Various Yugoslav Aircraft & Projects

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
26 May 2006
Messages
34,500
Reaction score
15,281
From Yugoslavia,

Rogozarski aircraft:
type-I :two seat unequal-span biplane intended as reconnaissance
aircraft.
SIM-II :was a parasol wing monoplane ,two seat trainer aircraft
powred by 100 hp Siemens radial engine.
SIM-VI :two seat dual-control tourer/trainer low-wing monoplane
powered by 50 hp Walter Mikron engine.
 
Rogozarski aircraft :

SIM-VIII :developed specifically as a two seat tourer from SIM-II.
SIM-IX :single seat trainer monoplane powered bu 160 hp Bramo
Sh 149 engine.
Bucos :two seat low wing monoplane primary trainer powered by
130 hp De Havilland Gipsy Major engine.
an early VTOL aircraft to Yugoslavia in this site:
www.yumodelclub.tripod..com/history_of_yugoslav_aviation/zucenko.htm
 
From Yugoslavia,

M.Mitrovich MMS.3 :twin boom light transport aircraft.
 

Attachments

  • Mitrovich-MMS-3-3-view.jpg
    Mitrovich-MMS-3-3-view.jpg
    36.5 KB · Views: 782
From Aerosvet 06-07,


here is a strange Yugoslavia aircraft,I don't know it was a project or not ?,it was
called Muzeja.
 

Attachments

  • Muzeja.png
    Muzeja.png
    227.2 KB · Views: 738
The word Muzeja is the genitive of the word Muzej which means Museum. The reader is asking if the magazine could publish the catalog of the Museum of Aviation in Belgrade, and he is asking for the 3-view picture of the Ikarus ŠM-1 biplane which is on the picture because he wants to build a model of it.
 
Hi,

for Fizir (Zmaj Co.),I found a mysteries for it;

-School Avion N - Gypsy with engine and Argus, made only a prototype
-Devoatin D.1 - reconstruction process fighter aircraft 1930-31 (maybe they meant Dewoitine ?)
-Dragon B-1 - reconnaissance aircraft with engines Gnome - Rhone and Cyclone (prototype ended
the war in 1941.)

http://www.vazduhoplovnetradicijesrbije.rs/index.php/biografije/56-dusan-stankov
 
Yes, Devoatin (Девоатин) refers to Dewoitine. I presume that Prof. Stankov took part in the refurbishing of Yugoslav Dewoitine D.1 fighters.

'Dragon' is just the English translation of Zmaj (Змај) ... ie the Fabrika aeroplana i hidroaviona Zmaj. So, the reference is to the Zmaj B-1 recce aircraft.

Likewise the 'Dragon' references under 'Unrealized Projects' also refer to Zmaj. So these are Stankov's 1933-34 fighter projects - the Zmaj Ž.L. 1 (Hispano-Suiza HS 12Nb); Ž.L. 2 (Gnome-Rhône K9); and Ž.L. 3 (supercharged G-R K9), and a 1934 twin-engined bomber - the Zmaj B.V.Z.
 
We must merge those topics;

https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,15706.msg188988.html#msg188988
 
Here is a four little known airplanes;

Minima-Svep I & II,Tse-tse,S.H.1-Sraka ;

 

Attachments

  • 001_minima.jpg
    001_minima.jpg
    40.9 KB · Views: 156
  • 002_minima.jpg
    002_minima.jpg
    48 KB · Views: 144
  • 004_minima.jpg
    004_minima.jpg
    44.2 KB · Views: 144
  • 006_minima.jpg
    006_minima.jpg
    50.6 KB · Views: 136
  • 015_minima.jpg
    015_minima.jpg
    65.2 KB · Views: 133
  • 001_tse.jpg
    001_tse.jpg
    63.2 KB · Views: 138
  • 003_tse.jpg
    003_tse.jpg
    55.1 KB · Views: 135
Hi,

Mr. Jože Zablatnik made a two-seat multi purpose biplane in 1912,and a sport airplane in 1913/14.

 

Attachments

  • zablatnik_1.jpg
    zablatnik_1.jpg
    28.4 KB · Views: 126
  • zablatnik_3.jpg
    zablatnik_3.jpg
    44 KB · Views: 142
From Krila 1/1996,

here is a single seat low-wing monoplane,called KS II,and designed by Mr. Anton Kuhelj,and powered by one 25 hp engine in 1935,I used the google translate,but I don't know if it was built or not ?.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    407.1 KB · Views: 137
  • 2.png
    2.png
    545.7 KB · Views: 172
Last edited:
According to Robert Resman, the designations KS IIa and KS IIb were used interchangeably. A further development was planned by a break-away group - the Ajaks (AJAKS = Ajdič, Jenko, Anton Kuhelj, Sportni). The Ajaks rebuild was planned with a 42 hp Zlin Perzy Persy II HO2 (replacing the KS II's 35 hp Anzani) circa 1938 but wasn't completed.

 
Last edited:
That's Zlín Persy II engine.
Yep, KS 1 Janez, three widely different machines built KS 1a, KS 1b, KS 1c.
 
draft of modern passenger aircraft
enver hadžialić
Hrvatska krila NDH
 

Attachments

  • 55247_96723579_DSC00723.JPG
    55247_96723579_DSC00723.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 210
Hi,

here is a a strange two ideas from Slovenian designers,

The first Slovenes to practice rockets were pyrotechnics; This majority of the session with Ferdinand Makuc from Gorizia was connected with the activity of Slovenian aviation pioneers. Makuc was also the first known victim of this profession in our country: when his workshop was blown up just before the start of the First World War, his wife and assistant lost their lives. Makuc befriended and collaborated with the Rusjan brothers. Julij Nardin, a professor of physics at the high school in Idrija, also belonged to this circle. As early as 1909, Nardin was engaged in various experiments and devices that worked on the basis of reaction. When he was building an airplane in 1909/10, but he didn't have the money to buy an engine for it, he was thinking about starting it with a (rocket?) Launch. In 1913, he recorded a friend's idea for a turbojet engine; Nardin's friend Franjo Bratina predicted supersonic speeds in aviation at the time, but later devoted his entire life to invention, especially the invention of the reaction aircraft engine, which he filed for patent in 1930, and the patent was granted two years later. Further developing this idea, he combined his original idea of a reaction drive with a rocket and in the mid-1960s designed an aircraft with all the characteristics of a flying saucer.

Julius Nardin designed a torpedo in 1914, for which he envisioned a rocket propulsion. An unmanned parent torpedo propelled in this way was supposed to sail close to the enemy, launch smaller torpedoes at it and return to the home port, where it would be operated by a program from a perforated strip instead of a crew. Because of this self-controlled automaton, and because he also developed an electronic tube, Nardin is considered the pioneer of cybernetics in Slovenia. With some other ideas - all from 1914 - he visionarily announced later rocket weapons: his water torpedo was to be fired with a cannon or thrown from an airplane in a special profession, which would fall off when passing from air to water, here however, the rocket propulsion system would start operating.

 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    98.2 KB · Views: 123
  • 2.png
    2.png
    28.1 KB · Views: 131
Last edited:
Did anyone hear about a RK26 Tigerschwalbe, which was built under license in Jugoslavia during the 30s? Raab mentioned this in his biography, but without any further notices. I have no usefull idea, what Jugoslav aircraft type it might be. The Zmaj Fizir FP-2 might be the closest design, however it does not match the RK26 dimensions in any way and it was already designed in 1933.
 
From Aeroplan 1991/1,

the Sveti Dorde Airplane.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    916.3 KB · Views: 60
Here is the Modli 8,9 & 10,

After the Modli-8 aircraft, Josip Modli designed and built the Modli 9 version and the two-seater Modli 10 version, which were never completed, because death prevented him from doing so.


 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    287.1 KB · Views: 36
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    152 KB · Views: 47
This looks very like the 'Luton Minor' aeroplane . . .

cheers,.
Robin.
 
Here is the Modli 8,9 & 10,

After the Modli-8 aircraft, Josip Modli designed and built the Modli 9 version and the two-seater Modli 10 version, which were never completed, because death prevented him from doing so.


I can't find any information about a Modli-10. The unfinished two-seat evolution of the Modli-8 was called Modli-9. There was no Modli-10.

An interesting fact is that the unfinished prototype of the Modli-9 194 was handed over to the Croatian Technical Museum (Zagreb). Does the plane still exist? Do drawings exist?
 
I can't find any information about a Modli-10. The unfinished two-seat evolution of the Modli-8 was called Modli-9. There was no Modli-10.

What ?,

Након авиона Модли-8, Јосип Модли је конструисао и саградио верзију Модли 9 и двоседу верзију Модли 10, које никада нису довршене, јер га је у томе смрт спречила.

After the Modli-8 aircraft, Josip Modli designed and built the Modli 9 version and the two-seater Modli 10 version, which were never completed, because death prevented him from doing so.
 
Josip Modli later (date unknown) designed a two-seater version named Modli-9, but it was never fully completed. Both the Modli-8 and the unfinished 9 were given to the Croatian Technical Museum (Zagreb) after the death of Josip Modli in 1974.
 
What ?,

Након авиона Модли-8, Јосип Модли је конструисао и саградио верзију Модли 9 и двоседу верзију Модли 10, које никада нису довршене, јер га је у томе смрт спречила.

After the Modli-8 aircraft, Josip Modli designed and built the Modli 9 version and the two-seater Modli 10 version, which were never completed, because death prevented him from doing so.

It would be nice if that Serbian Wikipedia page gave more references. The only external link makes no mention of any 'Modli 10' (nor the Modli-9, come to that). Still, a few things jump out there.

First, the Modli-8 was withdrawn from use c.1950 while Josip Modli lived on until 1974. So, if Modli's death occurred almost a quarter century later, how could that be a factor in preventing him from finishing his design(s)?

Second, no distinguishing details of the Modli-9 are given in the Wiki article but the 'Modli 10' is said to have been a "two-seater". If the latter is true, why not just say that both two-seat designs remained unfinished?
 
My dears,please don't forget this sentence


Not forgotten - I quoted it. I was simply bemoaning the paucity of references on that Serbian Wikipedia page.

That designs beyond the J.M.8 and Modli 8 were not completed is established. I was trying to draw attention to the use of "two-seater" as a pointless 'distinction'. The Wiki author seems unaware that the unfinished Modli 9 was itself to be a 2-seater.

Are any SPF members familiar with the collection of the Tehnički muzej Nikola Tesla in Zagreb? Serbian sources say that both the Modli 8 airframe and components of the unfinished Modli 9 have been held at Zagreb since 1974. But I can't seem to find any Croatian sources to confirm that information.
 
From Yugoslavia,

M.Mitrovich MMS.3 :twin boom light transport aircraft.

More Info from my files,

in
the 1930s, the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was not one of the world's major aircraft manufacturers, but despite this, several unusual and very interesting designs
were created in the country. In 1934, engineer Milenko Mitrović-Spirta,
technical director of the small Yugoslav aviation company Aeroput AD,
began designing a light four-seater passenger plane that could be used
for business, tourist, courier, mail transport flights, and also as a passenger
plane on short, rarely used routes.

The aircraft designed by Mitrović, designated MMS-3 after the designer's
initials , was a twin-engine high-wing monoplane with an unconventional
twin-fuselage layout with a central fuselage gondola suspended under the
wing and two thin tail booms, which were extensions of the engine nacelles
placed on the wing. The ends of the tail booms were connected by a
horizontal stabilizer, on the center of which a single vertical stabilizer was
mounted. This aerodynamic layout was tested in detail by Mitrović in March
1934 in the Eiffel wind tunnel in Paris. The designer then tried several configurations, including those with inline and radial engines, without cowlings
and with cowlings, placed at different distances from the fuselage gondola.
The ultimately selected layout was characterized by an aerodynamic
perfection of about 12, at that time achieved only by very good gliders.

The aircraft had an all-wooden structure, covered with plywood and canvas.
The richly glazed cabin, housing the pilot's and three passenger seats, was
located in the central fuselage gondola. The passenger seats could be
removed, and in their place various loads could be carried. The aircraft
was eventually powered by lightweight British Pobjoy "Niagara" radial engines
with an output of 66 kW (90 hp), covered with NACA covers. The engines were characterized by low fuel consumption and very quiet operation, which
ensured great comfort for passengers. The fuel tanks were placed inside
the fuselage parts of the wings, between the central fuselage gondola and
the tail booms. The tricycle landing gear with a tail wheel was fixed, with
the main wheels supported by the central fuselage gondola and engine
nacelles, and the movable tail wheel was placed under the rear part of the
fuselage gondola. The main wheels were covered with fairings, but the plane
often flew without them.

Work on the construction of the MMS-3 prototype began in mid-1934 and
was completed only at the end of 1935. The aircraft was built at the Aeroput company's own expense in Zemun near Belgrade. The aircraft's first flight
was carried out at the end of January 1936 by Aeroput's chief pilot Vladimir Strizhevski. Flight tests confirmed the initial design assumptions - the aircraft
had good performance and was very stable in flight throughout the entire
speed range, even with one engine switched off. In the summer of 1936, the aircraft received a certificate of airworthiness and the YU-SAR registration.
From that moment on, the aircraft began to be used in the Aeroput colours for transporting mail, press and business flights on routes to Sarajevo, Podgorica, Skopje, and many other smaller cities. During one such flight on the Belgrade-Podujevo-Skopje route on September 15, 1936, the plane suffered an engine failure and pilot Rodoljub Milovanović had to make a forced landing. The
slightly damaged machine was quickly repaired and by the end of 1937 it
had spent a total of 65 hours in the air, in 1938 - 79 hours, and in 1939 - 102
hours.

In 1940, the MMS-3 was used for testing the nose wheel landing gear. At that
time, Eng. Mitrović and Prof. Dr. Eng. Miroslav Nenadović were working on a project for a twin-engine light bomber and reconnaissance aircraft provisionally called NEMI , which was to have a similar aerodynamic system to that used in
the MMS-3, but a three-wheel landing gear with a nose wheel. However, this project was never implemented.

In March 1941, in view of the tense international situation around Yugoslavia,
the MMS-3 aircraft was taken over by the Yugoslav Air Force JKRV and incorporated into the 603. Pomocne Eskadrile (auxiliary squadron), where it
was to perform liaison, dispatch and courier tasks. Its further fate after the
German attack on Yugoslavia in April 1941 is not known in detail. However, according to eyewitness accounts, the aircraft was destroyed by its own
crew on a landing field near the village of Divac in the Valjevo region.

Before the outbreak of the war, the MMS-3 aircraft had aroused considerable interest in various countries, including France, Great Britain, Germany, and Czechoslovakia. There were even preliminary talks about selling a license for
the MMS-3 by Aeroput, but nothing came of these plans either. Ultimately,
only a single prototype remained in existence.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom