MBB KOLAS tactical ballistic missile [TECHNEX / KOLAS]

Grey Havoc

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
9 October 2009
Messages
21,129
Reaction score
12,216
Does anyone have any detailed information on this program from the late 1980s? All I have on it is that it was a contemporary of ATACMS, "conceived as a delivery vehicle for advanced conventional submunitions in the FOFA mission". Messerschmidt-Bolkow-Blohm was developing the missile on behalf of the West German government, with help from Martin-Marietta. Program started around 1985 and was effectively cancelled for dubious PR reasons by Chancellor Kohl in 1989. Mentioned in passing in this old dissertation.
 
Re: MBB KOLAS tactical ballistic missile

Germany instead was going for a dual-use nuclear/conventional SRBM with 490 km range - to stay under the 500 km INF treaty limit* - as a possible successor for both Lance and Pershing. 250 missiles planned - pretty much a one-to-one replacement of Pershing and Lance. Work was started around 1983 (then with 700-800 km range requirement, same as Pershing 1A - reduced in 1987 with INF) and ran under the codenames "Technex" (missile) and "Kolas" (warhead). Developed by MBB together with Martin Marietta where it ran under the designations "T3NP" and "T3ND". The conventional warhead for this missile was supposed to be similar to Assault Breaker, warheads were secretly tested in Meppen/Germany and White Sands during the late 80s. Introduction was planned for around 1991, because INF mandated removal of the Pershings by then.


The whole thing was considered pretty much an internal Bundeswehr affair, and was cancelled in early 1989 after it was leaked to the media and the government didn't back them up. The cancelling was due to fearing international repercussions - Germany was criticized at the time for supplying chemical weapons to Iraq, a "domestic" SRBM on top would have been too much.


Financing for the project was pretty shady. Manfred Wörner basically considerably overpaid Caspar Weinberger on the Pershing deal in 1983 in which the Bundeswehr took over older Pershing 1A stationed in Germany; this overpaid money was then slowly leaked into the project under other work titles - e.g. in 1986 Technex was covered up as an "air defense technology R&D project". Other money under the same deal was used e.g. for semi-cooperative projects such as German RAM procurement and purportedly R&D projects for BMD/SDI.


Germany and the USA were drifting apart a bit politically at the time (due to US demands for the German Navy to take part in the Tanker War in 1987 and for German fleet subs for the Atlantic and German minesweepers for the Red Sea in 1983) - hence why there wasn't simply a cooperative project, especially in such a sensitive area.
Source: http://www.worldaffairsboard.com/ground-warfare/59671-t-95-baby-8.html
Another source in German:
 
Re: MBB KOLAS tactical ballistic missile

Thanks fightingirish! Quite interesting. I'll update the title accordingly.
 
Via an old JPRS report:

Bonn Reportedly Considers Development of New
Short-Range Missiles
AU0702124489 Hamburg DIE WELT in German
7 Feb 89 p 4

[Report by "RMC": "Bonn Considers New Air Defense
Concept"]

[Text] Bonn—The development of missiles to attack
enemy airports in central Europe is possible in a technically
and financially acceptable scope. This is the result
of studies prepared by various German and U.S. companies.
Deputies of the Bundestag Defense and Budget
Committees have been informed about these studies. At
the focus of considerations is the question of how to
improve NATO's air defense against the Warsaw Pact's
strong Air Forces.

At the beginning of a conflict, missiles equipped with
conventional and chemical weapons, as well as aircraft
of the East would destroy NATO bases where air attack
forces are deployed, as well as Western air defense
missile bases within a few hours; as a result, the Warsaw
Pact would achieve superiority in the air, which would
give its attacking ground forces a major advantage.

By order of the Bonn Defense Ministry, the Munichbased
MBB [Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm] company
in cooperation with U.S. firms has developed a concept
that is intended to take the edge off the East's superiority.
What they have in mind is the development of
missiles that are supposed to carry a number of smaller
conventionally equipped warheads over several hundred
kilometers to their target in a ballistic trajectory.

At the beginning of a conflict, these missiles would
"paralyze" the home bases of Warsaw Pact aircraft by
destroying the runways and other facilities; the returning
aircraft would have to go to alternative bases that are less
well protected by their air defense.

NATO's counterattack forces could reach and attack
these bases more easily.

The concept envisages the construction of cross-country
vehicles for transporting two such missiles. Because of
their mobility, they would be difficult to track by the
enemy. They could be launched from hidden positions,
and owing to their quick reaction capability, they could
attack the Warsaw Pact's bases in the initial phase of an
attack by the East.

Experts told DIE WELT that the new air defense concept
is exclusively confined to the use of conventional arms.
It has nothing to do with nuclear warheads. The missile
is supposed to launch a "dispenser" that carries subammunition
[submunition] over the target—in most cases
an air base—and, guided by a radar image of the target,
releases several dozen mini-missiles at a rate of 1 and lh
times the speed of sound. They penetrate concrete surfaces,
and by the explosion of their warheads create
relatively large craters.

The study concept, called "Technex," can enter the
phase of exact performance definition this year, if the
Federal Government and Parliament allocate the
required sum of DM250 million.
 
Germany didn't procure such munitions, and AFAIK didn't even develop them.
There are such missiles, though;
ATACMS Block II
LORA
Iskander
Prithvi II

I wrote about such missiles a little years ago.

Post-Gulf War '91, the Luftwaffe rather focused on integrating the NVA air forces, processing what new secrets were learned about WP systems such as R-73 and modernising Tornados with PGMs in a shift from very low level attack to above-ManPADS-ceiling attack.
 
See http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13493659.html

KOLAS : "Komplimentäres Luftangriffssystem" (complementary air attack system).
According to the article in the Spiegel magazine, a ballistic rocket system, developed in colaboration
with Martin-Marietta. The program probably started in the early '80s, budegt was hidden in several
innocous titles. Intended at first to have a range of 700 to 800 km, but cut back, due to US-SU
arms control agreements to a range of 480 km.
 
Found some stuff on TECHNEX:
in this presentation about warhead development by TDW, there are pictures of a test with penetrating submunitions
TECHNEX.jpg
there are also a bunch of documents on it in the Federal German archive under the title
Technex (Technologie- und Experimentalprogramm) zur Entwicklung eines konventionellen Sprengkopfes für Mittelstreckenraketen, Nachfolge PERSHING, Flugkörperstudien
Technex (Technology and Experimental Program) for the development of a conventional warhead for medium-range missiles, successor to PERSHING, missile studies.
There is also this request for information by the Bundestag SPD caucus with a bunch of questions on ATACMS and TECHNEX
Partial translation:
(10) What goals is the federal government pursuing with the Technex program, and what results have been achieved so far under this program?

The TECHNEX program includes studies in the field of ballistic missile system technologies for engagement of a wide range of targets with conventional munitions.
The purpose of the program is to investigate technological options for preparing decision bases for the design of conventional ballistic systems. The studies have been completed and the data are currently being analyzed.

(11) What funds have already been spent on the Technex program, and what funds are been spent, and what funds are still budgeted for this program?

For TECHNEX, there are total contractual commitments of DM 51 million and $21 million. DM 24.7 million has been budgeted for 1988 and DM 5 million for 1989.

(12) Does the Technex program include options for a Lance successor system in a conventional role being studied?

No. TECHNEX is a general, non-system-specific component-level technology program. Also compare response to questions 7 through 9.

(13) Does the Technex program involve cooperation with companies and services of other NATO countries, and if so, with which ones?

The main U.S. services and companies involved in TECHNEX are as follows.
and companies are involved:
-US Department of Defense
-US Army Missile Command
-Holloman AFB
-Fa. Martin Marietta
-Fa. Loral

Translated with DeepL
 
I unexpectedly found some information on TECHNEX in a book about the MAN Technologie company:
Apparently Martin Marietta was lead contractor and responsible for the development of the missile while MBB developed the sub-munitions and Diehl and MAN formed a joint company (MDG) to develop the launcher.
The launch vehicle carried two missiles, was protected against small-arms and was configured to be able to use German roads without a police escort.
Interestingly the book also notes that the INF treaty didnt lead to the cancellation of the project but just caused a reorganization with MDG taking over from Martin Marietta as lead contractor.
The project was only cancelled in 1989 because of the reduction of tensions in Europe.
 

Attachments

  • TECHNEXlauncher.jpg
    TECHNEXlauncher.jpg
    3.9 MB · Views: 88
Last edited:
If it's range was under 500km then it was an INF Treaty-compliant system.

I suspect there were debates about whether a missile with a deliberately nerfed range would still be INF-compliant. By the 2010s, the presumption was that it was OK (especially with the Russians cheating on INF themselves) but back in the 1980s, there was more interest in the spirit of the treaty.

But if there was no US involvement, INF wouldn't apply anyway. Hence the removal of the US contractor.
 
Digitized version of the article (without the images) can be found here
Around the ears (its a german phrase, up to his ears might be a better translation, but it can also mean explode/blow up)
The Defense Ministry had to stop its missile studies; the chancellor demanded "damage limitation" from Scholz.
12.02.1989 from DER SPIEGEL 7/1989

On Ash Wednesday morning, it became too much for the chancellor. "What are you actually doing up there?" Helmut Kohl harangued his defense minister on the telephone. He expected a status report within an hour.

The chancellor's carnival mood had been spoiled by a report in the TV magazine "Report" that the Munich-based armaments company Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm (MBB), together with the American "Pershing" manufacturer Martin Marietta, was developing a missile that could fly 490 kilometers and carry a nuclear warhead as well as conventional ammunition.

Punctually as ordered, Rupert Scholz arrived at the Chancellor's Office at 10:30 am. He had, he confessed, only just begun to consider the project. "Is it absolutely necessary for you to pursue this?" Kohl asked his defense minister and the only military man in the room, press spokesman Colonel Winfried Dunkel.

The colonel tried to persuade the chancellor that a missile using conventional munitions to destroy runways "makes perfect sense." In order to paralyze the enemy air force, bombardments with low-flying combat aircraft would then be largely superfluous. This would also greatly reduce low-flying training over the Federal Republic of Germany.

But Kohl did not want to get involved in such arguments. He told the audience that he was only concerned with "damage limitation". If the Germans - who were already the target of criticism from West and East because of their assistance in the construction of poisonous weapons and missiles - now also built their own short-range missile, "we'll get our ears blown off worldwide". (I would guess this refers to Iraq)

Scholz understood; He "didn't necessarily have to have the thing. Government spokesman Friedhelm Ost was allowed to announce that Bonn would not "pursue" the "Technex" experimental program for the time being because of the "positive disarmament signals from the Warsaw Pact".

Hardthöhen spokesman Dunkel and his MBB colleague Udo Philipp, however, continued to cause confusion. It is not about a rocket at all, but only about a warhead that is supposed to tear craters in concrete runways with "daughter projectiles". (Submunitions)

But what is the point of a warhead without a delivery system? In the advertising brochures of MBB and Martin Marietta there is also information about a missile and the carrier vehicle. Martin Marietta even depicts two missile variants with the designations T3NP and T3ND in full detail. (I would love to see those brochures)

MBB, the U.S. company and nine other German defense firms have so far received 88 million marks from the Bonn defense ministry for their work; this year, another five million will be due. The money was spent on about 30 researchers - and on secret experiments with warheads at the German test site in Meppen and the American missile firing range at White Sands in the state of New Mexico.

The Bundestag's budget committee could have known about the project if it had asked. The expenditures, as committee chairman Rudi Walther (SPD) found out last week, were hidden under several "harmless titles" in the chapter on "Defense Technology Development and Testing."

The parliamentarians only learned more about the "missile with the Mercedes star" (SPD Member of Parliament Gernot Erler) - unofficially - in December of last year, when a representative of Martin Marietta thrust a 19-page MBB paper into the hand of MP Walther "between door and door". (in passing)

Initial considerations for the conventional short-range missile had already been made in the early 1980s. In the 1983 Bundeswehr Plan, then Inspector General Wolfgang Altenburg called for a successor system to the 72 Pershing 1A nuclear missiles of the Bundeswehr; at that time, the idea arose of designing the Pershing successor to be dual-purpose, i.e., for nuclear and conventional warheads.

In 1985, Scholz's predecessor Manfred Wörner invented a "European Defense Initiative" as a complement to the American SDI concept; the "extended air defense" was to shoot down not only aircraft but also missiles of the enemy. Wörner then secretly had "Technex" converted into an attack system. The Federal Security Council (chaired by Helmut Kohl) gave its approval on July 24, 1985. According to a secret Hardthöhen directive dated October 7, 1985, a conventional warhead was to be designed for the Pershing successor: "Range 700 to 800 kilometers."

But nothing came of it. In 1987, the Americans and the Soviets agreed to dismantle medium-range weapons with a range of 500 to 5,000 kilometers.

In order not to deprive industry of the study funds ("up to a maximum of 100 million marks") approved by the Federal Security Council, Wörner ordered at the end of 1987 that the planned missile should not fly further than 490 kilometers; it is now known in thick papers in the defense ministry as the "Complementary Air Attack System" (Kolas).
The MBB people quickly found a justification for the new firing system. Missiles for attacks on Eastern bloc airfields were necessary because the strong air defenses would shoot down half of the Western fighter-bombers - like the MBB "Tornado" - in three days. And 250 missiles only cost a good three billion marks - in contrast to the 35 billion that German taxpayers have had to spend on some 300 Tornadoes.

These sales arguments of the "defense technology" department led to a domestic quarrel with the "aircraft" division at MBB last week: the super bird "Tornado" almost worthless? What should the members of parliament say, who had just been made to believe that the 100 billion project "Fighter 90" was necessary to guide low-flying Tornados into enemy territory and to strengthen the company's own air defenses? MBB is planning and firing everywhere.

Meanwhile, the Americans are not dwelling on studies. John Tower, the designated Secretary of Defense, informed the Senate that the "Mars" missile (launcher), which has already been introduced in Europe by the Bundeswehr and the U.S. Army, is "currently" planned as the launcher for the "Lance" successor missile "Atacms" (range: 480 kilometers), which can be deployed both conventionally and nuclear.

This would increase the number of launchers for nuclear and conventional short-range missiles stationed in Europe almost ninefold: instead of 88 Lance launchers, there would be 750 Mars launchers.


Translated with DeepL
 
Last edited:
To test the runway-penetrating submunitions for TECHNEX, Bayern-Chemie built a giant Davis gun.
It was jokingly called GRÖKAZ (größte Kanone aller Zeiten/biggest cannon of all time) and could accelerate 11kg projectiles to supersonic speeds for tests against concrete targets. It used water for the counter-mass.
Source
 

Attachments

  • GRÖKAZ.jpg
    GRÖKAZ.jpg
    4.2 MB · Views: 58
Back
Top Bottom