Reply to thread

Many thanks hesham ... details added from both sources.


The 4-seater and metal construction projects are very intriguing indeed. No real evidence, of course, but they may well be our 'missing' RA 18 and RA 19 designations!


About the RA 16, was it being a projected RA 14 derivative also your supposition? Makes sense but I've fudged and listed it as "(RA 14/RA 15 derivative?)". However, if you have a source, that can be easily corrected.


Back
Top Bottom