Guys,
This thread to discuss the merits (or not) of the last WWII battles opus from Spielberg, Hanks and Orloff.
View: https://youtu.be/98Ys1aI9a_Y?si=MOmjm5iTZctDI9E4
Here is a constructive critics(?)*:
arstechnica.com
Another one:
slate.com
* I am myself quite getting annoyed by the multiplication of graphic throwing up scenes in modern cinema. Not sharing at all the artistic sense of that nouvelle-vague
This thread to discuss the merits (or not) of the last WWII battles opus from Spielberg, Hanks and Orloff.
Here is a constructive critics(?)*:
Also, the vomiting. Dear Lord, the vomiting. There is a lot of throwing up in this show, folks. There's more puking in the first two episodes than in all of Band of Brothers and The Pacific put together—and it's not the polite, safe-for-daytime-TV the-actor-spits-out-a-small-mouthful-of-oatmeal kind of puking. It's full-on CGI-enhanced 4K-resolution multicolored particle-simulated firehose-of-chunky-industrial-waste puking, with multispeaker Dolby Atmos splatter effects and long, lingering camera shots of the aftermath that leave you enough time to visually identify what the character last ate.
I'd never criticize a show for going hard on realism, but maybe they could have dialed the puking back just a bit?

Masters of the Air: Imagine a bunch of people throwing up, including me
It’s a bad show. I wanted to love it, but it’s just not good.

Another one:

What’s Fact and What’s Fiction in Masters of the Air
Did the USAAF really have top-secret bombing tech? And did pilots really carry talismans into the air? We break down what’s true and what’s invention.
* I am myself quite getting annoyed by the multiplication of graphic throwing up scenes in modern cinema. Not sharing at all the artistic sense of that nouvelle-vague
Last edited: