Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Please tell me that you are not seriously suggesting that this unattributed source should be taken seriously.So an unidentified contributor to Wikipedia, possibly a spotty teenager, alleges on 25 June 2005 that Canadian plutonium was incorporated into the UK bomb programme. He produces no evidence in support of that assertion, although having had five years to do that, AND YOU BELIEVE HIM?Ye Gods! Save us! Save us from people who believe that what they read on Wikipedia is the Gospel Truth Brought Down From The Mountain!Why is it Zootycoon that reputable academic researchers are not contributing to Wikipedia in large numbers?Could it be that after they have sweated blood over a carefully researched and well-referenced piece of research, that within ten minutes of having posted it onto Wikipedia, some spotty high-school mischief-maker can (and does) edit it to draw completely different conclusions?These forums have their problems, but at least the contributors here expect and require posters to provide some evidence. Because without evidence a posting means diddly-squat.
Please tell me that you are not seriously suggesting that this unattributed source should be taken seriously.
So an unidentified contributor to Wikipedia, possibly a spotty teenager, alleges on 25 June 2005 that Canadian plutonium was incorporated into the UK bomb programme. He produces no evidence in support of that assertion, although having had five years to do that, AND YOU BELIEVE HIM?
Ye Gods! Save us! Save us from people who believe that what they read on Wikipedia is the Gospel Truth Brought Down From The Mountain!
Why is it Zootycoon that reputable academic researchers are not contributing to Wikipedia in large numbers?
Could it be that after they have sweated blood over a carefully researched and well-referenced piece of research, that within ten minutes of having posted it onto Wikipedia, some spotty high-school mischief-maker can (and does) edit it to draw completely different conclusions?
These forums have their problems, but at least the contributors here expect and require posters to provide some evidence. Because without evidence a posting means diddly-squat.
