NPOMash 3M22 Tsirkon Hypersonic Missile

PAC-3 MSE is a particularly maneuverable point defense system, though that is all it would be against something hypersonic. The fact is Ukraine does not a meaningful number of radars and launchers for that target type. More over even older types like Kh-22 have sufficient speed that to the best of my knowledge, they have never been intercepted.
 
Does the rear booster separate? That forward extension is presumably for underwater launch?
 
Been seeing your concept art and it looks pretty legit. So if true is this similar to our hyfly? Also I am adding this picture I saw someone posted on your forum that I think could add some weight to your speculations.

05-12058113-26ccd566ef49-1.jpg

I could not find the origins of this image but I thought it would help in what you were trying to show with the four intakes.
 
Last edited:
Another one "Tsirkon" launch. This time in Mediterrian sea:

View: https://youtu.be/DiG3ZS50RSM


View: https://youtu.be/eMBocYJX4vw

View: https://youtu.be/wqMY2PjmhGc

 

Attachments

  • 1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.34.884.png
    1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.34.884.png
    1 MB · Views: 36
  • 1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.34.962.png
    1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.34.962.png
    1 MB · Views: 37
  • 1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.35.044.png
    1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.35.044.png
    1 MB · Views: 39
  • 1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.35.117.png
    1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.35.117.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 41
  • 1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.35.163.png
    1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.35.163.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 53
  • 1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.35.199.png
    1733234724831079_8rsSTsox.mp4_snapshot_00.35.199.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 73
Last edited:
Do we know anything more about it’s propulsion after its use in Ukraine?
 
a4be9f48-44ef-4535-b1ff-d6d19fe77ff0
 
Are we sure about those mid body wings on the upper section? There is nothing resembling those in the launch video above. there are some folded fins at the bottom of the upper section. Those are maybe even fairly long fins, longer than the fins in the graphic above. but they still look like a single set of fins placed near the bottom quarter of the missile (upper stage) length.
 
That's what the Boeing X-51 HCM demonstrator looked like when it flew in ~2010 - 2013.
Since then when someone mentions "Scramjet" missile, the X-51 pops into everybody's mind.
Most people don't realize there are many different scramjet intake designs.
I'm pretty sure the Russians copied one of a joint US/AUS Scramjet designs for Tsirkon.
HACM, from what I've read and seen has a very fluid-like flowing conical inlet, like nothing we've seen on any other missile...
 
That's what the Boeing X-51 HCM demonstrator looked like when it flew in ~2010 - 2013.
Since then when someone mentions "Scramjet" missile, the X-51 pops into everybody's mind.
Most people don't realize there are many different scramjet intake designs.
I'm pretty sure the Russians copied one of a joint US/AUS Scramjet designs for Tsirkon.
HACM, from what I've read and seen has a very fluid-like flowing conical inlet, like nothing we've seen on any other missile...
US HACM mock up
IMG_7481.png
IMG_7503.jpeg
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom