NASA Engineers Propose Combining a Rail Gun and a Scramjet to Fire Spacecraft

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
14 August 2009
Messages
9,704
Reaction score
2,780
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
From the journal of superscience, take with the appropriate grain of salt:

"NASA Engineers Propose Combining a Rail Gun and a Scramjet to Fire Spacecraft Into Orbit"
By Rena Marie Pacella Posted December 17, 2010

Source:
http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-11/nasa-engineers-propose-combining-rail-gun-and-scramjet-fire-spacecraft-orbit

n April, President Obama urged NASA to come up with, among other things, a less expensive method than conventional rocketry for launching spacecraft. By September, the agency's engineers floated a plan that would save millions of dollars in propellant, improve astronaut safety, and allow for more frequent flights. All it will take is two miles of train track, an airplane that can fly at 10 times the speed of sound, and a jolt of electricity big enough to light a small town.

The system calls for a two-mile- long rail gun that will launch a scramjet, which will then fly to 200,000 feet. The scramjet will then fire a payload into orbit and return to Earth. The process is more complex than a rocket launch, but engineers say it's also more flexible. With it, NASA could orbit a 10,000-pound satellite one day and send a manned ship toward the moon the next, on a fraction of the propellant used by today's rockets.

It may sound too awesome to ever be a reality. But unlike other rocket-less plans for space entry, each relevant technology is advanced enough that tests could take place in 10 years, says Stan Starr, a physicist at NASA's Kennedy Space Center. NASA's scramjets have hit Mach 10 for 12 seconds; last spring, Boeing's X-51 scramjet did Mach 5 for a record 200 seconds. Rail guns are coming along too. The Navy is testing an electromagnetic launch system to replace the hydraulics that catapult fighter jets from aircraft carriers. "We have all the ingredients," says Paul Bartolotta, a NASA aerospace engineer working on the project. "Now we just have to figure out how to bake the cake."

How To Fly Into Orbit:

Rev Up The Rail Gun

A 240,000-horsepower linear motor converts 180 megawatts into an electromagnetic force that propels a scramjet carrying a spacecraft down a two-mile-long track. The craft accelerates from 0 to 1,100 mph (Mach 1.5) in under 60 seconds— fast, but at less than 3 Gs, safe for manned flight.

Fire The Scramjet

The pilot fires a high-speed turbojet and launches from the track. Once the craft hits Mach 4, the air flowing through the jet intake is fast enough that it compresses, heats to 3,000ºF, and ignites hydrogen in the combustion chamber, producing tens of thousands of pounds of thrust.

Get Into Orbit

At an altitude of 200,000 feet, there isn't enough air for the scramjet, now traveling at Mach 10, to generate thrust. Here spaceflight begins. The two craft separate, and the scramjet pitches downward to get out of the way as the upper spacecraft fires tail rockets that shoot it into orbit.

Stick The Landing

The scramjet slows and uses its turbojets to fly back to Earth for a runway landing. Once the spacecraft delivers its payload into orbit, it reenters the atmosphere and glides back to the launch site. The two craft can be ready for another mission within 24 hours of landing.
 

Attachments

  • PSC1210HL029.jpg
    PSC1210HL029.jpg
    29.9 KB · Views: 353
Maybe it just seem to be less impressive, if they would have spoken just of an electro-magnetic
catapult, instead of a railgun. ::)
 
Add a touch of PLUTO and you have, Prelude To Space.

prelude-to-space.jpg
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/254286875/Launch-to-Space-With-an-Electromagnetic-Railgun

https://www.scribd.com/doc/254286827/Electromagnetic-launch-for-Space-Vehicles

https://www.scribd.com/doc/254286775/Electromagnetic-Augmentation
 
I got the chance to work briefly on NASA's Foster Miller track in 2003, when it was moved to KSC, to test the carriage that ran down the rail. The coils would accelerate the cradle down the first part of the track and then a set of coils on the second half would slow the cradle to a stop. The scalable concept during the test was to look at using a Super-Loki rocket, which was cost-effective and available, as the launch vehicle and the MagLev system as the first stage accelerator. The idea at the time was to develop a cost effective small payloads program to LEO. Other concepts I heard was to use it on the moon to shoot containers of samples back to Earth. The problem with the cradle on Earth was that it would 'bobble' and make contact with the track, slowing it down and keeping it from reaching any desirable speed.
 
I got the chance to work briefly on NASA's Foster Miller track in 2003, when it was moved to KSC, to test the carriage that ran down the rail. The coils would accelerate the cradle down the first part of the track and then a set of coils on the second half would slow the cradle to a stop. The scalable concept during the test was to look at using a Super-Loki rocket, which was cost-effective and available, as the launch vehicle and the MagLev system as the first stage accelerator. The idea at the time was to develop a cost effective small payloads program to LEO. Other concepts I heard was to use it on the moon to shoot containers of samples back to Earth. The problem with the cradle on Earth was that it would 'bobble' and make contact with the track, slowing it down and keeping it from reaching any desirable speed.
This is where you'd want to talk to the Chinese about their high speed maglev, how they kept the cars from contacting the rails.

If I'm remembering the fun correctly, you'd want a natural or artificially-made mountain at the east end of your maglev launcher, and ideally a lot more than 2 miles long so you could have lower acceleration levels.
 
If I'm remembering the fun correctly, you'd want a natural or artificially-made mountain at the east end of your maglev launcher, and ideally a lot more than 2 miles
This looks interesting:

I think the tallest naturally occurring slope can be found in the Andes, which plunge into the Pacific.

I might want to combine a coil gun with the tech above—and bore as long a tunnel as geography allows.

This company can bore into the hardest rock:

Have the low end beneath the ocean evacuated into a vacuum—release and that gets a slug moving and generates power moving up and sliding down which allows the maglev coils higher up to accelerate payloads.
 
Last edited:
I was taking a look at the Longshot gun-launch system --and their having to use burst disks.

The gun used staged gas discharges--and can't find valves that open fast enough.

Then I remembered the Gedanken experiment...talk about superluminal scissors.

Had anyone thought about scissor valves--since the intersection can move as fast as it likes (within reason)?
 
I was taking a look at the Longshot gun-launch system --and their having to use burst disks.

The gun used staged gas discharges--and can't find valves that open fast enough.

Then I remembered the Gedanken experiment...talk about superluminal scissors.

Had anyone thought about scissor valves--since the intersection can move as fast as it likes (within reason)?
 
I was taking a look at the Longshot gun-launch system --and their having to use burst disks.

The gun used staged gas discharges--and can't find valves that open fast enough.

Then I remembered the Gedanken experiment...talk about superluminal scissors.

Had anyone thought about scissor valves--since the intersection can move as fast as it likes (within reason)?
I remember seeing a thing about tank gun testing, shooting targets like captured tanks. The whole thing was done up in a bubble enclosure where they had dual valve/doors on the muzzle end of the setup. One was super fast closing, but wasn't quite airtight, while the other was airtight and was as fast as they could make it. The two doors were spaced some distance apart so that the super fast closing was at the wall of the enclosure, while the airtight door was at the muzzle end next to the tank. The spacing bought time for the airtight door to close completely while limiting just how much DU dust went into the firing tunnel.

Tank: airlock door: firing tunnel: superfast door: target enclosure

Would have been a Popular Mechanics news brief in the early 1990s.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom