Clioman said:The AAHS article (Vol. 23, No. 1, p. 18-22) is a reminiscence by aircraft engineer Dusty Carter, who began his career in 1936 as an apprentice at Vultee. The article ("Vultee 'P-38'") has two drawings that may be of interest, but nothing about Vultee project nomenclature. In passing, however, it does mention that Curtiss also submitted a design for the competition leading to the USAAC's P-38 program.
lark said:Maybe this is usefull.
....Preliminary designs were identified by a sequential number , prefixed by
a letter denoting the type.For example XP 1015 (Experimental Interceptor Pursuit)
and XC 1031 (Experimental Commercial)...
ref: Vultee chapter in General Dynamics and their Predecessors-Putnam.
P.S. I think the above mentioned designs never received a Vultee model number.
'35' seems a bit to low for the twinengined pursuit design competing for
what became the the P-38...
Maybe this is usefull.
....Preliminary designs were identified by a sequential number , prefixed by
a letter denoting the type.For example XP 1015 (Experimental Interceptor Pursuit)
and XC 1031 (Experimental Commercial)...
ref: Vultee chapter in General Dynamics and their Predecessors-Putnam.
P.S. I think the above mentioned designs never received a Vultee model number.
'35' seems a bit to low for the twinengined pursuit design competing for
what became the the P-38...
What type of radial engine would have powered the XC1031?
Vultee XC1031 : Two-place side by side light aircaft.
Engine choise : 90 hp. Lambert.
source : AAHS journal Spring 1988, page 22.
Likely a Lambert M-5(?)Vultee XC1031 : Two-place side by side light aircaft.
Engine choise : 90 hp. Lambert.
source : AAHS journal Spring 1988, page 22.