I was reading about the XB-35 and it mentioned that the wing used two different marks(R-4360-17 and R-4360-21) of Wasp Major engines so me, being me, had to find out why. Along the way I discovered this awesome paper discussing the development of the ultimate expression of airborne piston engines. It came from here with this copyright notice on the main page. Enjoy.
BTW, the answer I was looking for: The inboard engines had longer output shafts necessitating a different sub type.
Edit: changed -21 from -19
3. The Piston Engine Revolution
Although these papers, from the conference of the same name, are published in book form, the conference organisers decided that they should be made available without let or hinderance. If you do decide to make use of the papers, please acknowledge the time and money that was spent by the conference organisers, Bryan Lawton, Ed Marshall, John Anning and Fred Starr in setting up the conference and getting the conference volume published.
BTW, the answer I was looking for: The inboard engines had longer output shafts necessitating a different sub type.
Edit: changed -21 from -19
Attachments
Last edited: