In early 1960, Orenda Engines, a division of Avro Canada, began to develop a gas turbine to meet a U.S. Navy Bureau of Ships specification for the development of engines for a new type of minesweeper. The Canadian company and two American companies, including Ford Motor, received development contracts in July 1961. With financial support from the Canada government, what was by then the Orenda division of Hawker Siddeley Canada developed the OT-4 turbine.
Even before the summer of 1963 was over, the Orenda division found itself alone in the race. Better yet, the U.S. Army was considering the possibility of funding the development of a version of the OT-4 for use in main battle tanks. The U.S. Navy, meanwhile, was considering several applications, from minesweepers to landing craft, including amphibious vehicles. It was also interested in hovercrafts and hydrofoils. The two departments would now work together on an ambitious and well-coordinated project, the Army-Navy 600 HP Gas Turbine Development Program.
The years 1966-67 were a turning point in the history of the OT-4. A coastal minesweeper re-equipped with two OT-4s, the U.S.S. Bittern, carried out fairly successful sea trials. The Orenda division and an American diesel engine manufacturer initiated research to reduce the fuel consumption of the OT-4. Feasibility studies carried out by the two companies also examined the chances of success of the Canadian gas turbine in the field of road transport.
The Ontario-based company and a respected American heavy truck manufacturer, Autocar, were also beginning to cooperate. In 1967, the subsidiary of White Motor conducted road tests on Canadian soil with a heavy truck powered by an OT-4. That same year, two M48 Patton main battle tanks were apparently tested to verify the OT-4's effectiveness in very hot and very cold weather.
All of these efforts ended in September 1967. The U. S. Army came to the conclusion that OT-4 did not produce the power that future main battle tanks needed. The U.S. Navy, meanwhile, decided to use helicopters for its mine clearance missions, thus reducing the number of minesweepers it kept on duty. It could no longer justify additional expenses related to other applications that interested it.
Even before the summer of 1963 was over, the Orenda division found itself alone in the race. Better yet, the U.S. Army was considering the possibility of funding the development of a version of the OT-4 for use in main battle tanks. The U.S. Navy, meanwhile, was considering several applications, from minesweepers to landing craft, including amphibious vehicles. It was also interested in hovercrafts and hydrofoils. The two departments would now work together on an ambitious and well-coordinated project, the Army-Navy 600 HP Gas Turbine Development Program.
The years 1966-67 were a turning point in the history of the OT-4. A coastal minesweeper re-equipped with two OT-4s, the U.S.S. Bittern, carried out fairly successful sea trials. The Orenda division and an American diesel engine manufacturer initiated research to reduce the fuel consumption of the OT-4. Feasibility studies carried out by the two companies also examined the chances of success of the Canadian gas turbine in the field of road transport.
The Ontario-based company and a respected American heavy truck manufacturer, Autocar, were also beginning to cooperate. In 1967, the subsidiary of White Motor conducted road tests on Canadian soil with a heavy truck powered by an OT-4. That same year, two M48 Patton main battle tanks were apparently tested to verify the OT-4's effectiveness in very hot and very cold weather.
All of these efforts ended in September 1967. The U. S. Army came to the conclusion that OT-4 did not produce the power that future main battle tanks needed. The U.S. Navy, meanwhile, decided to use helicopters for its mine clearance missions, thus reducing the number of minesweepers it kept on duty. It could no longer justify additional expenses related to other applications that interested it.
Last edited: