Doesn't change fact that you did not provide any evidence for assertion that you have made about there supposedly being Su-7 along supposed higher quality images.
Now you're asking us to spend money to see if you are right or wrong about your assertion about aircraft allegedly being an Su-7.
2013:
[ATTACH=full]697035[/ATTACH]
UAV powered by jet engine.
April 2015:
[ATTACH=full]697034[/ATTACH]
North Korea is producing Cessna-172 clone.
North Korea is producing aircrafts domestically.
No one is going to believe you nor should they take your word for it at all on supposed Su-7 is at airbase in present day according to you.
You provide no evidence to support the claim.
April 2017:
[MEDIA=youtube]oJs_PLAo9DM[/MEDIA]
Perceived industry capabilities.
[MEDIA=youtube]D1ItgJxwTHM[/MEDIA]
Difference between North Korea in mid 2017 by now in mid 2023 is basically night and day when they have long range cruise missiles.
How did supposed "Su-7" reach it when you assert roads are at "severe disrepair" while also arguing its not possible to transport aircraft from factory to airbase.
Never said that, you just did so in this thread.
Yet both unknown UAV and what you assert as being "Su-7" are there at the air base despite "severe disrepair" of the roads as you assert.
Because you don't know the difference between European and American trucks, former can maneuver far more than latter.
Especially when road corners are sharp.
