Reply to thread

Message

Personally, with this kind of back office work I am wary of dismissing a drawing simply because it differs from some original drawing. There could well be other original drawings or similar evidence showing other variants studied, with minor or major differences. One must always ask, "which originals?" and keep an open mind. The Ae 607 is a good example of that. Then again, when a copyist lacks information they may embellish simply to create a publishable drawing - the Ae 607 seems to be an example of that as well.

[QUOTE="steelpillow, post: 319779, member: 10779"] Personally, with this kind of back office work I am wary of dismissing a drawing simply because it differs from some original drawing. There could well be other original drawings or similar evidence showing other variants studied, with minor or major differences. One must always ask, "which originals?" and keep an open mind. The Ae 607 is a good example of that. Then again, when a copyist lacks information they may embellish simply to create a publishable drawing - the Ae 607 seems to be an example of that as well. [/QUOTE]

Verification