Piaggio P.16

Nico

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
9 September 2008
Messages
274
Reaction score
101
Hi my friends,
in anotther thread Theponja asked for a three-view drawing of the P.16 (the Piaggio one, not to be confused with the Pilatus P.16). Unfortunately, I lack any sort of drawing related to the P.16 but I have some interesting pictures and information about it.
The origin of the P.16 is a little mistery: the few sources about it state that it was a proposal answering the Regia Aeronautica requirement that originated the SIAI-Marchetti S.81 Pipistrello but in a press release (that I was unable to find) Piaggio stated: "...but Regia Aeronautica preferred the S.79...". In fact, in early thirties any aeronautical engineer submitted all ideas he had and the various manufacturers hoped to build everything they had on the paper or in prototype form...
Another, more intriguing, aspect of the mistery is that ing. (eng.) Giovanni Pegna, technical director of Piaggio, was completely unfamiliar with metal airframes and designed exclusively wooden aircraft. Then, who was the designer of the P.16? Perhaps the author of the P.16 project was a young ing. Giuseppe Gabrielli (of FIAT fame), that since August 29, 1927, was assistant technical director of the Piaggio design bureau in Finale Ligure Marina (Savona), about 70 km West of Genoa. Another possibility was ing. Giuseppe Foà (later Joseph Victor Foa) but he was too young and joined the Pegna team in 1935, in Reggio Emilia, when Pegna already departed from Piaggio.
The only prototype of P.16 was ordered on July 4, 1933 (but Italian contracts usually are finalized after the building was already started, or finished, following a letter of intent and sometime after an informal mail or even verbal order...) and was officially flown in February 1935 (the first official test flight in presence of Regia Aeronautica officers, but the aircraft had alredy made its first flight, at Villanova d'Albenga Airport, about 25 km from the experimental department of the factory, in November 1934, with Mario Gamna at the controls).
P.16 is described in Piaggio literature as the first Piaggio aircraft of entirely metallic construction and with variable pitch propellers designed by ing. Corradino D'Ascanio. In fact, the aircraft was of mixed construction and the reare part of the belly was fabric-covered. The official literature quotes "a tail powered turret (the only case in the Italian aviation history)" but as you can see in the picture I enclose, the defensive position had an hand-held machine-gun (another was in a dorsal position and other two in wing roots).
We have also a picture of a wind-tunnel model of a seaplane torpedo bomber version of P.16, probably a not-buil concurrent of SIAI-Marchetti S.55.
Technical data of this strategic bomber, with a crew of five, were the following (from various sources):
Power plant: three Piaggio P.IX RC Stella II, 9-cylinder single-row, radial engines rated at 610/700 CV (P.IX was a developed version of the Gnome-et-Rhône GR.9K Mistral), with two-blade variable pitch metal propellers.
Span: 22.00 m
Length: 13.40 m
Height: 4.90 m
Wing area: 70.0 sq.m
Empty weight: 5,600 kg
Loaded weight: 8,450 kg
Max speed: 400 kmh at 5,000 m
Cruise speed: 324 kmh
Climb: to 6,000 in 17 min
Service ceiling: 5,800 m
Combat radius: 560 km
Range: 1,496 km (2,000 km with 500-kg bombload)
Armament: four 7.7-mm Lewis Mk.1 machine-gun and 1,000 kg bombload
 

Attachments

  • Piaggio P.16_(MM.226)_224.jpg
    Piaggio P.16_(MM.226)_224.jpg
    119.9 KB · Views: 1,120
  • Piaggio_P.16_(front)_242.jpg
    Piaggio_P.16_(front)_242.jpg
    83.3 KB · Views: 980
  • Piaggio_P.16_(rear)_232.jpg
    Piaggio_P.16_(rear)_232.jpg
    133.8 KB · Views: 946
  • Piaggio_P.16_191.jpg
    Piaggio_P.16_191.jpg
    85.5 KB · Views: 895
  • Piaggio_P.16_225.jpg
    Piaggio_P.16_225.jpg
    546.7 KB · Views: 904
...and there is the pic of the wind-tunnel model of the torpedo-bomber seaplane derivative (apparently without a specific name, even if some source speaks of P.16T)
Nico
 

Attachments

  • Piaggio_P.16Idro_289.jpg
    Piaggio_P.16Idro_289.jpg
    381.7 KB · Views: 381
What a horribly uncomfortable and ineffective looking tailgunner position. He can't see or shoot much of anything above the horizontal plane.
 
Indeed! ;D

The official literature quotes "a tail powered turret (the only case in the Italian aviation history)" but as you can see in the picture I enclose, the defensive position had an hand-held machine-gun (another was in a dorsal position and other two in wing roots).

Perhaps the powered turret wasn't ready in time and the prototype ended up built and flown without it, a conventional installation being fitted instead. The mention of a "tail powered turret" is interesting nevertheless. Does this means that a remote controlled barbette or something like that was originally envisioned for this machine?
 
Probably we rather have to think of something like the manned Vickers turrets for the
Wellington Mk.I, not a remotely controlled system. Nevertheless, AFAIK for Italian bombers
of that era, manually operated guns and turrets, sometimes fitted with aerodynamic balance,
were standard. So manned power operated weapons would have been a step ahead.
 
Thanks Jemiba, what you said makes sense - and made me think of other, contemporary power operated weapon installations of British (the enclosed nose turret on the Boulton Paul Overstrand, which was power-operated - a first in a RAF bomber, I suppose - springs to mind) and Soviet design.
 
Nico thanks a lot for all the information and the pics. The lack of information about the designer is a problem because sometimes you can extrapolate details from others designs to complete a model or a 3d view.

The seaplane is fascinating. That pic is "gold".

Thanks again
Luis
 
Hi all,
a bit lately, I found this beautiful drawing of the late Giorgio Bignozzi
Nico
 

Attachments

  • Piaggio P.16_349.jpg
    Piaggio P.16_349.jpg
    126 KB · Views: 469
Thanks Nico, I really missed such P-16 three views.
I start thinking about a mine drawing about it exploiting this very beautiful Bignozzi's one... ;)
 
Excellent stuff, Nico. What are your sources?
 
Hi Arjen,
I have clippings from tons of aeronautical magazines of last 40 years (and some even older...).
Nico
 
Hi,

why you feel that,this drawing differs a little to Piaggio P.16 ?;

http://oldmachinepress.com/2015/11/29/piaggio-p-16-bomber/
 

Attachments

  • piaggio-p16-1932.jpg
    piaggio-p16-1932.jpg
    83.2 KB · Views: 251
Unique wingshape was not used says text with the drawing..
 
Hi! Russian site.
http://www.airwar.ru/enc/bww2/p16.html
p. 16
Wing span, m 18.20
Length, m 15.60
Height, m 4.90
Mass, kg
Empty aircraft 6200
maximum takeoff 9500
Maximum speed, km/h 386
Cruising speed, km/h 324
Crew, PRs 5
Armament: six 7.7 mm machine guns SAFAT
bomb load-up to 1800 kg
http://deruluft.livejournal.com/30938.html

List of Russian site. ;)
https://forum.warthunder.ru/index.php?/topic/48211-%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%91%D1%82%D1%8B-%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B8/
 

Attachments

  • Static tests on the Piaggio 'P. 16' monoplane, at the Piaggio airplane factory in Finale Ligure..jpg
    Static tests on the Piaggio 'P. 16' monoplane, at the Piaggio airplane factory in Finale Ligure..jpg
    194.3 KB · Views: 190
  • p16-1.gif
    p16-1.gif
    209.4 KB · Views: 397
  • piaggio p16.jpg
    piaggio p16.jpg
    36.2 KB · Views: 369
  • 0_7e620_ea5d84a8_XL.jpg
    0_7e620_ea5d84a8_XL.jpg
    41 KB · Views: 356
  • p16-6.jpg
    p16-6.jpg
    49.4 KB · Views: 362
  • p16-7.jpg
    p16-7.jpg
    55.3 KB · Views: 372
Hi! Front view of same drawing.
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=12311.0;attach=552305;image

Source
http://cirulliarchive.org/artwork/disegno-progettuale-per-aeroplano-p-16-produzione-piaggio-c/
 

Attachments

  • Front view.jpg
    Front view.jpg
    86 KB · Views: 158
Hi,

here is a Piaggio P.16C civil version Project of 1933,mentioned in D'Ascanio files,
I don't know if he involved in development or not ?.

http://www.archivi.beniculturali.it/dga/uploads/documents/PIA/5225af74721dc.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 183  Piaggio P.16C.png
    183 Piaggio P.16C.png
    120.5 KB · Views: 149
  • 183.png
    183.png
    20.4 KB · Views: 145

Attachments

  • 24.jpg
    24.jpg
    32.5 KB · Views: 102
What an interesting design, connecting the wing roots to the top of the plane's fuselage like that. Was there a specific reason they chose to do that?
 

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom