— Eric Berger (@SciGuySpace) April 5, 2022
Because SpaceX will use Starship launch for Starlink...Not sure it is a good idea...
Amazon is also behind SpaceX because it does not have its own rocket, and no one in the industry can compete with SpaceX's Falcon 9 on price or launch cadence. The Falcon 9 rocket could launch as many as 60 times this year, and because SpaceX can reuse the first stage and payload fairing, the internal cost per launch is probably substantially less than $30 million. Amazon is likely paying, on average, at least three times as much per launch.
We are proud to announce that we have signed a contract with @Amazon for 18 @Ariane6 launches to deploy #ProjectKuiper… The largest contract we have ever signed! 🥳 pic.twitter.com/qRdiSmGXqJ
— Arianespace (@Arianespace) April 5, 2022
Amazon selects Blue Origin’s New Glenn for 12 launches, with options for up to 15 additional launches of Kuiper’s satellite constellation. Learn more: https://t.co/WnSP6N4tgj pic.twitter.com/S8HcANaAnB
— Blue Origin (@blueorigin) April 5, 2022
what to hell will build SpaceX then, Nova or Supernova class reusable rockets ?!when SpaceX comparable systems either stop production or even retire for Starship ?
Amazon have billions to burn and a strict timeline by which to get their constellation up, and I imagine that timeline is more important than the cost. To be blunt I doubt that companies or individuals worth billions of dollars sweat a few 10s or even 100 millions here or there.From the article:
Amazon is also behind SpaceX because it does not have its own rocket, and no one in the industry can compete with SpaceX's Falcon 9 on price or launch cadence. The Falcon 9 rocket could launch as many as 60 times this year, and because SpaceX can reuse the first stage and payload fairing, the internal cost per launch is probably substantially less than $30 million. Amazon is likely paying, on average, at least three times as much per launch.
ULA Vulcan ~85m per launch
Ariane 62 ~85m per launch
Ariane 64 ~125m per launch
New Glenn (about the same ball park)
Assume an average of around $100m per launch, 83 launches would cost Bezos $8.3 billion.
Bezos current worth is somewhere north of $177 billion. So 8.3 billion is small potatoes.......
+ he's got to build the satellites.
Those 3 megaconstellations are going to hold sway over a huge chunk of human communication in the future (+ all the 'housekeeping comms' for IOT tech, + all the surveillance streaming from people's TV sets etc)Another crazy whacky irony this week was Oneweb - the perenial bankrupt megaconstellation company that never dies - booking SpaceX flights after the Russians screwed them.
This means that Musk not only has Starlink but rival Oneweb: while the entire rocket world opposite of him just snatched Bezos Kuiper.
That "war of three megaconstellations" really is turning bizarro.
Whoever gets there first wins. There is no such thing as "classic" rocketry. You use whatever is available.
The Polyus of comsats. The DoD needs a Pez... Bezos should build an Orbital Antenna Farm...trade latency for longer life.Because SpaceX will use Starship launch for Starlink...Not sure it is a good idea...
and testing already a Starlink dispenser...
Amazon Kuiper prototype broadband sats enroute to Cape Canaveral - Dave Limp says at opening session of Satellite 2023
Amazon Kuiper prototype broadband sats enroute to Cape Canaveral - Dave Limp says at opening session of Satellite 2023
— Irene Klotz (@Free_Space) March 14, 2023