Who could determine from that credit at the end of each article that these were my drawings? As previously discussed on here, had you had the common courtesy of asking permission to use the drawings, you'd be able to credit them properly (at each drawing, as is the traditional manner) you'd have been provided with hi-res much better images, including the CGI images I have of Ben etc in action.
I think anyone on this forum, and fellow researchers, will attest to my generosity with drawings, but I do expect a certain level of recognition.
Credit them as I have requested and I can, as I have said in the past, provide better drawings rather than wobbly scans. All I ask is to be given credit for my (copyrighted) drawings and while you're at it, other people's material on there. I think you'll agree that's a small price to pay (i.e. nothing) for better artwork and at the end of the day, good artwork makes or breaks any author's work in this field.
Chris
PS One place I worked, I was known as the Funky Gibbon (older readers will understand that reference) usually Tannoyed as 'Funky the Mud Man', so that name error doesn't bother me one bit. Actually, I quite like that. I might just use that as my handle from now on.
