hesham: Perhaps I misunderstood your question.
.. about the Gull,it was never materialized...
As a production aircraft, no. Aerofile's "POP: 1" refers to the Argonaut H-24
Pirate simply being rebranded as the White
Gull. But was it really that simple? And did the
Gull 'materialize' beyond a re-branding exercise?
There's plenty of confusion. Although not confirmed, White Aircraft may have acted on their plan to increased the
Gull's power output. If Aerofiles is right, the H-24's original Menasco C-4
Pirate would be replaced in the
Gull by a 160 hp 6-cylinder Menasco B6 [iBuccaneer[/i].
But the
The Aircraft Yearbook 1939 has a photo caption (page 230, same image as yours) "powered by a Ranger engine" and text (page 413) mentioning a Ranger "6-410" for the White
Gull. Beside your
Flying Magazine ref, these are the only mentions that I've seen of a 'Ranger' powerplant for the
Gull. How reliable the
The Aircraft Yearbook series is as a source, I don't know.
Questions about the Howard Heindell-designed H-24
Pirate are another matter. Your image's caption notes "spruce, plywood, and fabric" construction For the record, E.R. Johnson's speculation in
American Flying Boats and Amphibious Aircraft: An Illustrated History that the H-24 "structure appears to be a metal hull with fabric-covered wings and tail surfaces" is only partially correct. In fact, the entire structure was covered with doped fabric - including the H-24's plywood-covered, spruce-framed hull.
Images of the H-24
Pirate raise questions about just how close the relationship was between the Argonaut and the
Gull. Have a glance at the attached photo and 3-view drawing purporting to show the sole H-24 prototype (reg. X15682). Now compare with that image of White
Gull above. What are the differences?
I count the following:
- Tapered, cantilever wings versus H-24's parallel chord with bracing struts to pylon;
- Faired engine pylon versus engine-mounting struts;
- Reshaped cockpit canopy covering;
- Faired in tailfin (possibly with high-mounted stabilizers);
- Longer stabilizer bracing struts;
- Revised (or possibly just unfaired) main undercarriage legs; and
- Repositioned, more forward-placed tailwheel.
Source:
Vintage Aircraft, vol 23, no 10, Oct 1995, page 8
That's quite
a lot of changes for a simple 're-branding' exercise. (I note that the
Gull is also missing its wing floats but presume those to be removable for purely land-based operations by this 'amphibion'.) What all of this signifies, I don't know. Any other opinions on connections between the H-24 and White
Gull?