USAF/US NAVY 6th Generation Fighter Programs - F/A-XX, F-X, NGAD, PCA, ASFS news

[bobbymike]

The engine nacels are too big unless it's got 4 engines in their conceptual

Or it has 2 engines, but each would be so large and so powerful that they operate equal to 2 engines, perhaps more than twice that of the P&W F135 engines, currently among the most powerful fighter engines made. After all, its engines will be designed to be both adaptive and variable, meaning it can adjust itself according to flight regime, which greatly increases its range, and its fuel efficiency

I can’t see the nacelles in that picture am I missing something? Or can’t gauge their size.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

The engine nacels are too big unless it's got 4 engines in their conceptual

Or it has 2 engines, but each would be so large and so powerful that they operate equal to 2 engines, perhaps more than twice that of the P&W F135 engines, currently among the most powerful fighter engines made. After all, its engines will be designed to be both adaptive and variable, meaning it can adjust itself according to flight regime, which greatly increases its range, and its fuel efficiency

Or the nature of the engine requires a bigger exhaust - some kind of bypass to mix cold air with the exhaust, multiple flow paths for an adaptive engine, multi-mode engine, etc.

Or more likely we're just staring way too much at an artist's rendering again.

That is also possible too, might also help with reducing heat signatures for IR detection, otherwise it will also defeat the purpose of the NGAD being a new generation Stealth Fighter.

And yes, that is still pretty much a concept art (Most likely inspired by Rodrigo Avella's works), so obviously, the final, actual design might, and will be vastly different from the concept art itself.

$300m per plane in today's prices?

I believe one of the spokespersons for the program that went before Congress intimated that they would larger than a traditional fighter and cost hundreds of millions per copy, so that seems to be the case. Presumably the CCAs / UAVs of the program will be dramatically cheaper than a traditional fighter and the hope being that a flight of UAVs + the manned component is more capable than an equivalent, or even larger number, of opponent fighters.

Which is why the NGAD won't be replacing the F-22s on a one-for-one basis, instead, even fewer NGADs will be made, with the Drones compensating for the lack of numbers instead. It is designed that a single NGAD unit with its squadron of Loyal Wingmen drones will be equivalent to a dozen F-22s or a squadron of F-22s, regardless, they will be more effective in battle than several F-22s at once. Also, whether the price tag refers to only the NGAD manned fighter component or also includes the Loyal Wingmen drones is still up for debate.

According to Binkov's Battlegrounds' theories, there might only be 100 NGAD manned fighter components, with 500 Loyal Wingmen Drones to compensate for it, giving at least 5 Loyal Wingmen Drones for every NGAD manned fighter component unit. However, these figures might, and will be disputed, as there may actually be more NGAD manned fighter components planned, as well as more Loyal Wingmen Drones made for each NGAD manned component.

I like the design but it's a big aircraft alright with a price to match ($300M, wow!).

Same thoughts here, $300M is a lot more than the F-22 Raptor. And they stopped the F-22's production because it was allegedly too expensive, makes me mad just thinking about it.

They probably regretted stopping Raptor Production the moment current world trends went where it went. After all, the reason why they did it at that time was because they were primarily focused on fighting insurgents and terrorists on the Middle East, and didn't fully see the bigger global picture, if they ever did see it. As such, they considered the Raptor's production as a waste of money, time and other resources that can go to far more important projects (At that time), and so stopped its production.

In hindsight, it probably also saved them enough resources to find a successor to the Raptors, as the NGAD program officially began in 2014, 2 years after the last Raptors were produced.

The engine nacels are too big unless it's got 4 engines in their conceptual

Or it has 2 engines, but each would be so large and so powerful that they operate equal to 2 engines, perhaps more than twice that of the P&W F135 engines, currently among the most powerful fighter engines made. After all, its engines will be designed to be both adaptive and variable, meaning it can adjust itself according to flight regime, which greatly increases its range, and its fuel efficiency

I can’t see the nacelles in that picture am I missing something? Or can’t gauge their size.

It's a concept art, based from what concept artists made, they would obviously miss a few technical parts, so don't worry about the design, it isn't final yet.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

USN's NGAD or F/A-XX will go ahead before the DDG(X) and then the SSN(X)

CNO Gilday: Next-Generation Air Dominance Will Come Ahead of DDG(X) Destroyer - USNI News

ARLINGTON, Va. – First the fighter, then the destroyer and finally the submarine. That’s the order the Navy is set to introduce its next three major acquisition programs in the 2030s, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday said last week. The Navy’s next large surface warship program – now...

news.usni.org

 

[Forest Green]

View attachment 691347

I wonder if the $300mn price also includes 5 unmanned fighters, i.e. a system price for one NGAD.

 

[Josh_TN]

It is all quite theoretical at the moment. Also there will likely be multiple CCA types, so cost per UAV could fluctuate rather wildly. as well as the total number assigned to a fighter in given a situation. The low end seems to be XQ-58 or even UTAP-22 sized; those smaller, more disposable drones would be getting down to the cost of some types of ordnance. Kratos claims they can stamp out Q58s for 2 million a pop if USAF is willing to fund a large production run (like a hundred or two a year); I don't believe them honestly but it does give a sense of the price point they are looking at. I assume something much larger and more capable, at least the size of MQ-28, would also be paired with the NGAD.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

View attachment 691347

I wonder if the $300mn price also includes 5 unmanned fighters, i.e. a system price for one NGAD.

I mentioned that possibility in one of my responses yesterday:

Also, whether the price tag refers to only the NGAD manned fighter component or also includes the Loyal Wingmen drones is still up for debate.

However, I'm inclined to believe that it's the price of the manned fighter component itself, the drones might be vastly cheaper than that, maybe at least 10-50 million dollars or less.

Regardless, it does seem like the USAF is more than willing to spend that much money on these things for the sake of Deterrence. Whether the costs will be fruitful or not, it won't matter if the NGAD will not fire a single shot in anger throughout its entire life, the role of deterring any enemy air force, or any enemy armed forces for the matter, from doing something against the US or one of their allies, is vastly enough to fulfill its purpose.

It is all quite theoretical at the moment. Also there will likely be multiple CCA types, so cost per UAV could fluctuate rather wildly. as well as the total number assigned to a fighter in given a situation. The low end seems to be XQ-58 or even UTAP-22 sized; those smaller, more disposable drones would be getting down to the cost of some types of ordnance. Kratos claims they can stamp out Q58s for 2 million a pop if USAF is willing to fund a large production run (like a hundred or two a year); I don't believe them honestly but it does give a sense of the price point they are looking at. I assume something much larger and more capable, at least the size of MQ-28, would also be paired with the NGAD.

Yeah, 2 million is way too cheap for all the technologies they might implement on the drones. Also, a much larger drone than the MQ-28 might possibly be needed to house some, if not all of the required technologies that the drones might use. I think ones the size of the MQ-25 Stingray should be enough, as it will also ensure that they can go almost the same range as the manned fighter component itself, assuming that the planned range for the NGAD is a 1000+ miles, or even more than that, possibly double, triple or quadruple the distance.

Because IMO, the current Loyal Wingmen drones being planned and implemented are way too small. And while yes, being small for drones is important as it reduces their detection by the enemy, as well as their RCS, the types of drones required for the NGAD program have to both be capable of handling several highly advanced suites of weapons, avionics, sensors and other technologies that are normally put on more advanced manned fighter aircraft, as well as having the fuel efficiency to travel the same distance and range as the manned fighter components.

Besides, if the drones are almost as big as the manned fighter component, it can potentially visually confuse the enemy on which one is which, especially at very far distances, as well as confusing them on radar, as they might all have the same RCS size. In short, these things altogether would make it harder to distinguish between manned fighter and drone, and in both cases, they have to get up close and personal to tell the difference, which would never happen as they would be long shot down before they even figured it out.

Of couse there will be other important factors that can keep Loyal Wingmen Drones small, such as the absence of a pilot, therefore heavily reduced weight, and the miniaturization of technologies to the point that they can easily fit inside small drones, while providing the same capabilities as larger fighter aircraft, as well as other possible factors, but maybe if the Loyal Wingmen Drones are to be capable of providing extra offensive and defensive capabilities, as well as being able to travel alongside the manned fighter component all the way to their maximum range, then they should at least be beefed up greatly, so as to be able to full their mission as escorts and wingmen to the NGAD's manned fighter component.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

SMG Consulting says that the US Air Force is making experimental coatings and paints that will make the aircraft harder to see. This will be mainly added onto the NGAD and its drones once they are made, and several pre-existing aircraft, such as the so-called "Chrome Raptor" are being used as experimental testbeds for this innovative type of stealth technology.

SMG Consulting made this tweet in response to a user that asked whether Visual Stealth means giving the NGAD an optical camouflage option. While it appears not to be the case according to the response tweet (We might not have true light-bending paints for maybe a few years or decades, unless those already exist in some form or another, and are just hidden and classified to almost all levels, and the public), optical camouflage might be an interesting form of stealth and might be integral to the NGAD and future generations of stealth fighters should it ever be made.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1616152711308931073

View: https://twitter.com/SMG_Consulting/status/1616152711308931073/photo/1

 

[TomcatViP]

Is this a threat about SMG?

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

Is this a threat about SMG?

What do you mean "Threat"? Do you mean "Thread"? It was in relation to the NGAD post above, as they have recently started posting Infographics regarding the NGAD, and revealing some details regarding some of its specifics. If non-SMG sources regarding the NGAD do pop out and if I see them, I'll post it here all the same.

 

[TomcatViP]

There is much to none information in their pieces. Maybe this could be the subject of a dedicated thread.
We have had thread dedicated to speculative view of real design. Maybe this could be more appropriate.

 

[dark sidius]

Is this a threat about SMG?

What do you mean "Threat"? Do you mean "Thread"? It was in relation to the NGAD post above, as they have recently started posting Infographics regarding the NGAD, and revealing some details regarding some of its specifics. If non-SMG sources regarding the NGAD do pop out and if I see them, I'll post it here all the same.

SMG is not USAF or Lockheed Martin or Northrop , this is their opinion about NGAD not official USAF opinion.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

Is this a threat about SMG?

What do you mean "Threat"? Do you mean "Thread"? It was in relation to the NGAD post above, as they have recently started posting Infographics regarding the NGAD, and revealing some details regarding some of its specifics. If non-SMG sources regarding the NGAD do pop out and if I see them, I'll post it here all the same.

SMG is not USAF or Lockheed Martin or Northrop , this is their opinion about NGAD not official USAF opinion.

I'm fully aware of that, since someone in another thread pointed that out hours ago. In fact, I actually would agree with you on that, now that I knew. But even beforehand, I actually distrust all the information on their Infographics. (Primarily because I think the actual NGAD being worked on is truly beyond what the Infographic describes, in all terms and qualities, and everything else in between), as seen here:

Thus, the true nature of it is not yet known, and hence I also disagree with the SMG Consulting Infographic to an extent, especially with regards to the NGAD's size, range and cost.

(This was back when I thought some parts of SMG's Infographics were partially correct to some degree, but now I think all of it is not accurate to the actual NGAD as a whole, but does create some interesting points for discussion)

Besides, I recall that in an earlier message in this thread, I said outright that I doubt and distrust the information presented on the infographic, so while I might not have known that SMG Consulting is no official aerospace partner of the US Air Force, I had already considered their information regarding the NGAD as of doubtful authenticity, if only because I always assume that there's something far greater in all ways when it comes to the actual project at hand. And I only shared them here because it's relevant to the topic of this thread at hand, and opened some discussion regarding the NGAD as a whole, not that I think that the information presented is fully accurate to the NGAD, and anyone else that doubts is wrong or whatnot.

At the end of the day, their post is speculation, same as ours, we all know what everyone else says (Apart from the USAF and the companies involved in the NGAD project) would be speculation at best, and heresay at worst. Regardless, it allows for us to discuss and theorize on what the NGAD might be capable of, what it might cost, how far can it go, and anything else that has to do with it.

That has been my aim when sharing these posts: to make this thread active, and allow us to share our thoughts and speculations regarding the NGAD as a whole. And so far, I enjoyed the discussions being made here and being shared regarding this upcoming aircraft that I know will amaze us when it comes, regardless of what we think of it initially. So if the next time I share something about the NGAD, know that I don't hold such information presented in the posts as gospel truth (Because I personally think there's more than meets the eye in the information regarding them), but rather as means to help incite further conversation and discussion that I would love to participate in. That's all I want to do in here (And some other threads too).

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

There is much to none information in their pieces. Maybe this could be the subject of a dedicated thread.
We have had thread dedicated to speculative view of real design. Maybe this could be more appropriate.

I'll see if I could make one for NGAD designs soon enough, but I shared that image not to promote what the NGAD might look like, but as something to speculate and converse about the project as a whole, so to say. You can say that the Image is more or less, like a placeholder picture that gives you an idea of the actual thing, but is NOT what the full thing looks like

Maybe next time I share such an image or any news and information regarding the project, I should add some warning label here and there that says "All Information is based from Speculation Only", though prior warnings in this thread have also made that notion clear enough, so I thought everyone here would at least know that.

 

[DrRansom]

At $300million, the aircraft's primary role better be air-to-ground, not air-to-air.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

At $300million, the aircraft's primary role better be air-to-ground, not air-to-air.

Or both. Multi-Role seems to be the name of the game now, and it seems like the USAF needs a fighter that can both dominate the skies AND the ground, as well as a variety of other roles.

I also won't be surprised if the NGAD might have the capacity to go to Near-Space and be able to shoot down satellites, as anti-satellite missiles are also a thing now.

 

[martinbayer]

Please define your near space speculation in terms of altitude and velocity envelope.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

Please define your near space speculation in terms of altitude and velocity envelope.

Possibly at 80-120 km in altitude, near to beyond the Karman Line, velocity envelope I'm not familiar, but assuming that the aircraft might be equipped for Hypersonic flight, it may possibly reach that so-called velocity envelope. I might guess it can reach there at the same speed the fastest rockets does, while ensuring that the pilot will not die from the results, but anything is possible at this point.

Still, this is just speculation, and we obviously don't know what the NGAD's true capabilities are, so if I'm wrong, that's fine by me. Such a role might be reserved for a far future generation of fighter aircraft, or even the Space Force's possible future spacecraft anyways.

 

[paralay]

In the air-to-air mode, there are 2 short-range missiles and 10 medium-range missiles in the weapon bays

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

In the air-to-air mode, there are 2 short-range missiles and 10 medium-range missiles in the weapon bays

Maybe some of the Medium-Range Missiles can be replaced or upgraded with Extremely Long Range BVR ones at some point, possibly the Long Range Engagement Weapon (LREW) or the AIM-260 JATM or Joint Advanced Tactical Missile.

Or some other missile that's being developed that we don't know yet.

 

[paralay]

And how are things with the deck version? Is this NGAD or another project?

 

[F-2]

And how are things with the deck version? Is this NGAD or another project?

Do you mean the Navy carrier version? They are different but related

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

And how are things with the deck version? Is this NGAD or another project?

Do you mean the Navy carrier version? They are different but related

They are related due to name and technology being used, as well as many of the requirements expected of Sixth-Generation Fighters, but in everything else, they are vastly different.

For one, while the USAF NGAD or PCA might be able to become as big as a bomber in order to further increase range, weapon load, fuel capacity, sensor and avionics technology, Direct-Energy Weapons and other technologies, the Navy's NGAD might only have half or less than half the tech and upgrades presented due to their requirement to be carrier-capable effectively stunting their size limits.

 

[martinbayer]

Please define your near space speculation in terms of altitude and velocity envelope.

Possibly at 80-120 km in altitude, near to beyond the Karman Line, velocity envelope I'm not familiar, but assuming that the aircraft might be equipped for Hypersonic flight, it may possibly reach that so-called velocity envelope. I might guess it can reach there at the same speed the fastest rockets does, while ensuring that the pilot will not die from the results, but anything is possible at this point.

Still, this is just speculation, and we obviously don't know what the NGAD's true capabilities are, so if I'm wrong, that's fine by me. Such a role might be reserved for a far future generation of fighter aircraft, or even the Space Force's possible future spacecraft anyways.

I have no idea what the "so-called velocity envelope" you refer to might be, but you appear to be postulating a suborbital to near SSTO capability air superiority craft. I honestly, truly wish I could see any TRL6+ technology combination on the horizon to credibly support such a notion, but sadly I do not.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

Please define your near space speculation in terms of altitude and velocity envelope.

Possibly at 80-120 km in altitude, near to beyond the Karman Line, velocity envelope I'm not familiar, but assuming that the aircraft might be equipped for Hypersonic flight, it may possibly reach that so-called velocity envelope. I might guess it can reach there at the same speed the fastest rockets does, while ensuring that the pilot will not die from the results, but anything is possible at this point.

Still, this is just speculation, and we obviously don't know what the NGAD's true capabilities are, so if I'm wrong, that's fine by me. Such a role might be reserved for a far future generation of fighter aircraft, or even the Space Force's possible future spacecraft anyways.

I have no idea what the "so-called velocity envelope" you refer to might be, but you appear to be postulating a suborbital to near SSTO capability air superiority craft. I honestly, truly wish I could see any TRL6+ technology combination on the horizon to credibly support such a notion, but sadly I do not.

I see. Such a thing might be reserved for the far future then. We'll just have to wait and see what happens at this point

Regardless, the NGAD might be able to fulfill an anti-satellite role, even if it can't exceed the Karman Line. The missile just needs enough boost to be able to reach even higher than Low Earth Orbit, or not, either way it can still fulfill its role.

 

[Rhinocrates]

Regardless, the NGAD might be able to fulfill an anti-satellite role, even if it can't exceed the Karman Line. The missile just needs enough boost to be able to reach even higher than Low Earth Orbit, or not, either way it can still fulfill its role.

Given the right missile, an F-15 could - and did.

If a laser is the weapon and not a missile, a high-altitude aircraft with abundant payload and generating power would serve, and it needn't be manned. Variants of the 'RQ-180' or B-21 could serve (or if someone wants to get SOFIA out of mothballs...).

I think it's a role that's going to be seriously considered after what we've seen with Ukraine. Now would it be the Air Force or Space Force that would be fielding these? The battles in the corridors of the Pentagon could be as fierce as those in the air.

ASM-135 ASAT - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Rhinocrates]

And how are things with the deck version? Is this NGAD or another project?

Do you mean the Navy carrier version? They are different but related

Someone correct me if I'm wrong please. The F-111 supposedly exceeded the length that could be easily handled on a carrier elevator and consequently the navalised F-111B had a shorter nose. However, a quick search shows that the A-5 Vigilante had a length of 76 ft 6 in (23.32 m), the F-111B had a length of 68 ft 10 in (20.98 m) and the standard F-111 measured 73 ft 6 in (22.4 m).

There is a lot of speculation that the NGAD will be approximately F-111-sized (reasonable in my opinion). Does anyone have any idea of the limits of a Ford-class CVN's elevators? That would be one factor determining the difference between the Air Force and Navy versions.

Consider the drastic redesigns of the baseline YF-22 and YF-23 for naval use.

 

[martinbayer]

Regardless, the NGAD might be able to fulfill an anti-satellite role, even if it can't exceed the Karman Line. The missile just needs enough boost to be able to reach even higher than Low Earth Orbit, or not, either way it can still fulfill its role.

Given the right missile, an F-15 could - and did.

ASM-135 ASAT - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Absolutely no argument whatsoever in that excellent real world example, but as a reusable launch vehicle conceptual design engineer for the first part of my career I am acutely sensitive against any claims that appear to conflate or obfuscate the capabilities of an air launched missile with those of the carrier aircraft - that's why I asked for clarification in the first place.

 

[martinbayer]

Please define your near space speculation in terms of altitude and velocity envelope.

Possibly at 80-120 km in altitude, near to beyond the Karman Line, velocity envelope I'm not familiar, but assuming that the aircraft might be equipped for Hypersonic flight, it may possibly reach that so-called velocity envelope. I might guess it can reach there at the same speed the fastest rockets does, while ensuring that the pilot will not die from the results, but anything is possible at this point.

Still, this is just speculation, and we obviously don't know what the NGAD's true capabilities are, so if I'm wrong, that's fine by me. Such a role might be reserved for a far future generation of fighter aircraft, or even the Space Force's possible future spacecraft anyways.

"Velocity envelope" (however you intend to define that - as an aerospace engineer I have no idea of what that might mean as a standalone term, because it is typically coupled to flight altitude [hence the envelope concept in the first place] due to aerodynamic pressure and heating limits) kind of goes hand in hand with the altitude ceiling of aerodynamic flight due to aerothermodynamic limitations, but the speed that the "fastest rockets" (i.e. to date deep space probe multistage launch vehicles) attain is simply waaaaaaay beyond anything any super duper winged airbreathing fighter can attain in the forseeable future, so I remain mystified about your musings, but I look forward to being enlightened.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

Please define your near space speculation in terms of altitude and velocity envelope.

Possibly at 80-120 km in altitude, near to beyond the Karman Line, velocity envelope I'm not familiar, but assuming that the aircraft might be equipped for Hypersonic flight, it may possibly reach that so-called velocity envelope. I might guess it can reach there at the same speed the fastest rockets does, while ensuring that the pilot will not die from the results, but anything is possible at this point.

Still, this is just speculation, and we obviously don't know what the NGAD's true capabilities are, so if I'm wrong, that's fine by me. Such a role might be reserved for a far future generation of fighter aircraft, or even the Space Force's possible future spacecraft anyways.

"Velocity envelope" (however you intend to define that - as an aerospace engineer I have no idea of what that might mean as a standalone term, because it is typically coupled to flight altitude [hence the envelope concept in the first place] due to aerodynamic pressure and heating limits) kind of goes hand in hand with the altitude ceiling of aerodynamic flight due to aerothermodynamic limitations, but the speed that the "fastest rockets" (i.e. to date deep space probe multistage launch vehicles) attain is simply waaaaaaay beyond anything any super duper winged airbreathing fighter can attain in the forseeable future, so I remain mystified about your musings, but I look forward to being enlightened.

Well, what I say is also kinda off-putting so to speak. Nothing much but speculation, so whether it's sarcasm or not, no need to be mystified by it. I'm just a dumb, regular user who likes to talk about such things and make some idealizations. That's all

Obviously as an aerospace engineer, you guys hold more knowledge into this field than I am, so I'd rather hear more from you, to be honest, and see whether the way NGAD is moving forward is viable according to what you know or not.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

Regardless, the NGAD might be able to fulfill an anti-satellite role, even if it can't exceed the Karman Line. The missile just needs enough boost to be able to reach even higher than Low Earth Orbit, or not, either way it can still fulfill its role.

Given the right missile, an F-15 could - and did.

If a laser is the weapon and not a missile, a high-altitude aircraft with abundant payload and generating power would serve, and it needn't be manned. Variants of the 'RQ-180' or B-21 could serve (or if someone wants to get SOFIA out of mothballs...).

I think it's a role that's going to be seriously considered after what we've seen with Ukraine. Now would it be the Air Force or Space Force that would be fielding these? The battles in the corridors of the Pentagon could be as fierce as those in the air.

ASM-135 ASAT - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I think it might be both branches that will field anti-satellite weapons but primarily the stocks will be used by the Space Force abord possible mature versions of the X-37 Spaceplanes. As these weapons are not Nuclear Weapons or WMDs, they should theoretically not violate the Outer Space Treaty that was signed in 1966.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

And how are things with the deck version? Is this NGAD or another project?

Do you mean the Navy carrier version? They are different but related

Someone correct me if I'm wrong please. The F-111 supposedly exceeded the length that could be easily handled on a carrier elevator and consequently the navalised F-111B had a shorter nose. However, a quick search shows that the A-5 Vigilante had a length of 76 ft 6 in (23.32 m), the F-111B had a length of 68 ft 10 in (20.98 m) and the standard F-111 measured 73 ft 6 in (22.4 m).

There is a lot of speculation that the NGAD will be approximately F-111-sized (reasonable in my opinion). Does anyone have any idea of the limits of a Ford-class CVN's elevators? That would be one factor determining the difference between the Air Force and Navy versions.

Consider the drastic redesigns of the baseline YF-22 and YF-23 for naval use.

Not sure if there is any difference between the Nimitz-Class and Gerald R. Ford-Class Elevators in terms of design (Other than the Gerald R. Ford-Class having 1 less elevator), but according HowStuffWorks' article on the Aircraft Carrier, a single Nimitz-Class Elevator is "big enough and powerful enough to lift two 74,000-pound (~34,000-kg) fighter jets." This means that theoretically, they can carry at most 148,000-150,000 pounds of jets, and if the Navy might aim for a large manned fighter component size for their F/A-XX, then perhaps 150,000 pounds might be their maximum weight classification for such aircraft. It could be even less so as to save on weight and allow other stuff to be carried up at the same time.

Update: I found an article by Huntington Ingalls Industries (Yes, the guys that made the Gerald R. Ford and the other Aircraft Carriers), and they have described the dimensions for the Gerald R. Ford's elevators:

Length: 85 Feet (25.908 Meters)
Width: 52 Feet (15.8496 Meters)
Weight: 120 Tons (108,862.2 Kilograms, 240,000 Pounds)

So assuming this information from the article is fully correct, maybe the 150,000 Pound estimate still stands, or it can be a bit more, as the rest of the weight goes to the Elevator itself and its entire systems. As such, an aircraft the length of the F-111 or more, and also at the same weight class, will definitely fit in the Gerald R. Ford's elevators.

 

[Josh_TN]

The size of the elevators on the Wasp class were a major limitation of the F-35 program IIRC. Though F/A-X would avoid that requirement.

 

[paralay]

Gerald R. Ford-Class Elevators

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

Gerald R. Ford-Class Elevators

How about Crosswise? How will that work? Because I think that should the F/A-XX be made, only one of them may be carried by an elevator at a time.

Ok, turns out that it could fit in after all.

 

[red admiral]

Someone correct me if I'm wrong please. The F-111 supposedly exceeded the length that could be easily handled on a carrier elevator and consequently the navalised F-111B had a shorter nose.

Wasn't this about pilot view downwards over the nose? Hence if the cockpit is in the same place for structural commonality, then the noseneeds to be shorter?

 

[X-39]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1615330441388756992

View: https://twitter.com/SMG_Consulting/status/1615330441388756992
View attachment 691314

Aaand... we're officially back in the 80s misinformation era (personally not me, i wasn't even born) I think we all can agree on that there is essentially ZERO chance the NGAD will approximate anything like this. If this LM model had any merit to begin with, they made sure to shine a light on it that strips it of any plausible credibility when seen from above, with a little help from SMG staff, (#1. Fattening the fuselage resulted in it resembling something else (see images below) #2 SMG staff also decided that funky teardrop canopy wasn't enough, so they added some serration shaping which would be an even more bizarre thing to do when (not that much of an issue apparently) #3 There is no planform alignment of any kind) instantly relegating it to the same internet section where all of his 95736123 Deviantart superfighter Sci-Fi cousins roam around. just like Loral's F-19 and other purely artistic otherwordly illustrations did back then in magazines, model kits & videogames.

Nevermind.

 

[paralay]

There were no official images for the F-117. Even the name was unknown.

 

[Dreamfighter]

There were no official images for the F-117. Even the name was unknown.

I assume he is mostly referring to (or thinking about) all the concept-images about the ATF that floated around back then.

 

[La-Fuente Technologies]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1615330441388756992

View: https://twitter.com/SMG_Consulting/status/1615330441388756992
View attachment 691314

Aaand... we're officially back in the 80s misinformation era (personally not me, i wasn't even born) I think we all can agree on that there is essentially ZERO chance the NGAD will approximate anything like this. If this LM model had any merit to begin with, they made sure to shine a light on it that strips it of any plausible credibility when seen from above, with a little help from SMG staff, (#1. Fattening the fuselage resulted in it resembling something else (see images below) #2 SMG staff also decided that funky teardrop canopy wasn't enough, so they added some serration shaping which would be an even more bizarre thing to do when (not that much of an issue apparently) #3 There is no planform alignment of any kind) instantly relegating it to the same internet section where all of his 95736123 Deviantart superfighter Sci-Fi cousins roam around. just like Loral's F-19 and other purely artistic otherwordly illustrations did back then in magazines, model kits & videogames.

Nevermind.

By extension, SMG also took much from Rodrigo Avella's work, the concept art they use resembles more his F-X design than any of Lockheed Martin's designs.

 

[X-39]

By extension, SMG also took much from Rodrigo Avella's work, the concept art they use resembles more his F-X design than any of Lockheed Martin's designs.

Not really: https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/th...ams-f-a-xx-f-x-ngad-pca-asfs.3536/post-559874