That does sound like a 1.42 test article. When the 1.44 was revealed one of my first thoughts was that it resembled HiMAT, they've noticed the same thing here. Possibly a test article used to evaluate a given aerodynamic layout, seems like the vertical tails were a bit further outboard then they ended up on the 1.44.
... the plot thickens. Would not account for the twin tails supposedly spotted, but could explain the Sukhoi connection reported in the Western press. And perhaps the rather baffling appearance on that chart, as the Su-47 was not yet called by that name at the time
The original article describes the SIB-A wings as 'delta/swept' not having forward sweep however it does say the outer wings were obscured.
Also the description of the canards and their location seems more consistent with 1.42 layout than either S-32 or S-37. It could have been a generic test model by SIBNIA patterned after HIMAT.
Didn't necessarily mean a flying demonstrator, although the above document seems to leave that possibility open. But it was located at a facility adjacent to NAPO - where NOVO-C was identified. Just an interesting thought.
Consider too, in the late '70s when what was to become known as the Sukhoi Su-27, was spotted, it was thought to be a VG aircraft and initial artist concepts showed it as such.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.