Post-1906 Battleships with Large Calibre Secondary Batteries

World B4

my bad y'all
Joined
25 June 2017
Messages
392
Reaction score
313
Battleships/battlecruisers with secondary guns 7" or larger
on this page is shown soviet postwar projects for pocket battleships with 180mm and 220 mm secondary guns
I recall a proposal for a Brazilian battleship with 16" and 9.4" guns
Plus, I've heard about the larger H class superbattleshipsbeing planned to have 9.4" secondaries
 
Aye, that crazy one and i happen to read "Aidan Dodson's The Windfall Battleships" a couple weeks ago, but i wouldn't know these projects without reading Stefphano's blog either.
Plus, I've heard about the larger H class superbattleshipsbeing planned to have 9.4" secondaries
Ah yes the infamous and mythical H-45, which happen to be on @drwells42 website.
 
Battleships/battlecruisers with secondary guns 7" or larger
on this page is shown soviet postwar projects for pocket battleships with 180mm and 220 mm secondary guns
I recall a proposal for a Brazilian battleship with 16" and 9.4" guns
Plus, I've heard about the larger H class superbattleshipsbeing planned to have 9.4" secondaries
I would not call the Project 45 battleships as pocket battleships. More like Battleship killers or hunters, certanly not in league with the Deutschlands, D class and other proposals.
 
I'm confused by the rationale of the proposed Brazilian ship's secondary armament. With a broadside of only 4 240mm guns they are probably going to have a lower aggregate firing rate than the 406mm rifles, and that, combined with their lower hitting power seems to indicate they wouldn't contribute much to any "hail of fire". Is there any record of the reasoning behind this?
 
I'm confused by the rationale of the proposed Brazilian ship's secondary armament. With a broadside of only 4 240mm guns they are probably going to have a lower aggregate firing rate than the 406mm rifles, and that, combined with their lower hitting power seems to indicate they wouldn't contribute much to any "hail of fire". Is there any record of the reasoning behind this?
My secondary's bigger than your (Argentina's) secondary is entirely possible.
 
Well when that battleship designed in 1912 most navies had 12" cannons but transition begun to 13,5-14" cannons. It is likely expected that such large calibre at that time would mean slow firing rate say close to 1 shell per minute hence the necessary larger secondary guns which could fire faster but still has a decent penetration ability.
 
There are likely two factors into Bacellar decisions for arming 234mm guns on No.686, the battle ranges which he expect to be relatively close to medium ranges and the average armor thickness of Chile and Argentinian battleships (Rivadavia have shallow main belt, upper belt can be defeated by Armstrong proposed 234mm, assuming the battle would fall under 10km of course).
 
Last edited:
Battleships/battlecruisers with secondary guns 7" or larger
What I can remember on the topic (besides what've been already talked about in the thread):

Ansaldo Design UP41 for USSR carried 180mm/57 B-1-P guns in four triple turrets as secondaries.
1728232691621.png

Japanese "Super-Yamato" in its ultimate form allegedly was to be armed with 203mm secondaries.
1728233066484.png

Also from Italy, there were General Edgardo Ferrati's designs from 1915, some of which carried 170mm secondary guns in twin turrets. The main question is, what these guns would be, as no guns of such caliber ever existed in Italy.
1728233326719.png

Junkers' diesel battleship designed in 1912 carried 19cm/45 secondary guns in casemates (although again, no guns of this caliber were ever used by German Navy).
1728233680207.png

Plus, I've heard about the larger H class superbattleshipsbeing planned to have 9.4" secondaries
Never heard of this.
 
Junkers' diesel battleship designed in 1912 carried 19cm/45 secondary guns in casemates (although again, no guns of this caliber were ever used by German Navy).
Here's his 24500t variant which have 21cm secondaries from bunderachiv.
 

Attachments

  • junkers24500t.jpg
    junkers24500t.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 65
  • junkers24500t2.jpg
    junkers24500t2.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 60
  • junkers24500t3.jpg
    junkers24500t3.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 79
I'm confused by the rationale of the proposed Brazilian ship's secondary armament. With a broadside of only 4 240mm guns they are probably going to have a lower aggregate firing rate than the 406mm rifles, and that, combined with their lower hitting power seems to indicate they wouldn't contribute much to any "hail of fire". Is there any record of the reasoning behind this?
The main battery of 406mm/45cs of the Brazilian superdreadnought design "Rio de Janeiro" would have faced the 2 (or 3*) argentine battleships "Rivadavia" under construction, but the function of the 239mm/50cs as a secondary battery was to discourage and face the 4 armored cruisers (Garibaldi, Belgrano, San Martín and Pueyrredón) and the 4 protected cruisers (Patagonia, Veinticinco de Mayo, Nueve de Julio and Buenos Aires) of Argentina.
The Argentine armored cruisers "Garibaldi/San Martín" had 6 254mm/40cs guns and 4 203mm/40cs guns that could support their fleet of battleships between 11 and 13 kilometers. This is a type of ship that Brazil did not have in existence or in plans and for which Bacellar thought of the technological solution of a large secondary battery that would act in addition to the tertiary battery of 152mm/50cs.
Among the Argentine protected cruisers there were 2 210mm/35cs guns, 2 203mm/45cs guns and several 152mm/45cs and 152mm/40cs guns, but these were not ships that threatened the integrity of a battleship such as the one presented here.

*The third one tied its existence to this very Brazilian battleship (later ordered as "653", reordered as "690A" and finally sold).
 
Plus, I've heard about the larger H class superbattleshipsbeing planned to have 9.4" secondaries




Never heard of this.

If you've never heard of it, you must be doing something right. It is from the well-known "hoax" battleship H-45, which never even got onto the drawing board, at least not in the World War II era. Curiously enough, I suspect that the original creator of the design may have been trying to demonstrate the absurdity of such a ship. Sadly, the internet has convinced some people that the design was real.

DRW
 
Battleships/battlecruisers with secondary guns 7" or larger
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/soviet-naval-gun-projects.38420/page-2 on this page is shown soviet postwar projects for pocket battleships with 180mm and 220 mm secondary guns
Well, the Soviet "small battleships" - or as Tzoli defined them quite accurately, "battleship killers" - have very limited number of heavy guns (from 2 to 5, depending on project), and were not supposed to carry DP guns (it was assumed, that they would always operate with DP guns equipped destroyers and cruisers to provide long-range air defense). So they needed some "intermediate" guns to ward off enemy destroyers and light cruisers. Therefore the idea of putting 180-mm - 220-mm battery on them, to dealt with enemies that would be too hard to hit with main guns.
 
If you've never heard of it, you must be doing something right. It is from the well-known "hoax" battleship H-45, which never even got onto the drawing board, at least not in the World War II era. Curiously enough, I suspect that the original creator of the design may have been trying to demonstrate the absurdity of such a ship. Sadly, the internet has convinced some people that the design was real.
My b, I thought it was considered for the H-42/43/44, not just fake lore for the meme ship
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom