That would result in a "tilt wing" while in VTOL, rather than a "quad copter." This setup would seem to create a much more controllable and stable VTOL platform.Using a grumman wing fold like that is neat, but I wonder if it'd be lighter/easier to have a variable incidence wing with a simple hinge at the first nacelle.
I mentioned this in the eVTOL thread. They're using props which collapse against the nacelle when not under load. A big benefit is that the aircraft can cruise in horizontal flight on just two motors, with the other two stopped and their props contributing little drag.Anyone know why they are using the "floppy" propellers?
Came across this video of the early R/C model development of the design - actually pretty cool!
Easier packaging? Thought the same thing too.... MarkAnyone know why they are using the "floppy" propellers?
Lots of small drones out there.Please notice how light is the model. The demo doesn't prove anything regarding scalability. Hence, give to this video as much credence as the famous flying lawnmower...
Why would only one get stuck?I wonder if this is now a single point of failure design from a safety perspective. If one of the wings gets stuck in transformation can you still safely land?
The New Atlas article mentions a hypothetical 10-seat TransWing fitting in the same footprint as the 5-seat Joby or 7-seat Lilium aircraft.I wonder how well this concept could scale up.
But the author does not indicate whether that's an estimate from Ptero or his own prognostication.
I wonder how well this concept could scale up.
two could get stuck too, but if one is already enough to make it unsafe then you dont even need to check the secondWhy would only one get stuck?I wonder if this is now a single point of failure design from a safety perspective. If one of the wings gets stuck in transformation can you still safely land?