Pioneer said:I always wondered how they proposed to incorporate the wing-folding of the XC-142 for carrier operations - what with the interconnectability of all four engines!
Pioneer said:Its more compact than I would ever thought possible - although with such vibration and rigidness of the wing required - I can not but help wonder if this fing-fold may have been a potential fatigue problem in operational aircraft!
Arjen said:
Thanks mark
Great find 'again'!
I always wondered how they proposed to incorporate the wing-folding of the XC-142 for carrier operations - what with the interconnectability of all four engines!
Its more compact than I would ever thought possible - although with such vibration and rigidness of the wing required - I can not but help wonder if this fing-fold may have been a potential fatigue problem in operational aircraft!
Thanks again!!
Regards
Pioneer
Revisiting this topic - alas ten years later....
Question if I may...did the prototype XC-142's have this wing-folding arrangement/mechanism incorporated? Or was it to be incorporated later, after prototyping test and evaluations had been completed?
Regards
Pioneer
Revisiting this topic - alas ten years later....
Question if I may...did the prototype XC-142's have this wing-folding arrangement/mechanism incorporated? Or was it to be incorporated later, after prototyping test and evaluations had been completed?
Regards
Pioneer
Pioneer I can find on evidence that this feature was incorporated or planned for incorporation in the XC-142 prototypes.