Reply to thread

Once again they're worrying about the exact name of ship. That nonsense always accompanies bad analysis.


Beyond the nonsense, there are some worrying signs - basically they're taking the Flight III capability as a baseline. But the Flight III capability was a compromise to fit the DDG-51 hull. So are they taking the Flight III capability as a good starting point from analysis or are they just doing it because?


One last note, the program's speed is the biggest hint that DDG-51 Flight III isn't working.


Back
Top Bottom