Zlin-Moravan Projects

Maveric

Fight for yor Right!
Joined
14 January 2007
Messages
2,180
Reaction score
746
Hi all,

some nice czech projrcts for you. (Source FliegerRevue 1983)

Servus Maveric
 

Attachments

  • z44.jpg
    z44.jpg
    6.1 KB · Views: 564
  • z45.jpg
    z45.jpg
    22.7 KB · Views: 551
  • z46.jpg
    z46.jpg
    29.1 KB · Views: 553
A little info,

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,887.msg6972/highlight,zlin+z
 
A little more info!
(Source: V. Nĕmeček. Československa letadla. Vol.2 (1945-1984), Praga, 1984).

Z-28 was 4-seat utility aircraft designed by eng. Ladislav Marcol in 1947. It was a counterpart for Avia Ae-45 and looked much like twin-engined Z-22 Junak. The engines were Walter Minor 4-III, 105 hp each.
Z-33 named Derviš, also designed by Marcol, was single-seat light sport aircraft with 40-hp engine, reaching 154 km/h maximum speed.
The twin-boom Z-34 was an agricultural design from 1958 by eng. Závrbský. It was powered by two M-337 engines (210 hp each) and could carry 600 kg of chemicals.
Z-36 (1960) was single-seat ultralight aircraft designed by eng. Dobrovolský, with 36-hp Jawa engine.
Z-38 was a project of agricultural autogyro, designed by eng. Jan Mikula in 1963. Powered by M-337, it could carry 300 kg of chemicals.
Z-39 was a two-seat trainer project from 1963, powered by M-137 engine (180 hp), with tricycle gear.
Z-426 and Z-626 - two "missing links" of the famous “Trener” family. The first was light agricultural aircraft from 1960, with Walter Minor 6-III or M-337 engine, carrying 100 kg of chemicals. Z-626 was “simplified” version of aerobatic Z-526AS, with fixed landing gear, designed in 1967.
 

Attachments

  • Z-626.jpg
    Z-626.jpg
    62.5 KB · Views: 77
  • Z-426.jpg
    Z-426.jpg
    59.1 KB · Views: 73
  • Z-39.jpg
    Z-39.jpg
    58.6 KB · Views: 65
  • Z-38.jpg
    Z-38.jpg
    152.4 KB · Views: 74
  • Z-36.jpg
    Z-36.jpg
    96.5 KB · Views: 81
  • Z-34.jpg
    Z-34.jpg
    146 KB · Views: 482
  • Z-28_Z-33.jpg
    Z-28_Z-33.jpg
    110.3 KB · Views: 502
Z-41 was, basically, the same Z-42 - but lighter, with 4-cylinder M-132 engine instead of 6-cylinder M-137. M-132 was projected as M-332 “aerobatic” version without compressor (it referred to M-332 in the same way as M-137 to M-337). But finally M-132 engine was never produced, and therefore Z-41 also remained on paper. Another unrealized derivative of this family was Z-43R, which was Z-43 with retractable landing gear and (optionally) 250-hp M-437 engine.
 

Attachments

  • Z-41_Z-44_Z-45.jpg
    Z-41_Z-44_Z-45.jpg
    165.2 KB · Views: 97
  • Z-43R_Z-46_Z-47_Z-48.jpg
    Z-43R_Z-46_Z-47_Z-48.jpg
    226.6 KB · Views: 125
Hi all,

...Zlin Z-52 (source: L+K 1987)

Servus Maveric
 

Attachments

  • Zlin Z-52.jpg
    Zlin Z-52.jpg
    100.6 KB · Views: 89
  • Zlin Z-52-.jpg
    Zlin Z-52-.jpg
    156.5 KB · Views: 115
From Kryl'ya Rodine 5/1988,


here is the Zlin Z-52 project,with some data.
 

Attachments

  • Z-52.png
    Z-52.png
    30.5 KB · Views: 81
  • Z-52 data.png
    Z-52 data.png
    178.5 KB · Views: 84
Another Zlin-Moravan project I'm aware of is the Z-400, based on the Russian Technoavia Finist, but with a Canadian Orenda OE600A V-8 600hp engine. There was even a photoshopped picture of a border guard SM-92 Finist with the Orenda engine.
http://www.radio.cz/ru/rubrika/radiogazeta/u-samoleta-zlin-400-russkij-predok
http://www.cs-letectvi.cz/letadla/moravan-zlin-z-400
 

Attachments

  • Zlin Moravan Z-400 armed patrol aircraft proposal (PSed Finist pic).jpg
    Zlin Moravan Z-400 armed patrol aircraft proposal (PSed Finist pic).jpg
    38.9 KB · Views: 122
Could one of our native Russian speakers please translate, or give a short summary
of the text about the Z-52 ? My main questions: Is the canopy really circular, maybe
for better ground observation ? The model seems to show no sign of such a shape.
And is that low wing aircraft a derivative ?
 
Very little information. Short description of technical characteristics. The figure below shows the Fournier RF-8
 
Thank you Granit,


and what about circular canopy.
 
Many thanks indeed, Granit.
Made a comparison of upper and side view and that circular canopy just seems not actually to be
a part of the Z-52. and in Maverics post, it seems to be more a kind of earmark anyway.
 

Attachments

  • comp.jpg
    comp.jpg
    42.4 KB · Views: 70
Hi,

I want to explain the difference between Z-135 and Z-135 Crane drawings.

L + K magazine.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 45
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    25.7 KB · Views: 51
From L+K 24/1969.
 

Attachments

  • 1   24-1969.png
    1 24-1969.png
    93.7 KB · Views: 46
From L+K 7/1965,

a small Info about Z-35 flying crane Project.
 

Attachments

  • 1   7-1965.png
    1 7-1965.png
    286.9 KB · Views: 48
From L+K 1/1993,

the Projects Z-426 & Z-626.
 

Attachments

  • f.png
    f.png
    104.5 KB · Views: 47
From l+k 6/1993 & 7/1993.
 

Attachments

  • 1  6-1993.png
    1 6-1993.png
    88.6 KB · Views: 50
  • 1  7-1993.png
    1 7-1993.png
    55.9 KB · Views: 58
From L+K 13/1993,

here is some Zlin Projects.
 

Attachments

  • 1  13-1993.png
    1 13-1993.png
    143.5 KB · Views: 57
  • 2  13-1993.png
    2 13-1993.png
    364.5 KB · Views: 58
  • 3  13-1993.png
    3 13-1993.png
    4.7 MB · Views: 62
  • 4  13-1993.png
    4 13-1993.png
    5.2 MB · Views: 68
Hi,
the project of the engineer Mikula from 2001, who was a chief engineer at Moravan Otrokovice (Zlin) for many years. He led the development of the Z-35, Z-40, 42, 142 and Z-50.
Source: L + K
Ing.J.Mikula 2001.jpg
 
No, the picture was given without further specification in the L + K magazine in connection with the death of Mr. Mikula.
 
Hi,
the project of the engineer Mikula from 2001, who was a chief engineer at Moravan Otrokovice (Zlin) for many years. He led the development of the Z-35, Z-40, 42, 142 and Z-50.
Source: L + K
View attachment 645802

Interesting how he incorporated several contemporary concepts into a high-wing business jet.
First question: why a high-wing?

Note that the cabin pressure vessel is a simple cylinder with the wing structure completely outside. Then Engineer Mikula added a wing root, streamlined box to fair the wing roots into the fuselage ... common on low-wing passenger jets. We wonder why the entire main-wing trailing-edge is swept when most jet airliners now have flaps perpendicular to airflow ... for better lift at low-speeds.
They still needed landing gear sponsons to install LG outside the pressure cabin.
The V-tail was used on a few other light jets like Vision Jet, Cirrus Jet and Jet Sonex.
The V-tail surfaces look big enough for cruise, but we question if they are large enough for low-speed control, considering the short tail moment arm.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom