The Development and Modernizations of the Nelson class

Tzoli

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
1 February 2011
Messages
2,687
Reaction score
2,796
Here I present the Development of the Nelson class Battleships HMS Nelson and Rodney, their various looks but more precisly the numerous refit proposals the Royal Navy envisioned for these two ships.

First Part: The Preliminaries
The final battleship design which became the Nelson class could be originated in the immidiate post war period of the 1920-21 Capital Ship series worked out just before the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 which included the N3 battleship and G3 battlecruiser proposals, but these will be part of a different thread.

The first two designs which eventually led to the Nelson class development were actually not Battleship designs but rather Battlecruisers the F2 and F3 designs. Their design work was ended in 1921 November.

Design F2 Battlecruiser
dhr00ce-4d61fe95-0a1d-443c-a606-47bf98b593b9.png


Design F2 was developed from the cancelled G3 design but as the WNT set the standard displacement of capital ships to 35.000tons major weight reductions had to be done. The Length was reduced by 30meters, speed by 2knots, Main armament was changed to 3 twin 15"/50 BL Mark II guns instead of the 16"/45 BL Mark I's, Secondary armament to 4 twin and 4 single 6"/50 BL Mark XXII guns instead of the 8 twins of G3 while the AA guns of 6 single 4,7"/40 QF Mark VIII and 8x multiple Pom-Poms remained the same, though the official drawings does not show the locations of the 4,7" AA guns the empty space aft on the deck is a clear indication of their proposed location in my opinion.
The armament layout was altered as well instead of the Bridge structure separating the 1st and 2nd turrets with the 3rd now all turrets are moved forward of the Bridge and the 3rd or X turret became the superfiring one in what was later adopted by the Japanese in the Mogami class cruisers. Secondary armament placed close o the bridge rather having in two groups as in G3. Heavy AA armament allocated aft while the Pom-Poms were placed next to the funnel and on the Stern.
The reduction of maximum speed resulted in smaller engineering compartment and together with the reduction in armament the citadel area which has to be armored shrunk considerably but still this was not enough to reach the desired displacement limit so armour thickness changed as well. Main belt incline altered to 18° from the prvious 25°, while Machinery Belt thickness remained at 305mm or 12" the Magazines belt reduced by 1inch from 356 to 330mm or 14" to 13". Deck armour was reduced by half and one inch respectively so from 102mm to 89mm over Machinery and from 203mm to 178mm over Magazines.
Engine power reduced from 180.000shp and 4 shafts to 112.000shp 2 shafts and speed from 32knots to 30knots.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 219,45 (pp) x 231,65 (oa) 32.3 x 10,4 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 112.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 56km/h (30knots)
Range: 13.000km (7.000nm)
Armour: 330mm Belt over Magazines, 305mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 178mm Deck over Magazines, 89mm over Machinery
Armaments:
3x2 15"/50 (381mm/50) BL Mark II Cannons,
4x2,4x1 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes

Based on official drawing:

Design F3 Battlecruiser
dhqsa98-605922f0-b56f-44b8-91bb-0bd01291358d.png


Design F3 was developed in parallel with the previous F2 but utilizing triple instead of twin turrets which resulted in considerable increase in armament weight and such this had to be compensated with reductions elsewhere. But instead of sacrificing armour for the extra armament, speed and thus machinery power was reduced.
Hull wise F3 became shorter by a bit more than 6 meters, compared to F2, while hull width remained the same. As mentioned the main armament was changed from 3 twin 15" to 3 triple 15"/50 BL Mark II guns in the same layout as F2 but Secondary armament was reduced to just 4 twin mountings. AA weaponry unchanged.
Armour wise F3 only differs in having uniform 305mm or 12" Belt armour instead of the 13/12" of F2.
As stated above the weight allocated for the extra armament came from the Machinery section, as such Engine power reduced to 96.000shp and speed to 29knots.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 213,36 (pp) x 225,55 (oa) 32.3 x 8,7 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 96.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 54km/h (29knots)
Range: 13.000km (7.000nm)
Armour: 305mm Belt inclined at 18°, 178mm Deck over Magazines, 89mm over Machinery
Armaments:
3x3 15"/50 (381mm/50) BL Mark II Cannons,
4x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes

Based on official drawing:

Design O3 Battleship Variant 1:
Yet to acquire official drawings to create this one
In the mean time here are the sketches from British Battleships 1919-1945 by Roger A. Burt:
View: https://i.imgur.com/BtCNeoD.png


The second O3 design (The first one was a modified N3 variant but the letter officially was not allocated to the design due to it not being submitted formally) was the actual design whcih was developed into what became the Nelson Class. The design underwent a number of changes and tweaks before reaching adulthood.
DNC (Director of Naval Constructions) started working on the project on 1921 December and used the F3 Battlecruiser design as a basis but armament changed to the maximum allowable gun calibre, so 16" by the request of Admiral of the Fleet David Richard Beatty. Twelve 6" guns , Six 4,7" AA and 4 Multiple Pom-Poms. Belt armour would be 14" over Magazines, 13" over Machinery while Deck to be 8" and 4-5" respectively. This proto design had a displacement of 35.370tons.
Naval Architect Edward Lewis Attwood proposed variants based on this data. This is the first variant which uses the same turret layout as F3 the speed of 23knots or 46km/h with a powerplant of 46.000shp with 8 boilers, their placement reversed to that of the previous designs having the Turbines being forward and thus partly under the Bridge while the Boilers located aft so the funnel be located as far from the Bridge structure as possible. The hull only 2m longer than that of the Nelsons and Standard Displacement stated being 35.550tons.
As mentioned the main armament layout was the same as of design F3 eg the 1st and 2nd 16" turrets are on the same level and the 3rd superfiring the 2nd all positioned forward of the Bridge structure. Secondary armament was distributed in 6 twin turrets, 3 on each side, in a pyramidical arrangement (like on the Nelsons) but next to the Bridge while as usual the AA armament concentrated aft.
He also adjusted the deck armour to reduce tonnage instead of the desired 8" and 5" deck the new protective values became 7,5 and 5" respectively aobve Magazines and Machinery.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 204,22 (pp) x 218,54 (oa) 31.7 x 9,14 meters
Displacement: 35.550tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 191mm Deck over Magazines, 127mm over Machinery, 102mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
4x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes
2x Aircrafts to be launched from turret tops presumably No.1 and No.3

Design O3 Battleship Variant 2:
Yet to acquire official drawings to create this one
In the mean time here are the sketches from British Battleships 1919-1945 by Roger A. Burt:
View: https://i.imgur.com/BtCNeoD.png


The 2nd Variant of the O2 design introduces the final main armament layout which was adopted for the Nelson class eg the 2nd or B turret superfiring the 1st and 3rd turrets. The 4,7" AA armament was revised somewhat introducing twin mounts on the fantail, but otherwise the design remains the same as of variant 1.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 204,22 (pp) x 218,54 (oa) 31.7 x 9,14 meters
Displacement: 35.550tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 191mm Deck over Magazines, 127mm over Machinery, 102mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
2x2 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes
2x Aircrafts to be launched from turret tops presumably No.2 and No.3

Design O3 Battleship Variant 3:
Yet to acquire official drawings to create this one
In the mean time here are the sketches from British Battleships 1919-1945 by Roger A. Burt:
View: https://i.imgur.com/BtCNeoD.png


The 3rd variant uses the same layout for the main turrets as the 1st variant but the secondary 6" twin turrets moved somewhat more aft to clear from the blast effects of the Main turret if firing at extreme aft angles. The 4,7" AA armament was as in the no.2 so twin mounts on the fantail and the Tripod mast orientation reversed. Tweaking with the design freed up some tonnage which allowed the install of an aft Main battery director and rangefinder. Otherwise the design remains the same as of variant 1.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 204,22 (pp) x 218,54 (oa) 31.7 x 9,14 meters
Displacement: 35.550tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 191mm Deck over Magazines, 127mm over Machinery, 102mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
2x2 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes
2x Aircrafts to be launched from turret tops presumably No.1 and No.3


Design P3:
Yet to acquire official drawings to create this one
In the mean time here are the sketches from British Battleships 1919-1945 by Roger A. Burt:
View: https://i.imgur.com/BtCNeoD.png


Design P3 together with Q3 were alternative proposals to save weight by using the 15"/50 BL Mk II guns in triple turrets. The gained tonnage, approx 1.100tons went into armament and armour but the sources are in error here I think. Despite offering 1.100tons for armour the actual armour values are worse having 10" Belt over Machinery rather 13" while deck of the same are having 3,5" rather 5". This might be because the armoured area was incresed considerably.
Visually P3 is identical to that of O3 Variant 1
These versions seems to be unfinished because the desire for 8 twin 6" secondary guns and 6 single 4,7" AA guns were not shown on the sketch or lack space for them altogether.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 204,22 (pp) x 218,54 (oa) 31.7 x 9,14 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 256mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 191mm Deck over Magazines, 89mm over Machinery, 102mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 15"/50 (381mm/50) BL Mark II Cannons,
8x2 or 4x3,2x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes
2x Aircrafts to be launched from turret tops presumably No.1 and No.3


Design Q3:
Yet to acquire official drawings to create this one
In the mean time here are the sketches from British Battleships 1919-1945 by Roger A. Burt:
View: https://i.imgur.com/BtCNeoD.png


Design Q3 together with P3 were alternative proposals to save weight by using the 15"/50 BL Mk II guns in triple turrets. The gained tonnage, approx 1.100tons went into armament and armour but the sources are in error here I think. Despite offering 1.100tons for armour the actual armour values are worse having 10" Belt over Machinery rather 13" while deck of the same are having 3,5" rather 5". This might be because the armoured area was incresed considerably.
Visually P3 is basically a reduced scale N3 with the 3rd turret positioned behind the Bridge structure but instead of having an entire deck behind the 3rd turret like on N3 here only small structural elements are located on the main deck like an intake structure around the funnel and a smaller deck for the tripod mast aft. Boat stowage is questionable as the space allocated for them seems quite small.
These versions seems to be unfinished because the desire for 8 twin 6" secondary guns and 6 single 4,7" AA guns were not shown on the sketch or lack space for them altogether.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 204,22 (pp) x 218,54 (oa) 31.7 x 9,14 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 256mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 191mm Deck over Magazines, 89mm over Machinery, 102mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 15"/50 (381mm/50) BL Mark II Cannons,
8x2 or 4x3,2x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes
2x Aircrafts to be launched from turret tops presumably No.2 and No.3


Design O3 (Modified)
dhqjpmy-82211342-e85f-489a-8e95-7507433625cb.png


This drawing shows the Nelson class semi-final design as signed in 1922 January. This is is still not the Nelson as built but the differences are mostly minor. As the design evolved and the new technologies and equipment being developed took shape so does the weight of the new systems become known, most of the time heavier then anticipated while the requirement for six 4,7" guns, Pom-Pom armament (4 mountings) and searchlight number (4) together with the 16" main and 6" secondary armament remained the same. To cope with this DNC reduced the deck armour over Magazines from 191 to 171mm and over Machinery from 127 to 108mm, slightly reduce armour of the gun shields and corners of the main armament but increase the 6" turrets armour 1,5 and the forward part of the control tower to 2". These changes required to remain within the 35.000ton displacement limit.
Visually the most notable difference are the curved deck around the 6" twin turrets rather the angular one of the final design, the 6" Director Control Towers are located in front of the tripod Mainmast rather aft close to the aft 16" DCT, and the 5th ad 6th 4,7" AA guns were located on the stern one behind the other rather as side by side. Boat stowage is a bit different as well with a small platform overhand the first pair of 6" turrets to provide extra space.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 204,22 (pp) x 218,54 (oa) 31.7 x 9,14 meters
Displacement: 35.500tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 171mm Deck over Magazines, 108mm over Machinery, 102mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes

Based on official drawing
 
Second Part: The 1920-30's
In this part I show the Nelson class and mostly Nelson as looked like prior to World War II, the number of minor refits and modifications and the pre-war modernization proposals for the class.

Nelson Class as Finished
dhqayvx-aa0bcea7-08a7-4d41-be28-aa3f7427c09b.png


The Nelson class battleships HMS Nelson and HMS Rodney was the most powerful and most unique looking battleships that served His Majesty's Royal Navy and were also the first capital ships to be built under the restrictions of the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 and to fully incorporate the lessons of World War 1. The class' design heritage could be traced back to the 1920-21 capital ship studies which created the abortive N3 and G3 designs but more clearly the F2 and F3 battlecruiser studies of 1922 which I've posted earlier. DNC and Naval Architect Edward Lewis Attwood eventually created the final design to which the Nelsons were built (Design O3).
There were slight differences between the semi final O3 (Modified) and the final Nelson design. Visally the most notable difference is the lack of multiple Pom-Pom mounts which were mounted much later on the two ships due to the long development of the gun mount (Temporary 8 single older Pom-Poms were mounted instead) but there were also unseen differences like further reduced deck armour to cope with the ever increasing requirements of the Admiralty for new equipment and finalizing the in development ones which all increased tonnage. Some changes to the deck structures and placement of the aft secondary DCTs.
The class stirred up the stagnant waters of the world navies design boards by not only showing the possibility of creating a heavily armed and well armoured design on limited displacement, using novel features and new technologies (like inclined belt armour, Combined Gun Directors and Rangefinders and heavy AA guns) but by the unique layout of the ships main armament! The all forward triple 16" turrets allowed maximalizing the firepower on the smallest available area.
While these new aspects were vehemently researched in the world navies in the coming years for designing new warships, only parts of the new technologies were adopted for new capital ships and onyl the French went as far as to build all forward capital ships, the 2-2 Donkerque and Richelieu class warships altought with only 2 turrets forward rather then 3.
Nelson and Rodney saw extensive use in WW2 due to thier immense firepower but this also meant that the long overdue refits and upgrades were implemented only partly or not at all despite the large number of Projects the RN envisioned to modernize these two unique vessels.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 33.313tons (standard), 41.250tons (full load)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
8x1 40mm/39 QF Mk II AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes

Nelson Class 1932 Refit Proposal
dhq49iq-0dc85b9b-6805-468a-9863-cd9f733a124a.png


The Photo of Rodney in 1932 shows that by this time the RN was decided to install the original Pom-Pom outfit for the two ships. 4 mountigns were to be installed on the ships and the photo shows that at least two were to be located at the base of the Tower strcutre partly recessed in it while the 2nd pair either in place of the Torpedo Director Towers or next to the aft main gunnery director tower. Eventually only 2 multiple Pom-Poms were installed by 1936 (one in 1933 and another in 1934/35) in place of the Torpedo Director Towers.
The drawing shows the likely placement of these 4 AA gun mountings with the added Mk I HACS (High-Angle Control Station) on top of the mast and two Pom-Pom directors.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 33.313tons (standard), 41.250tons (full load)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes

Photos of HMS Rodney showing the recess:
View: https://i.imgur.com/YZDYyjX.jpeg

View: https://i.imgur.com/Um2fynv.jpeg

View: https://i.imgur.com/uxbsaEX.jpeg


Nelson Class in 1933
dhpu61z-d9f3cdd2-96df-4ae7-a777-c03392ec39a3.png


This drawing shows how the class looked like in 1933/34 when they received their first Octuple Pom-Pom mountings. At first only one such mounting was installed on the right side in place of the Torpedo Director Tower, but the refit included the Mk I HACS (High-Angle Control Station) installment on top of the mast as well as platform extension at the sides of the Director Control Platform for the the Pom-Pom directors and the extension of the bridge.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 33.313tons (standard), 41.250tons (full load)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
1x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes

Nelson Class in 1936
dhppzp0-b94be661-f1c3-4166-907d-54ad09323460.png


This drawing shows how the class but mostly HMS Nelson looked like in 1936 just before the Spanish Civil War and after they received their second Octuple Pom-Pom mounting. Provision was made to install a catapult atop the 3rd turret but only Rodney received it though and Aircraft crane was installed on both ships. Later in 1937 plans were proposed to improve the deck armour of the two ships as well as an electrical overhaul and installment of two Mark III HACS, but in the end only Nelson received most of this refit.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 33.313tons (standard), 41.250tons (full load)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes

Nelson Class 1936 Modernization Scheme A
dhphifb-94c3b697-c24f-4c56-8b39-0c6667521314.png


In 1936 July, plans were drawn up to Modernize the class. The changes include the armouring the lower forward deck area to protect it against aerial bombs, move the steering gear to be better protected from underwater attack, increase the height of the funnel, fit the new HACS Mk III (Two sets), installation of aircraft facilities and new AA armament.
3 different schemes were proposed, this drawing shows the first among these.
Apart from the changes above, in scheme A the aircraft facilities included the installation of a catapult on the roof of the 3rd or X turret and space for at least 2 floatplanes. Other changes included the complete removal of the 6" and 4,7" armament and replace them with 8 twin 5,25" DPAA gun turrets with the addition of 4 more Octuple Pom-Poms for a total of 6.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes
2 Supermarine Walrus Floatplanes


Nelson Class 1936 Modernization Scheme B
dhp8unq-063056ad-1f9a-45a5-aa00-e9037ee9e846.png


In 1936 July, plans were drawn up to Modernize the class. The changes include the armouring the lower forward deck area to protect it against aerial bombs, move the steering gear to be better protected from underwater attack, increase the height of the funnel, fit the new HACS Mk III (Two sets), installation of aircraft facilities and new AA armament.
3 different schemes were proposed, this drawing shows the second among these.
Apart from the changes above, in scheme B the aircraft facilities included a full hanger structure around the funnel and catapult installation in place of the boat stowage. I choose a rotating catapult though it was not clear what kind of launch facilities were envisioned from the sources I had. Other changes included the complete removal of the 6" and 4,7" armament and replace them with 10 twin 4,5" AA BD or Between Deck gun turrets with the addition of 4 more Octuple Pom-Poms for a total of 6 of which I placed 2 on top of the Hanger and another two in place of the aft 6" Director Control Tower.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
10x2 4,5"/50 (114mm/45) QF Mk I Guns,
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes
3 Supermarine Walrus Floatplanes


Nelson Class 1936 Modernization Scheme C
dhozfba-91c49b70-84b8-4e27-b08f-20c9870bea3c.png


In 1936 July, plans were drawn up to Modernize the class. The changes include the armouring the lower forward deck area to protect it against aerial bombs, move the steering gear to be better protected from underwater attack, increase the height of the funnel, fit the new HACS Mk III (Two sets), installation of aircraft faculties and new AA armament.
3 different schemes were proposed, this drawing shows the third among these.
Apart from the changes above, in scheme C the aircraft facilities described as in variant A aka catapult on the 3rd turret and space for 2-3 aircrafts. The most notable difference between variants A and C is the usage of ten 5,25" twin DPAA turrets but it's not stated in what layout so I replaced the 6" turrets and the forward 4,7" guns on a 1-1 basis while on the stern and on the bridge sides where I put the extra Pom-Pom mounts but again Friedman is not clear regarding their number so it could be either 4,6 or 8 mounts.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
10x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes
3 Supermarine Walrus Floatplanes


Nelson Class 1937 Modernization Proposal
dhommas-13da69d7-1c58-4749-af38-902b1509dbc4.png


In 1937 November, DTSD (Director of Training and Staff Duties) started discussions on the possible Modernization of the two ships altough this large refit might be delayed until 1941 or even further. None the less the proposal included up to 5 5,25" twin turrets per side (I've chosen 4 as it is working well with the other changes) while DTSD thought the minimum acceptable Pom-Pom battery was 4, DNAD (Director of Naval Air Division) opted for 6. DNAD also wanted a KGV style cross-deck cataput and likely hanger facilities.
Controlled deferred the decision till the mid of July 1938 and I did not have more details on this proposal. So my drawing shows a Nelson with KGV style aircraft arrangement and Dual-Purpose battery layout and heightened funnel with cap.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes
2 Supermarine Walrus Floatplanes

Nelson Class 1938 June Modernization Scheme B
dhof5k2-1f0e033a-0cdf-489e-b4cd-cef5d9e57172.png


In mid 1938 DNC started proposing a number of plans to modernize the Nelson class Battleships. The earliest know version I could find was an 9 June proposal for an austere refit which embodied the replacement of the 6" twin turrets by 5,25" twin ones on a 1-1 basis, Pom-Pom armament inchesed to 4 mounts where the extra two were to be abeam the tower bridge. Aircraft facilities followed the 1936 July Schemes A and C but explicitly stated (sketch drawings shows) that 3 aircraft to be carried, one on top of the catapult and 2 near the crane with folded wings.
HACS number is debatable but the description suggests at least 3 directors two in place of the aft 6" DCTs while one or two atop the Mast. Friedman states this is Scheme B, I do not know Scheme A's changes. It is not know if the Machinery were to be replaced or not but desire for higher speed and the slightly later proposals included this aspect.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 70.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 47km/h (25,5knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
4x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
3 Supermarine Walrus Floatplanes

Sensors:
2x Type 79 Air-Search Radars

Nelson Class 1938 July Modernization Scheme A
dho86bl-b6994051-c340-47c8-98dd-214ebc036e3a.png


Not long after the previous proposal in July, was a New Scheme A was prepared, and which was the most radical modernization so far. It included the complete reconstruction of the tower bridge structure similar to that of the Queen Elizabeths, (I presume Warspite which was used as a prototype bridge for the KGV class) new hanger and 100ft cross deck catapult in place of the boat stowage. The changed bridge structure also meant the replacement of the forward mast with a light tripod or simple polemast.
As in the other rebuilt ships, replacing the existing machinery with modern ones would not only add more power but reduce size and weight as well. The expected increase was to 70.000shp, for a speed of 25.5knots at 36.000tons. Funnel too would had to be risen by 10ft or 3meters.
Armour wise not just the belt armour might be extended forward to improve trim of the ships but the internal belt was expected to be replaced by an external one. The thickness would not change but the inclination would be removed as the new external belt was to be a vertical one.
Armament wise the most notable change are the inclusion of the 5,25" QF Mk I guns in twin turrets 6 aft (3 per side) near the catapult and 2 forward just ahead of the first or A triple 16" turret and behind the forwardmost breakwater. This would not only provide 8 gun broadside of heavy AA firepower but also 4 direct ahead fire capability with the increased pro of a single director could control these two turrets. It is accepted that the first turret fire arc was to be restricted in and elevation of 9° and over 15° either side. This was considered acceptable because it corresponded to a range of 15.000 yards or 13.700meters. Alternatively these turrets could be depressed in the hull to reduce these firi9ng restrictions. While the forward 5.25" magazines were outside the citadel they deemed acceptable because they were now below the extended armoured deck.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 70.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 47km/h (25,5knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
3 Supermarine Walrus Floatplanes

Sensors:
2x Type 79 Air-Search Radars

Nelson Class 1938 July Modernization Scheme A1
dho36mt-bd48ef9f-f3b9-44a2-9dd8-c6576cdbe3b2.png


This drawing shows the alternative layout of the forward 5,25" turrets. In this case they are depressed in the hull by roughly one meter to provide less obstructions for the forwardmost 16" triple turret. Otherwise it is the same as the previous version.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 70.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 47km/h (25,5knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
3 Supermarine Walrus Floatplanes

Sensors:
2x Type 79 Air-Search Radars

Nelson Class 1938 July Modernization Scheme B
dhnwff4-3cb68865-107b-4230-a886-21e2ac35edfd.png


Scheme B offers a different layout for the the 5,25" twin turrets where the forwardmost ones placed abreast of the bridge to what I understand is the standard superfiring pair layout adopted for the KGVs, Lions and Vanguard. Other then this the design characterstics is the same as of Scheme A but I added the aircraft cranes of the KGV instead of relaying on the boat crane of the Nelson class, and the usage of a simple forward polemast.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 70.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 47km/h (25,5knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
3 Supermarine Walrus Floatplanes

Sensors:
2x Type 79 Air-Search Radars

Nelson Class 1938 September Modernization Scheme
dhnoa85-e1670ead-1703-4ed2-bf31-e7e3bc1baee1.png


This is formally ordered modernization scheme of the Nelson class battleships from 1938 September 1, asked by the Controller. Most of the changes of the previous variants were included like the upgrade of the engines, modifying the armour scheme, total bridge reconstruction with full hanger and cross-deck catapult, but six rather then eight 5,25twin turrets, 6 Pom-Poms, Torpedo tubes removal.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 70.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 47km/h (25,5knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
3 Supermarine Walrus Floatplanes

Sensors:
2x Type 79 Air-Search Radars

Nelson Class 1939 March Modernization Proposal
dhnf4t4-a6577722-5b45-443a-90d5-0980c4a43848.png


By March 1939 the 1938 September scheme was modified to reduce costs. The belt armour replacement remained (eg replace the internal one with an external one) , new machinery likely the 70.000shp proposal, High-Angle gun rearmament (unknown which proposal) I've chosen the simpliest version replacing the 6" twins by 5,25" one on one, instead of cross deck catapult and full hanger facilities a simple catapult on top arrangement was chosen with likely 3 aircrafts, New QE/Warspite or KGV/Lion style bridge, removal of the torpedo tubes.
A cost to cost breakdown was provided which as follows:

New belt (£650,000, 2 years)
New machinery (£700,000, 2½ to 3 years)
High-angle rearmament (£900,000, 2 years)
Aircraft arrangements (£180,000, to be done during rearmament)
New bridge (£100,000, 1½ years)
Removal of torpedo tubes (£10,000, during repairs) was considered desirable.
additional £460,000 to make good defects and for normal alterations and additions.

The total costs would be 3 million pounds per ship!

The proposed schedule for the two ships would be:
HMS Nelson to be taken in Davenport Naval Yard between 1940 and 42 December
HMS Rodney to be taken in Portsmouth Naval Yard between 1939 and 41 October or 1940 and 42 January
This schedule was set by the completion of HMS Renown, Valiant, King George V and Prince of Wales.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 35.000tons (standard)
Engines: 70.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 47km/h (25,5knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
3 Supermarine Walrus Floatplanes

Sensors:
2x Type 79 Air-Search Radars
 
Third Part: The era of War
In this last part I show the Nelson class preferably HMS Nelson as looked like in the War including the various AA refits but also the proposed mid war Modernization plans.

Nelson Class in 1940
dhn4k2k-c6da9474-bfd7-41e8-b0dd-0a9e14b88855.png


HMS Nelson received her emergency AA refit in the August of 1940 with the addition of an Octuple Pom-Pom mount and later by two others as well as four 20-barrel Unrotated Projectile AA rocket launchers and the installation of the Type 281 Air-Search radar set on both of her masts and the 4,7" guns got their splinter shields. This drawings shows her in late 1940 early 1941.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 33.313tons (standard), 43.300tons (full load)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
5x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns
4x20 UP AA Rocket launchers
2x1 622mm Underwater torpedo tubes

Sensors:
2x Type 279 Air-Search Radars

HMS Nelson in 1942
dhmydv9-34903699-6bea-4a19-83bf-991953dac414.png


The drawing represents HMS Nelson as looked like in 1942 after she got her mid war AA refit of an extra Pom-Pom atop the 2nd or B 16" turret, 20mm Oerlikon guns (13 in number) Surface search, AA director and Pom-Pom director radars as well as her own colour scheme. As the 20-barrel UP launchers deemed unsatisfactory in AA defence these weapon system got removed as well.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 33.313tons (standard), 43.300tons (full load)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
13x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns
2x4 12,7mm/62 MG Mk III AA Guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 279 Air-Search Radars
4x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
1x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radar
2x Type 285 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 April Short Term AA Refit Proposal
dhmotu5-65d1d52c-4fc6-4fea-af5a-b2e3a8fc778e.png


At the end of April 1943, DGD (Director of Gunnery Division) proposed a "Short Term" and "Ultimate" AA modernization proposal for the Class. This drawing represents the "Short Term" variant where DGD envisioned 4-6 twin 4" guns per side replacing the entire secondary and heavy AA battery. DTSD (Director of Training and Staff Duties) considered this to be a poor margin. I'm not sure why, because the AA firepower of the ship would be increased considerably by the sheer number of barrels per side. Light AA armament change was not stated so I put half the usual desired Oerlikon mounts so 25 barrels on the ship. Pom-Pom was unchanged compared to her 1942 state, only all of them received a radar equipped director. HACS Director number and layout was again unknown so I installed two more in place of the 6" DCT on top of the bridge bringing their number to four.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
12x2 4"/45 (102mm/45) QF Mk XVI Guns,
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
25x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
6x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars
4x Type 285 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 April Ultimate AA Refit Proposal
dhmipfp-dd67da91-ce2e-418d-a0d6-bffb21a6f81d.png


At the end of April 1943, DGD (Director of Gunnery Division) proposed a "Short Term" and "Ultimate" AA modernization proposal for the Class. This drawing represents the "Ultimate" variant where DGD envisioned 4 twin 5,25" guns per side replacing the entire secondary and heavy AA battery. The Ultimate close range AA armament would be 9 Octuple Pom-Poms, and 50-60 Oerlikon barrels. Sadly neither of the sisters could be released until Italy was defeated and the Regia Marina immobilized. HMS Rodney would have to be rewired and her electrical system overhauled because that had been deferred in 1939 and never carried out.
For the 60 Oerlikon barrels I've used a mix of 14 twin and 32 single mounts, the 9 Pom-Poms arranged so that the centreline stern mount was replaced by two side by side ones, and in place of the forwardmost 4,7" guns I've placed another pair. HACS wise I've used the same layout as on the "Short Term" version.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
9x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
14x2,32x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
9x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars
4x Type 285 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 July Modernization Variant A
dhmakrs-f357b276-b6a4-4907-9f08-cde3d40a7333.png


Representatives of DNC, DGD and DNO assembled on the 2nd of July 1943. Of the previous proposals, DGD’s ultimate 5.25in battery had been ruled out by weight considerations. DNC Offered 8 twin 4,5" mounts, 4 per side which should solve the weight issue but it is described that RPC (Remote Power Control) was needed hence I thought the mounting would be the Mark UD Mark III as I depicted on my drawing. Deck space would 10-12 Octuple Pom-Poms and the usual 50-60 Oerlikon Barrels. The chosen High-Angle Control System is the new Mark VI which was still under development and said would seriously delay the project. AA armament layout follows of DNC's Ultimate version just and added Pom-Pom atop the 3rd or X turret. Interestingly both ships were wanted by the end of 1944 June and while Nelson could be released for a refit of 6 months, Rodney required at least a year to remedy her state. Such short refit times meant neither the belt armour nor the machinery could be replaced.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 4,5"/45 (114mm/45) QF Mk I Guns,
12x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
14x2,32x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
12x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars
4x Type 285 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 July Modernization Variant B
dhm3a5h-7b4221e9-3576-40f6-ad54-e2142b80b36e.png


Variant B substitutes the previous proposal's 4,5" guns with 10x 4" twin ones, which is an alternative way for the weight issue, but there would still be considerable space issues between decks as in the 5.25" and 4.5" schemes.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
10x2 4"/45 (102mm/45) QF Mk XVI Guns,
12x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
14x2,32x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
12x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars
4x Type 285 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 July Modernization Variant C
dhlzfcg-14cb30ae-bbfa-4501-92f8-dcb6de5d9299.png


Variant C or Temporary measure offers a limited but quick and economical AA improvement plan for the Nelsons. It was described that two twin 4" guns would be installed on the ships on both sides. In place of the aft 6" twin turret as well as the 4,7" guns, two Mark VI HACS and additional Pom-Poms (10 mounts in total) and Oerlikons would be installed as well.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
4x2 4"/45 (102mm/45) QF Mk XVI Guns,
10x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
14x2,32x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
10x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars
2x Type 285 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 July DGD Variant 1A
dhln3r4-c01198ca-e704-41db-88ae-9d8705ce79ed.png


Now this proposal is a weird one. Norman Friedman's description is not clear about the AA armament and their layout of this version. He states that the two twin 5,25" mounts per side was DGD's personal preference but then the next section tells that the old 4,7" single guns either be left alone (producing a mixed AA battery layout) or be replaced by two twins each side. This drawing shows the first, mixed variant with Mark IV HACS and a reduced Oerlikon amount of 6 twin and 15 single mounts.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
4x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
8x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
6x2,15x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
8x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars
4x Type 285 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 July DGD Variant 1B
dhlh83e-99a5e9b9-093d-4c4c-b59b-bb24ee02907c.png


As stated in the previous drawing, this one shows the second, uniform 5,25" armed version, replacing the two forward pair of 6" turrets and the first and aft pair of 4,7" guns with a total of 8 twin 5,25" guns. It was described that this layout creates a desired four-cornered ship. Other aspects remained the same.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
6x2,15x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
8x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars
4x Type 285 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 July DGD Variant 2
dhl8naw-c32766ab-5fed-4acb-9e8c-c0f5747e59a7.png


In the 2nd proposal DGD offered 8 twin 5,25" turrets served by 4 Mark VI HACS with the new Type 275 radars in a Four-Corner arrangement. Light AA would be strengthened by 3 more Octuple Pom-Pom mounts for a total of 9. Additional Oerlikons was 24 in Nelson and 18 in Rodney, each case included 4 twin ones.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
9x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x2,51x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
8x Type 275 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
9x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 July DGD Variant 3
dhl1efz-c21b2758-5586-430d-aeb4-3d090154797e.png


The 3rd variant is essentially identical to the previous 2nd one but the 5,25" twin turrets got replaced by 4,5" ones. DNC was proposed this alteration because it had issues with the weight of 8 twin 5,25" turrets.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 4,5"/45 (114mm/45) QF Mk I Guns,
9x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x2,51x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
8x Type 275 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
9x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 July DGD Variant 4
dhkwzyd-1d2da236-b569-4716-9641-79043d0815b1.png


The 4th DGD proposal was again an economical sorta minimal AA refit proposal. Instead of replacing all the 6" and 4,7" with whatever AA gun was proposed, this time only the forward 4,7" ones to be replaced by 4" twins and the aft ones as well as the 3rd pair of 6" turrets might be replaced by Octuple Pom-Pom mounts. The text is not clear if the remaining 6" turrets to be retained or removed altogether. HACS wise I've chosen the Mark VI with Type 275 radars because at this time this was the desired AA control suite.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
4x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
4x2 4"/45 (102mm/45) QF Mk XVI Guns,
10x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
21x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
4x Type 275 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
10x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 DGD Optimum Battery Variant
dhkmqre-f9d2c2e6-9fa1-4670-bcd6-21a18629060e.png


Somewhat later in late Summer, early Autumn 1943 DGD (Director of Gunnery Division) offered an optimum battery refit, which included ten twin 4,5" guns in BD mounts to replace the existing 6" and 4,7" armament but could accept 4" gun if the BDs were not available in time. DGD also desired a four corner arrangement of the HA/LA directors (Not sure which HACS, Mark IV,V or VI) which suggests placing them on the where originally the 6" DCTs were located at. Close range AA would consist of 9 Quadruple or Octuple mountings and 50-60 Oerlikon barrels. HMS Rodney should also have the long-deferred additional deck armour forward which only installed on her sister Nelson. From this data I've made this drawing. The position of the aft HACS Mark VI's meant relocating the Pom-Poms of which I've put on the stern, while the extra mounts were placed in the previous location of the 4,7" AA guns. Oerlikon wise I've chosen a 1/3rd - 2/3rd mix of twin and single Oerlikons for a 50 barrels number.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
10x2 4,5"/45 (114mm/45) QF Mk I Guns,
9x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
12x2,26x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
8x Type 275 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
9x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 DNC Interim Battery Variant
dhkgxb2-6fc8b930-f02a-4709-9f07-58c85343c30c.png


Based on Friedman's description this 1943 July variant was the interim aka short term proposed AA battery modernization suite for the Nelson class by DNC (Director of Naval Construction). The description states the installment of 4 twin 4" guns on each side in place of the 6" twin turrets, the description is not clear about the Pom-Pom armament for this proposal so I chose a 9 mounting layout
and an Oerlikon armament of 2 twin and 27 single mounts. Other changes include the installment of the Mark IVGB or Mark VI HACS (I chose Mark IV for this variant) but with Type 285 radars, two in place of the 6" directors on top of the bridge and two more in place of the Pom-Poms next to the tripod mainmast thus relocating them. AS it is not clear I put the 2nd pair of Mark IV HACS close to the funnel.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 4"/45 (102mm/45) QF Mk XVI Guns,
9x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x2,29x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
8x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars
4x Type 285 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class 1943 DNC Ultimate Battery Variant
dhk7hju-73bf1782-cf9b-4b0c-8972-b4fa0a23c7b3.png


Based on Friedman's description this 1943 July variant was the Ultimate desired AA battery modernization suite for the Nelson class proposed by DNC (Director of Naval Construction). The description states the installment of 4 twin 5,25" turrets on each side in place of the 6" twin turrets, and an addition of a pair of Octuple Pom-Poms for a total of 8 and an expected Oerlikon armament of 2 twin and 48 single (Nelson) or 52 single mounts (Rodney). Other changes include the installment of the Mark IVGB or Mark VI HACS but with Type 285 radars, two in place of the 6" directors on top of the bridge and two more in place of the Pom-Poms next to the tripod mainmast thus relocating them.
I've relocated the said Pom-Poms on the stern while the extra two mounts were added next to the bridge in place of the forwardmost 4,7" AA guns. Oerlikons were added where place was available.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 5,25"/50 (133mm/50) QF Mk I Guns,
8x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
2x2,48x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
8x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radars
4x Type 285 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars

Nelson Class USN-BAD Modernization Proposal 1
dhjxj88-a041f403-2cb0-4539-b2cf-7f5dad1dbb98.png


In 1943 September BAD (British Admiralty Delegation) approached the USN with a design preparred by the DNC for modernizing the HMS Nelson in one of their yards.
They justified the project on the basis that the United Kingdom could only refit Rodney, but both ships were needed to fight in the Pacific. To overcome US reluctance to rebuild old ships, they emphasized that this time the modernization was of a relatively modern warship rather a WW1 one, whose armament was virtually unchanged since her completion and her scheduled 1939 modernization had been stopped by the breakout of hostilities.
The first proposal initially was a request to mount 5"/54 guns (3 per side and which guns were intended for the Montanas) but the British seems not known that such a guns were not (yet) manufactured. The 5" guns were to be controlled by four American Mark 37 directors but with British Type 275 radars (The same combo used on HMS Vanguard) in a square arrangement. (Two on supports on both sides of the bridge and two abaft the mainmast) Additionally there were to be two Auto Barrage Units for the 16" guns and the main gun director to be updated with Type 274 radars.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 5"/54 (127mm/54) Mark 16 Guns,
10x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x2,48x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 274 Gunnery Control Radars
8x Type 275 AA Gunnery Control Radars
2x Type 281 Air-Search Radars
10x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 283 Auto Barrage Fire Radars


Nelson Class USN-BAD Modernization Proposal 2A
dhjpn8g-23035b31-bb16-4092-8bd4-5c36696304d5.png


This is the second or alternative BAD (British Admiralty Delegation) proposal created by the DNC for the USN to consider modernizing HMS Nelson. It contains more serious changed compared to the description of the previous proposal:
4 twin 5"/38 gun turrets each side in place of the 6" twin turrets with a deckhouse constructed for them similar to that of the Tennessee class battleships, while Friedman states that all the Pom-Poms were to be replaced by US type quad Boforses, the wind tunnel model actually shows simplified Pom-Pom mounts so I made two versions of this proposal. Friedman also numbers 8 such mounts yet the model shows 10, so I stayed with that. Oerlikon armament number was not stated in the description and the model shows around 38 mounts (By the looks of it all single) but as the usual required number by this time was 50-60 barrels by the RN, I placed 26 single and 12 twin mounts on her. The same directors were to be used like on the 1st proposal just the arrangement of the Mark 37 ones altered to a diamond shape having two centreline ones: one atop the conning tower forward and one aft behind the aft main gunnery director, the other two was on the edges of the bridge tower on tubular towers. While Friedman states that the tower bridge to be replaced by that of similar to KGV or Valiant the wind tunnel model shows the original Nelson tower bridge with added deckhouse elements so I stayed with this. These added deckhouses are mostly around the base of the tower bridge: a tilted roofed 2 deck high structure, a sort of fly bridge and long platform above them reaching the Pom-Poms next to the funnel, heavily extended compass platform and a small deckhouse at the base of the forward main battery director. The photo is not clear enough for other details but there seems to be a Type 293 Air Search radar on the forward mast, and 1-2 maybe Type 277 surface search radars on Pylons on top of the HACS Platform and a likely Type 281B radar on top of the tripod mast.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 5"/38 (127mm/38) Mark 12 Guns,
10x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
12x2,26x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
2x Type 274 Gunnery Control Radars
8x Type 275 AA Gunnery Control Radars
2x Type 277 Surface-Search Radar
1x Type 281B Air-Search Radar
10x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
2x Type 283 Auto Barrage Fire Radars
1x Type 293 Air-Search Radar

Wind tunnel photo:
View: https://i.imgur.com/SGV9qIF.png


Nelson Class USN-BAD Modernization Proposal 2B
dhjkfbe-e5af659d-0924-4104-b6f7-e7e58fd6bf15.png


This drawing shows the in description version of the second proposal where all the Pom-Poms were replaced by Bofors guns, otherwise not different from the previous drawing.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
8x2 5"/38 (127mm/38) Mark 12 Guns,
10x4 40mm/56 Mark 2 AA Guns
12x2,26x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark II AA guns

Sensors:
2x Type 274 Gunnery Control Radars
8x Type 275 AA Gunnery Control Radars
2x Type 277 Surface-Search Radar
1x Type 281B Air-Search Radar
2x Type 283 Auto Barrage Fire Radars
1x Type 293 Air-Search Radar

Wind tunnel photo:
View: https://i.imgur.com/SGV9qIF.png


HMS Nelson in 1945
dhjcxbr-4b15fd86-5e44-4815-9a85-ce9dc815a74e.png


This is my final drawing of the Nelson class battleships and shows HMS Nelson as looked like at the end of WW2 in 1945 with the simplified colour scheme and full set of light AA guns received mostly after her US refit and includes 6 Octuple Pom-Poms, 4 quad Bofors guns and 61-65 single Oerlikons.

The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 201,2 (pp) x 214,4m (wl) x 216,4 (oa) 32.3 x 10,2 meters
Displacement: 36.000tons (standard), 43.140tons (full load)
Engines: 45.000shp Steam Turbines engines, 2 shafts
Speed: 43km/h (23knots)
Range: 10.200km (6.500nm)
Armour: 356mm Belt over Magazines, 330mm over Machinery inclined at 18°, 159mm Deck over Magazines, 95mm over Machinery, 108mm Slopes
Armaments:
3x3 16"/45 (406mm/45) BL Mark I Cannons,
6x2 6"/50 (152mm/50) BL Mk XXII Guns,
6x1 4,7"/40 (120mm/40) QF Mk VIII AA Guns
6x8 40mm/39 QF Mk VIII AA Guns
4x4 40mm/56 Mark 2 AA Guns
61x1 20mm/70 Oerlikon Mark III AA guns

Sensors:
1x Type 273 Surface-Search Radar
2x Type 279 Air-Search Radars
5x Type 282 Pom-Pom Director Radars
4x Type 283 Auto Barrage Fire Radars
1x Type 284 Gunnery Control Radar
2x Type 285 HACS AA Gunnery Control Radars


Important:
The Modernization plans information came mostly from Norman Friedman's British Battleships 1906-1946 and based on his descriptions. If and when I got access to more accurate and official documents their look and details will likely be updated but for the time being these are my most accurate depictions.
Extract of Friedman's descriptions:
 

Attachments

  • Nelson Modernizations.docx
    36.2 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom