Yes, but you'd have the issue that missiles could work with either Type 901 but not both; you could change components in the guidance receiver to allow it to work with the 'other' 901 but that takes time, and it is one missile at a time.Thank you!
So the final GW96 missile cruiser design with one twin launcher but two Type 901 could track two targets and guide theoretically 4 missiles yes?
When I played the Cold War simulator game Harpoon way back in the day, I was once faced with a South American County as my enemy. I fired four Exocets at it and it sent out what seemed like an endless stream of Sea Slugs that shot them all down. I was highly annoyed, because I figured there was no way a real County should be able to do that and it looks like I was right.The system could cope with two missiles in the beam (by designating them 'left' and 'right') so that they could be given individual 'arm' and 'detonate' commands; the Mk2 also had the dive/glide command. Extra missiles in the beam would react to commands to earlier missiles so no, only two at a time. The salvo separation was six seconds, and the computer only required a couple of seconds between salvoes -a reset time between 'end of engagement' and another salvo.
Well, Masurca was clearly more advanced. It was essentially a French analogue to RIM-2 Terrier, and it have both beam-riding and semi-active homing modes. It have more range than Seaslug, better guidance (at least in the homing version), and faster loading from horizontal drums. Still required finning, though.I would also like to know how Sea Slug would compare to Masurca,
I recall reading somewhere that the SARH version was introduced after the Americans gave some input and technical assistance, after which it pretty much becomes Monsieur Terrier.Well, Masurca was clearly more advanced. It was essentially a French analogue to RIM-2 Terrier, and it have both beam-riding and semi-active homing modes.