yasotay said:When THE elite flight units of the US Department of Defense have this most improbable of situations occur, when taken into account with the recent revelations as to the status of the US Navy aircraft fleet in the Pacific, one can only hope that leadership will see the warning signs that these tragic events are.
Airplane said:yasotay said:When THE elite flight units of the US Department of Defense have this most improbable of situations occur, when taken into account with the recent revelations as to the status of the US Navy aircraft fleet in the Pacific, one can only hope that leadership will see the warning signs that these tragic events are.
I had this conversation about 10 years ago about the aging USAF and USN equipment with a retired brig gen, and his thinking was that no one will care until fighters start crashing in neighborhoods and then the people will wake up. I now think it'll take a fighter crashing into a school before the populace cares about refurbishing the services with new airframes.
Jeb said:Airplane said:yasotay said:When THE elite flight units of the US Department of Defense have this most improbable of situations occur, when taken into account with the recent revelations as to the status of the US Navy aircraft fleet in the Pacific, one can only hope that leadership will see the warning signs that these tragic events are.
I had this conversation about 10 years ago about the aging USAF and USN equipment with a retired brig gen, and his thinking was that no one will care until fighters start crashing in neighborhoods and then the people will wake up. I now think it'll take a fighter crashing into a school before the populace cares about refurbishing the services with new airframes.
Nope, that's when the general public will start refusing to allow overflights of populated areas. DOD does not have a plan or program to reach out to taxpayers and inspire us to re-capitalize defense, and even if it did, it'd have to be damn good to outperform the media's opposition.
kaiserd said:Jeb said:Airplane said:yasotay said:When THE elite flight units of the US Department of Defense have this most improbable of situations occur, when taken into account with the recent revelations as to the status of the US Navy aircraft fleet in the Pacific, one can only hope that leadership will see the warning signs that these tragic events are.
I had this conversation about 10 years ago about the aging USAF and USN equipment with a retired brig gen, and his thinking was that no one will care until fighters start crashing in neighborhoods and then the people will wake up. I now think it'll take a fighter crashing into a school before the populace cares about refurbishing the services with new airframes.
Nope, that's when the general public will start refusing to allow overflights of populated areas. DOD does not have a plan or program to reach out to taxpayers and inspire us to re-capitalize defense, and even if it did, it'd have to be damn good to outperform the media's opposition.
And does anybody know the actual causes of the crashes yet?
Or anything like informed speculation on the specific causes?
If age/ fatigue was a factor then by all means decry that but perhaps best to wait for some facts to emerge.
Airplane said:The Hornets are for a fact old and falling apart. Someone else would have to chime in about the hours and build dates on the t-birds.
Airplane said:Equipment is wearing out. I bet the reason for both is how old the birds are getting.
GTX said:Airplane said:The Hornets are for a fact old and falling apart. Someone else would have to chime in about the hours and build dates on the t-birds.
Airplane said:Equipment is wearing out. I bet the reason for both is how old the birds are getting.
How about we await the official investigations before making such statements?
+++A fair point, given that the aircraft of the flight demonstration teams are arguably the best kept aircraft in the inventory