Wow!!
I for one have to hand it to the Chinese!
The decision to not just adopt, but to reinvigorate the An-12 'Cub' / Y-8 design is the equivalent of Lockheed modernizing the ambiguous C-130H to the C-130J configuration! After all, as is the case with the venerable C-130, there is nothing wrong with the basic design and concept of both the An-12/C-130!
If anyone doubts the logic of this adoption of the An-12/Y-8 design for Maritime Patrol / ASW, then one only need to look at what Lockheed Martin has studied and proposed recently SC-130J Sea Hercules - an adaption and role not too different to that of this Y-8ASW variant! The difference being that the PRC has it flying, whilst the C-130 Sea Hercules is a paper project!!
I find it interesting that the PRC have deemed it worthwhile to incorporate internal weapons bays into the design (and probably just as likely weapons hardpoints under the wings), just as Lockheed Martin has deemed warranted.
Not every air force/navy needs such an expensive and complicated MP/ASW aircraft as the Boeing P-8 Poseidon aircraft! Perhaps this is something many Western air forces/navy's should seriously take note of??
The good points I personally see in this Y-8ASW is as follows:
1/ The adoption and modification of a proven design (as has been the proven case with IL-18/IL-38 and L-188/P-3 Orion
2/ Cost effective (both purchase and operational costs)
3/ STOL & rough-field capability - critically important considering the PRC's/PLA's appreciation of the United States warfighting strategy of targeting airfields in day one of any military ops!
4/ Ease of avionics and sensor upgrades due to the transport design layout and configuration throughout the life of the design.
Regards
Pioneer