Sukhoi Fighter & Ground Attack Aircraft Projects

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
26 May 2006
Messages
33,480
Reaction score
13,529
Also here is some unidentified Sukhoi Fighters of 1940;

http://alternathistory.org.ua/istrebiteli-posukhogo-perioda-vtoroi-mirovoi-voiny
 

Attachments

  • Sukhoi fighter 1.jpg
    Sukhoi fighter 1.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 1,204
  • Sukhoi fighter 8.jpg
    Sukhoi fighter 8.jpg
    33.2 KB · Views: 277
  • Sukhoi fighter 7.jpg
    Sukhoi fighter 7.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 280
  • Sukhoi fighter 6.jpg
    Sukhoi fighter 6.jpg
    32.6 KB · Views: 280
  • Sukhoi fighter 5.jpg
    Sukhoi fighter 5.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 1,103
  • Sukhoi fighter 4.gif
    Sukhoi fighter 4.gif
    70.3 KB · Views: 1,158
  • Sukhoi fighter 3.jpg
    Sukhoi fighter 3.jpg
    24.9 KB · Views: 1,152
  • Sukhoi fighter 2.jpg
    Sukhoi fighter 2.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 1,225
And;
 

Attachments

  • Sukhoi fighter 9.jpg
    Sukhoi fighter 9.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 373
My 5 kopecks to this topic
SINGLE-SEAT FIGHTER POWERED BY TWO M-107 ENGINES
 

Attachments

  • Resize of Su I 2M-107.jpg
    Resize of Su I 2M-107.jpg
    680.2 KB · Views: 493
picture 2: single-seat fighter s2 AM-37

picture 4: IOP 2 AM-37 ,variant1: low wing ; variant 2: middle wing design

picture 6: general view of the aircraft I2M-92

picture 7: may be my imagination, but I think i see the TK3 designation in the end

picture 8: general view of the .......TK3

picture 9: general view of the single seat fighter with two M-107 motors
 
bigvlada said:
picture 2: single-seat fighter s2 AM-37

picture 4: IOP 2 AM-37 ,variant1: low wing ; variant 2: middle wing design

picture 6: general view of the aircraft I2M-92

picture 7: may be my imagination, but I think i see the TK3 designation in the end

picture 8: general view of the .......TK3

picture 9: general view of the single seat fighter with two M-107 motors

Good job ! Soviet unknown projects are very intersting, particulary these of Mr Sukhoi !
Regards
 
bigvlada said:
picture 2: single-seat fighter s2 AM-37

picture 4: IOP 2 AM-37 ,variant1: low wing ; variant 2: middle wing design

picture 6: general view of the aircraft I2M-92

picture 7: may be my imagination, but I think i see the TK3 designation in the end

picture 8: general view of the .......TK3

picture 9: general view of the single seat fighter with two M-107 motors


Excellent,thank you Bigvlada very much.
 
borovik said:
My 5 kopecks to this topic
SINGLE-SEAT FIGHTER POWERED BY TWO M-107 ENGINES

Any estimated performance figures? What was the armament (almost looks like two ShKAS...)

Thanks!
 
The calculated data are not known.
To arm has different information,
V. Proklov's (director of the museum Sukhoi Design Bureau) in the "Planes of the world" № 2, 2001 wrote: "Armament consisted of three 23-mm cannons. A was placed (in the sleeve)in the bush of propeller, the other two - in the wing." Probably 'VYa'
According to Gordon /OKB Sukhoi A history of the design bureauand its aircraft/ the following information: "Gun armament of the fighter consisted of two wing - mounted 12.7 mm (.50 cal) UBS machine guns and single 20 mm cannon."
 

Attachments

  • Resize of _Su I M-2x107.JPG
    Resize of _Su I M-2x107.JPG
    81.5 KB · Views: 224
Also from Kryl'ya Rodine 5/1996,


a more drawings to a Sukhoi Fighter Projects and the schedule to the plans from 1940
up to 1943.
 

Attachments

  • 1940-1943.png
    1940-1943.png
    286.1 KB · Views: 243
  • Su-6.png
    Su-6.png
    377.5 KB · Views: 245
  • B.png
    B.png
    359.6 KB · Views: 231
  • SU.png
    SU.png
    458.4 KB · Views: 240
1) - ODBSh or aircraft"91"(intrafactory code)/6.1941/ - twin engined (M-71F) armored attack aircraft, no fighter
2) - DDBSh or aircraft "B" or Su-8 /10.1941/- twin engined armored attacker, no fighter
3) - I-2xM-71F with 4 TK-3 superchargers fighter/multipurpose aircraft /12.1942/(see also post 1, picture 7 and 8) no Su-6 !!!
In the text magazine literally says: ...with a modified cabin by type Su-6.
 
Wonderful!!
The ancient times of the airplane of a Sukhoi are also still very beautiful.
 
Hi
Thanks is there a designation associated with No 5, the westland whirlwind lookalike.
Or a date associatec with the proposal ?
Cheers
Jerry
 
Hi Brewerjerry,


the No.5 was called IOP with 2 AM-38 engines,all its data is here;
http://alternathistory.org.ua/istrebiteli-posukhogo-perioda-vtoroi-mirovoi-voiny
 
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • I-M71_001.jpg
    I-M71_001.jpg
    122.7 KB · Views: 857
  • I-M71_002.jpg
    I-M71_002.jpg
    112.8 KB · Views: 836
  • Su I-2M107_001.jpg
    Su I-2M107_001.jpg
    71.9 KB · Views: 836
  • Su I-2M107_002.jpg
    Su I-2M107_002.jpg
    97.3 KB · Views: 849
Thank you for wonderful pictures.
These are sharp pictures which looks just like the photograph of an actual airplane. :eek:
 
hesham said:
Hi Brewerjerry,


the No.5 was called IOP with 2 AM-38 engines,all its data is here;
http://alternathistory.org.ua/istrebiteli-posukhogo-perioda-vtoroi-mirovoi-voiny

hi
Many thanks
Jerry
 
Damn! That Su I 2M-107 is a fine looking bird! That'd make a great kit! And excellent work on the illustrations!
 
About splendid graphics / CGI by Marek Rys - as well as those Sukhoi's high altitude fighter with M-90 engine and two TK-1 superchargers ...
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,17243.0/all.html
 
hesham said:
Also from Kryl'ya Rodine 5/1996,

a more drawings to a Sukhoi Fighter Projects and the schedule to the plans from 1940
up to 1943.


The Aircraft "B" from Krylya Rodine 5/2006 in details.
 

Attachments

  • B.png
    B.png
    308.8 KB · Views: 714
Also from Krylya Rodine 6/2006,


here is a new variant (for me) to Sukhoi DDBSh aircraft powered with 2 M71 engines,and
it appeared in two versions.
 

Attachments

  • 1-1.png
    1-1.png
    216.5 KB · Views: 222
  • 1-2.png
    1-2.png
    141.4 KB · Views: 212
  • 1-3.png
    1-3.png
    141 KB · Views: 188
  • 2-1.png
    2-1.png
    231.6 KB · Views: 200
  • 2-2.png
    2-2.png
    172 KB · Views: 188
  • 2-3.png
    2-3.png
    155.8 KB · Views: 185
The drawing for this one, SINGLE-SEAT FIGHTER POWERED BY TWO M-107 ENGINES, looks to be dated 1944. Is it a continuation of a 1940 design? IMHO, it looks more like a late WWII design than an early WWII design.
 
That's right, this project is dated February 1944
 

Attachments

  • Clip.jpg
    Clip.jpg
    84.5 KB · Views: 155
From Авиация и Космонавтика 8/2010.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    106 KB · Views: 228
  • 2.png
    2.png
    127.6 KB · Views: 229
  • 3.png
    3.png
    111.3 KB · Views: 212
  • 4.png
    4.png
    107.5 KB · Views: 182
  • 5.png
    5.png
    250.6 KB · Views: 191
  • 6.png
    6.png
    238.7 KB · Views: 197
Hi!

"In late November 1942 the design year were single twin-engine fighter very original schema. Two air-cooled engine m-92 (design takeoff power 2200 HP) were located in the fuselage and through the ad hoc transfer of result in rotating screws located on the wing. By the end of 1942, all work on the project ceased."

http://www.k2x2.info/transport_i_aviacija/aviacija_i_kosmonavtika_2010_08/p6.php

You can see engine cooling air intake located at the wing leading edge and engine cooling air outlet located at the fuselage.
Also you can see single seat cockpit, extended propeller drive shaft and twin vertical tail stabilizer.
I can't find front view and side view of this design.
 

Attachments

  • 35-1.jpg
    35-1.jpg
    182.6 KB · Views: 156
http://alternathistory.com/istrebiteli-posukhogo-perioda-vtoroi-mirovoi-voiny

"Turbochargers were located inside the fuselage, on both sides of the engine. Exhaust gases from m-120 donors to TC, and the ones used in feed for vodoradiatorom. Provided for the extraction of gases in the vodoradiatora Canal, bypassing the TC. In addition, the exhaust pipes were shrouds, which blow in through vents in the frontal part of the wing with air purge outlet channel for vodoradiatorom. The flow of exhaust gases and blow air into the channel for water radiator or improve gas-air mixture and help create an additional reactive thrust."(Ejector?)

This radiator arragement looks like Bv p.208.03.
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=26136.0;attach=558382;image
 

Attachments

  • Layout scheme and m-120 (reconstruction).jpg
    Layout scheme and m-120 (reconstruction).jpg
    30.3 KB · Views: 158
blackkite said:
http://alternathistory.com/istrebiteli-posukhogo-perioda-vtoroi-mirovoi-voiny

This radiator arragement looks like Bv p.208.03.
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=26136.0;attach=558382;image

Pehaps. But it is also identical to the arrangement on the Sukhoi Su-1, which looks like this aircraft in many respects. The radiator arrangement is also conceptually similar to the arrangement used on the Il-2, although in the latter case air is taken in on top of the fuselage.
 
iverson said:
Pehaps. But it is also identical to the arrangement on the Sukhoi Su-1, which looks like this aircraft in many respects. The radiator arrangement is also conceptually similar to the arrangement used on the Il-2, although in the latter case air is taken in on top of the fuselage.
Thanks a lot. Very interesting layout. It's the first time for me to see such a design.

http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/72705-ilyushin-il-2-sturmovik/
 

Attachments

  • Il2.jpg
    Il2.jpg
    75.2 KB · Views: 425
  • 01.jpg
    01.jpg
    97.7 KB · Views: 412
Hi!
Su-8.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-8.

http://aviadejavu.ru/Site/Crafts/Craft20797.htm

DDBSh(or Su-8?) means twin-engine two-seat armored ground attack aircraft

SSTEAAA means single seat twin engine armored ground attack aircraft?

Twin engine fighter ⇒SSTEAAA ⇒DDBSh?
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=17597.0;attach=572037;image
 

Attachments

  • Layout scheme SSTEAAA.jpg
    Layout scheme SSTEAAA.jpg
    167 KB · Views: 158
  • General view DDBSh (option 4-seater bomber).jpg
    General view DDBSh (option 4-seater bomber).jpg
    187.8 KB · Views: 145
  • General view DDBSh (option 3-seater bomber).jpg
    General view DDBSh (option 3-seater bomber).jpg
    239.4 KB · Views: 142
  • General view of 2AM DDBSh-42.jpg
    General view of 2AM DDBSh-42.jpg
    212.7 KB · Views: 138
  • General view DDBSh m-71F.jpg
    General view DDBSh m-71F.jpg
    230.3 KB · Views: 130
  • Layout scheme DDBSh (option 4-seater Scout).jpg
    Layout scheme DDBSh (option 4-seater Scout).jpg
    65.2 KB · Views: 204
  • Layout scheme DDBSh (option 4-seater bomber).jpg
    Layout scheme DDBSh (option 4-seater bomber).jpg
    70.7 KB · Views: 205
  • Layout scheme DDBSh (option 3-seater Scout).jpg
    Layout scheme DDBSh (option 3-seater Scout).jpg
    63.2 KB · Views: 326
  • Layout scheme DDBSh (option 3-seater bomber).jpg
    Layout scheme DDBSh (option 3-seater bomber).jpg
    62.8 KB · Views: 340
  • sukhoi-su-8-ddbsh.png
    sukhoi-su-8-ddbsh.png
    27.7 KB · Views: 358
Hi!
http://alternathistory.com/ddbsh-su-8-samyi-luchshii-shturmovik-i-ego-bratya-sssr

"Chief Designer in the development of the fighter returned to nosovomu placing a block of Cannon and machine-gun armament. At the same time am-37 engines were replaced with more powerful am-38 with TK-3 turbochargers to improve characteristics of power plants."

These fighters were predecessors of Su-8?
 

Attachments

  • Fighter with AM-37 engine.jpg
    Fighter with AM-37 engine.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 212
  • 34-1.jpg
    34-1.jpg
    69.5 KB · Views: 206
  • Fighter with AM-38 engine + turbo charger.jpg
    Fighter with AM-38 engine + turbo charger.jpg
    101.4 KB · Views: 224
My dear Blackkite,

I sent all of those drawing before,why repeat displaying them in a seperated
topic,reply # 23;

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,17597.15.html
 
Yes I know my dear hesham-san. I add some explanation of each pictures. :)

Topics merged
 
blackkite said:
These fighters were predecessors of Su-8?
Indirectly, we can say only one (of three) versions of the project "I. O. P." with the engine AM-37. He alone had internal bomb load, the rest was designed as a "clean" fighters.
... and offtopic... back to the three previous reply - you can also recall a couple of projects with a similar arrangement of the radiator
 

Attachments

  • Su planes.jpg
    Su planes.jpg
    40.1 KB · Views: 142
  • Clip.jpg
    Clip.jpg
    930.2 KB · Views: 184
  • IS-TsAGI , BB-MAI.jpg
    IS-TsAGI , BB-MAI.jpg
    433.4 KB · Views: 172
Many thanks borovik-san. Perfect chart as usual. :eek:
Bottom drawing is very interesting.
Borovik-san, have you ever seen three side view drawing of this unique fighter?
 

Attachments

  • 040611_istrebiteli-posukhogo_20.jpg
    040611_istrebiteli-posukhogo_20.jpg
    48.6 KB · Views: 141
No, have not seen, I can confidently say that if these schemes are preserved, but neither V. Proklov nor anyone else in the press did not publish them. (tried to find its own reconstruction , side view, but he's probably on another computer)
 
borovik said:
No, have not seen, I can confidently say that if these schemes are preserved, but neither V. Proklov nor anyone else in the press did not publish them. (tried to find its own reconstruction , side view, but he's probably on another computer)
Many thanks borovik-san. Preserved!! :D
I hope we watch these schemes near future.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom