There is nothing in front of the engine so I don’t think it really matterSeems to me that the sharper cone takes up smaller space. Not sure if that had anything to do with the design.
Now it sound like old jet engines have blunt nose and newer one have pointy noseSpinner shape is largely a question of OEM preference I think - it does have a bearing on things like FOD rejection round the core and (especially in airliners) ice accumulation, but you can execute a successful design either way. Which is also why you see manufacturers sometimes switching between styles (basic AL-31F is blunt but 117S is pointed, or F101 and F404, as eagle mentions). It's definitely not a Russian vs. US thing.
GE4 (SST) and J58 both had blunt.Now it sound like old jet engines have blunt nose and newer one have pointy noseSpinner shape is largely a question of OEM preference I think - it does have a bearing on things like FOD rejection round the core and (especially in airliners) ice accumulation, but you can execute a successful design either way. Which is also why you see manufacturers sometimes switching between styles (basic AL-31F is blunt but 117S is pointed, or F101 and F404, as eagle mentions). It's definitely not a Russian vs. US thing.
Now it sound like old jet engines have blunt nose and newer one have pointy nose
In aircraft with RCS consideration, isnt the view to the engine cone is blocked by inlet duct already?Now it sound like old jet engines have blunt nose and newer one have pointy nose
For military engines that may well be the case, possibly due to RCS considerations, as Paul suggests.