FighterJock
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 29 October 2007
- Messages
- 4,388
- Reaction score
- 3,655
Thanks Anderman, now I know the true source of the information that wiki used.
There is of course the possibility that the EDR article pulled it from wiki and then the German wiki pulled it from EDR. Waterline is stated at 39m, Gerald Ford Class is stated at 41m, QE Class also 39m. Gerald Ford deck width is 78m, QE deck width is 73m. 75m seems more likely, unless the 85m includes the over-hanging weapons placements off the side.The german Wiki also has a width of 85 m and it source is this article of EDR.
French Navy new generation aircraft carrier design detailed - EDR Magazine
EDR reveals further details on the French Navy new generation aircraft carrier that was unveiled by the French DGA during Euronaval 2022www.edrmagazine.eu
yeah, I fully expected France's next carrier to be that kind of size.Looks like big-deck flattops make sense, i.e China and now France. And France is returning to nuke power with their PA-NG, plus the French make very good commercial reactors which power their country as well.
Toulon in particular can take a Nimitz class CVN in one drydock.Neither Toulon or Brest have any major restrictions.
And France is returning to nuke power with their PA-NG (...)
yeah, I fully expected France's next carrier to be that kind of size.
The only issue I have with French reactors is that they use LEU, which means they need to be refueled much more often. On the subs, they have a bolted on hatch for access to save them from cutting into the hull every 7-8 years. I don't know how that will work around all the stuff that is between the reactors and the flight deck, and I suspect poorly.