Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Take for example cargo shipping lanes.Most traffic follow the same pathes, sailing the same routes. Many of them burn low grade heavy oil as some countries haven't banned them to prop their local industry (France is one of them, believe it or not).If now we begin by having Beaming sattelites focused on providing constant exposure around those lanes, shipping emissions would be reduced gradually until the point were oil consumption will be minimal. That process is scalable and could probably be quickly self funded (Beaming services will bill kW just like electricity companies do today).The only problem in that is de-risking the technology. Public funding is there for that purpose when a direct improvement of citizens life can be expected.Sadly, Europe industry just show (again) how altered their permissive critical thinking as gone warry with idiots constructing gigantic projects around something that they don't master to hide their case and source easy money (the complexity being just a business case to hide a certain failure). It reminds me those genial inventors that used public funds to build planes with 4, 6 or 8 wings when biplane were invented, 10, 12 engines when twin long range airplane surfaced and gazillon boosters/stages rockets when 2 and 3 staged rockets began to be successful...
Take for example cargo shipping lanes.
Most traffic follow the same pathes, sailing the same routes. Many of them burn low grade heavy oil as some countries haven't banned them to prop their local industry (France is one of them, believe it or not).
If now we begin by having Beaming sattelites focused on providing constant exposure around those lanes, shipping emissions would be reduced gradually until the point were oil consumption will be minimal. That process is scalable and could probably be quickly self funded (Beaming services will bill kW just like electricity companies do today).
The only problem in that is de-risking the technology. Public funding is there for that purpose when a direct improvement of citizens life can be expected.
Sadly, Europe industry just show (again) how altered their permissive critical thinking as gone warry with idiots constructing gigantic projects around something that they don't master to hide their case and source easy money (the complexity being just a business case to hide a certain failure). It reminds me those genial inventors that used public funds to build planes with 4, 6 or 8 wings when biplane were invented, 10, 12 engines when twin long range airplane surfaced and gazillon boosters/stages rockets when 2 and 3 staged rockets began to be successful...
