MiG I-320

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
31 May 2007
Messages
8,571
Reaction score
6,753
Hi! MiG I-320.
(1) MiG I-320 was a all weather interceptor with radar requested in January 1948.
(2) MiG OKB built two prototypes R-1 and R-2.
(3) Two crew aircraft with twin engine.
(4) The wing had the same aerofoil profile and sweep compared with MiG-15.
(5) The airntake was divided into three, the center duct fed air to the front RD-45F engine, side duct passing on each side of the cockpit fed the air to the rear RD-45F engine.
(6) The cockpit was unpressurized.
(7) The left seat was occupied by the captain, the right seat was occupied by the radar operator.
(8) Armament : two N-37 cannons.
R-1
(1) The first flight was 1949/4/16.
(2) radar delayed to install.
(3) Problems were wing drop (from 930 to 940km/h) and roll instability at Mach 0.895.
R-2
(1) Completed in 1949/11.
(2) Engine : VK-1 (2700KG each).
(3) Larger windscreen and canopy.
(4) Radar : Toriy-A.
 

Attachments

  • I-320_170329_01.jpg
    I-320_170329_01.jpg
    195.4 KB · Views: 225
  • I-320_170329_02.jpg
    I-320_170329_02.jpg
    175.9 KB · Views: 158
  • I-320_170329_03.jpg
    I-320_170329_03.jpg
    198 KB · Views: 159
  • I-320_170329_04.jpg
    I-320_170329_04.jpg
    112.5 KB · Views: 137
  • I-320_170329_05.jpg
    I-320_170329_05.jpg
    90.5 KB · Views: 127
Last edited:

Attachments

  • Mig-I-320-R-1 (1).jpg
    Mig-I-320-R-1 (1).jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 117
  • Mig-I-320-R-1 (2).jpg
    Mig-I-320-R-1 (2).jpg
    47.6 KB · Views: 124
  • I-320 R-3.jpg
    I-320 R-3.jpg
    93.7 KB · Views: 101
Last edited:

Attachments

  • I-320.JPG
    I-320.JPG
    97.2 KB · Views: 125
  • 18216827_1911188025816906_948255312402151844_o.jpg
    18216827_1911188025816906_948255312402151844_o.jpg
    124.3 KB · Views: 131
  • 18156474_1911187972483578_3903621921236467767_o.jpg
    18156474_1911187972483578_3903621921236467767_o.jpg
    104 KB · Views: 119
  • 18192659_1911187892483586_8316456906943906635_o.jpg
    18192659_1911187892483586_8316456906943906635_o.jpg
    82.1 KB · Views: 100
  • 18193233_1911187895816919_6826725324224148520_o.jpg
    18193233_1911187895816919_6826725324224148520_o.jpg
    108.6 KB · Views: 105
  • 18193324_1911187962483579_3426847873859028173_o.jpg
    18193324_1911187962483579_3426847873859028173_o.jpg
    84.9 KB · Views: 101
  • 18209261_1911187899150252_2519225649377544143_o.jpg
    18209261_1911187899150252_2519225649377544143_o.jpg
    80.8 KB · Views: 106
  • 20691_rd.jpg
    20691_rd.jpg
    303.9 KB · Views: 111
  • Photo_37.jpg
    Photo_37.jpg
    86.9 KB · Views: 126
Last edited:
Performance and data shown can be found in the link below:


It is a rather odd and portly looking plane. How did this aircraft fare against other designs? Did it have any advantages/disadvantages?
 
Some additional info
 

Attachments

  • img516.jpg
    img516.jpg
    781 KB · Views: 111
  • img517.jpg
    img517.jpg
    313.5 KB · Views: 109
  • img518.jpg
    img518.jpg
    476.9 KB · Views: 105
  • img519.jpg
    img519.jpg
    711.4 KB · Views: 100
  • img521.jpg
    img521.jpg
    870.4 KB · Views: 114
  • img522.jpg
    img522.jpg
    554 KB · Views: 123
  • img523.jpg
    img523.jpg
    565.7 KB · Views: 128
  • img524.jpg
    img524.jpg
    567.4 KB · Views: 113
  • img525.jpg
    img525.jpg
    570.8 KB · Views: 115
  • img526.jpg
    img526.jpg
    323.7 KB · Views: 171

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom