Post war British Military Transports

aeronut

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
10 November 2007
Messages
8
Reaction score
5
I have in my collection details of these four Military transport aircraft projects and will welcome comments.
The Airspeed AS 60 Ayrshire development of the Ambasador
The Blackburn B107 Beverley Development (a new fuselage and four RR Tynes mated to the Beverley wing).
The Handley Page Herald variant that lost out to the Andover.
The GAL design for a Medium Glider that was to replace the Horsa.
 

Attachments

  • New Medium Glider 2.jpg
    New Medium Glider 2.jpg
    34.1 KB · Views: 1,094
  • B107 Artists Impression.jpg
    B107 Artists Impression.jpg
    81.8 KB · Views: 1,149
  • Ayrshire GA.jpg
    Ayrshire GA.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 1,120
  • Herald GA.jpg
    Herald GA.jpg
    55.4 KB · Views: 1,096
Nice pictures.

Am I correct in thinking that the GAL glider evolved into the Blackburn Beverly? There's some nice info on the B.107 in Roy Boot's 'Spitfire to Eurofighter'.

The military Herald actually saw service with the Royal Malaysian Air Force. Sadly the Herald itself was not a big seller, dooming Handley Page... :(
 
Interesting drawings Aeronut.
Can you tell us what your source is?
 
Apart from the Glider all are from original Manufacturers brochures, the sort of thing the companies would have presented to their Airships who'd issued the specification.
The Airspeed one is the only one I parted cash for, the others were being thrown out at work (On that day my car was officially a skip ;) ) along with nearly three hundred Airborne Forces experimental Establishment reports from WW2.
The New Medium Glider was contained in a Catelogue of Airborne Forces Equipments published by the AATDC
 
".. the others were being thrown out at work ..."

That's something, most of us are dreaming of ! :eek:

Here's a Herald derivative, that should have been a development in cooperation
with Breguet, designated HPR-8 during a presentation of possible future car ferries
by Silver City in 1963:

(from The Aeroplane 2/1960)
 

Attachments

  • HP-Breguet-HPR8-Ferry.jpg
    HP-Breguet-HPR8-Ferry.jpg
    60.5 KB · Views: 976
Nice images and an area over looked in the Secret Project books so far.

Any more drawings of the Blackburn B.107 as that looks rather similar to an AN22 Cock although probably somewhat smaller.

There should be posts on the AW681 and DH129 airlifters from the 1960's if you search the forum.

Geoff
 
Drawing of the upper aircraft is the Fairchild C-82 I guess...

Both planes are illustrated in the patent drawing for comparision purpose I think..
 
Great video dear Grey Havoc!

Was Blackburn Beverly the only airplane with those net-style paratrooper restraints (seat-belts)?

While Beverly retained the belly hatch for dropping paratroopers, Bristol had the good sense to make it long enough to reduce the risk of banging your head on the rear edge (aka. “ringing the bell”).

The aft fuselage of the GAF New Medium Glider and Bristol Beverly looks like it was copied from the WW2-vintage Arado 232 “thousand footer.”
 
Last edited:
[...]
Was Bristol Beverly the only airplane with those net-style paratrooper restraints (seat-belts)?
While Beverly retained the belly hatch for dropping paratroopers, Bristol had the good sense
[...]
Err... Blackburn!
 
Corrected.


Paratroopers being a rowdy bunch really do need to be restrained.

Master Corporal Rob Warner, CD, BA and a couple sets of paratrooper wings.
I survived when a Beechcraft King Air Force-landed when with a bunch of skydivers on board, but a shortage of seat-belts. Since then, I have become a seat-belt Nazi!
 
Last edited:
Airspeed AS.60 Ayrshire C.1
Proposed variant to meet Air Ministry Specification C.13/45 for a medium-range military transport. Ten were ordered in October 1946 but were not built, after a review of the design's projected performance produced figures lower than the Air Ministry's requirements.
 

Attachments

  • Airspeed AS.60 Ayrshire C.1.jpg
    Airspeed AS.60 Ayrshire C.1.jpg
    161.2 KB · Views: 172
  • Ayrshire GA.jpg
    Ayrshire GA.jpg
    78.2 KB · Views: 168
The AS.60 was then developed into the AS.67, which had a redesigned fuselage, accessed through clamshell doors and a large side door, but kept the Ambassador's wings, tail and empennage. This design was not produced as the Fairchild C-119 was chosen instead, which were to be supplied under MDAP, however, these were never delivered due to the outbreak of the Korean War. The first three images below were posted courtesy of Hesham and the latter one by Jemiba here: https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/airspeed-aircraft-projects.3327/
 

Attachments

  • Airspeed AS.60 and AS.67.png
    Airspeed AS.60 and AS.67.png
    40.7 KB · Views: 161
  • Airspeed AS.67.jpg
    Airspeed AS.67.jpg
    38.1 KB · Views: 155
  • Airspeed AS.67 picture 2.jpg
    Airspeed AS.67 picture 2.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 161
  • Airspeed AS.67 3-view.jpg
    Airspeed AS.67 3-view.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 200

Attachments

  • airspeed-ambassador-as67-freighter_360_12c3faaadc10706625cd9fd5207544d2.jpg
    airspeed-ambassador-as67-freighter_360_12c3faaadc10706625cd9fd5207544d2.jpg
    119.8 KB · Views: 164
  • airspeed-ambassador-as67-freighter_360_12c3faaadc10706625cd9fd5207544d2Q.jpg
    airspeed-ambassador-as67-freighter_360_12c3faaadc10706625cd9fd5207544d2Q.jpg
    87 KB · Views: 170
Hi,
was this patent for early Blackburn Beverley aircraft concept (the upper one) ?.

One of several patents applied for by Brumby and Blackburn Aircraft in 1952, all relating to aspects of the Beverley. I agree with lark that the upper drawing is most probably the Fairchild C-82 but I would not expect them to have included it simply for comparison. To me it suggests that Blackburn and Fairchild may have signed a production licence agreement. The application for a US patent (from UK patent GB727159) may support this, but the possibility isn't mentioned in Chris' excellent On Atlas' Shoulders though.
 
#8 & 9: C-82 similarity is, I suggest, conceptual. By the date of the Application, 5/53, C-119 was the product for which UK made an MSP bid. Any Sister Firm work and/or licence by Blackburn would have been on that. But I doubt any such thought entered the mind of Blackburn's Board. They had bought General despite, and not because of (to be) Beverley.

36 of the 42 Blackburn B.2 trainers had been operated to 1942 by the contractor for No.4 E(R)FTS/Brough...Blackburn A/C Ltd, who also owned (wef 1938) the contractor for No.5 E(R)FTS/Hanworth, the London Flying Syndicate, who in 1944 bought the freehold of Feltham Air Park/Hanworth Aerodrome, thus becoming landlord of General A/C. Hanworth was blighted for flying as Heathrow grew; General ran out of work when assault gliders succumbed to Pioneers and choppers. Blackburn did not buy them 1/1/49 for the son-of-Hamilcar scheme that became Beverley, but to close down the activity that was diminishing the value of the site....which Blackburn sold well to the Local Authority in 1956.

Blackburn has a treasured place in anybody's list of the World's Worst A/c and faced dereliction 3/51 when Y.B.1/B-88 lost to Fairey Gannet. (How odd that they diversified into aftermarket support of the Jowett Javelin car!) 30 BPA Balliols, then Vampire wings and 20 Beverlies kept them alive, increased to 47 after they schemed best for (to be) Buccaneer. RAF would have been entirely happy to support brown jobs with the same C-119G as many others, and were embarrassed to take delivery of blunderbuses after others had C-130A/B.
 
#23 NBR. I have little to say (!?!) beyond buy CJG's On Atlas Shoulders and enjoy pages 199-201.

When HS681 was chopped 2/2/65 BAC/Filton rushed a slim volume to try to resurrect their BAC.222 that had lost to it. The DoD bid for (to be) C-130K was fixed price, late delivery penalty, 10 years' credit. British industry could spell none of those words, so no-one took the fiction as fact, least of all RR, horrified at the notion of building wet Speys to match McDonnell's F-4K/M production rate, so unenthusiastic to try to match Lockheed-Georgia's production rate at the same time...and trying to put Spey on (to be) F-111K.
 
Last edited:
#8 & 9: C-82 similarity is, I suggest, conceptual. etc
Conceptual, yes, as are all illustrations in patents. Curious, nonetheless, that they should chose a design so easily recognisable as the C-82, the fins are so distinctive.

Despite the 3:1 ratio of capitalisation the joining of the two companies was a merger/amalgamation with many consequent changes at board level and a great deal of friction. Sure, the GAL60 may not have been looked upon with enthusiasm by the Brough boys but given the woeful state of their project work at the time the aircraft did hold out the prospect of sales. Neither Brough nor Dunbarton turned a profit after the merger and despite the sale of GAL's Hanworth properties the joint company was close to being on its knees within two years and narrowly avoided liquidation. The sale of 47 Beverleys was useful, to say the least.
 
The AS.60 was then developed into the AS.67, which had a redesigned fuselage, accessed through clamshell doors and a large side door, but kept the Ambassador's wings, tail and empennage. This design was not produced as the Fairchild C-119 was chosen instead, which were to be supplied under MDAP, however, these were never delivered due to the outbreak of the Korean War. The first three images below were posted courtesy of Hesham and the latter one by Jemiba here: https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/airspeed-aircraft-projects.3327/
Here is a picture of the AS.60 I've found in my files (I suppose it comes from the "Flight" magazine of 17 April 1947).
Note the wide ramp.
 

Attachments

  • Airspeed AS-60 rear ramp.JPG
    Airspeed AS-60 rear ramp.JPG
    191.2 KB · Views: 109

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom