Can I draw your attention to a Lockheed proposal for a Small Rigid Airship (SRA) going back to 1984.In the introduction to the paper they state "Engineers are no longer restricted to use the classical "Cigar" shapes of the past...Because we can form these new materials to more desirable aerodynamic shapes,we can now develop the small rigid airship to be a practical vehicle."
It goes on to say "These new SRAs will look more like 'Lifting Body Vehicles than Blimps".
The purpose of the paper was not to propose any particular design for the SRA but to discuss it's feasibility. The 'Starship' in their paper is around 160 feet long and 45 feet high.It was to be filled with Helium and hot air.
The abstact was written by Roy Gibbens of Lockheed.
Saw that already. Sure would like to see the paper in question.....Orionblamblam said:http://www.netwrx1.com/skunk-works/v05.n199
Can I draw your attention to a Lockheed proposal for a Small Rigid Airship (SRA) going back to 1984.In the introduction to the paper they state "Engineers are no longer restricted to use the classical "Cigar" shapes of the past...Because we can form these new materials to more desirable aerodynamic shapes,we can now develop the small rigid airship to be a practical vehicle."
It goes on to say "These new SRAs will look more like 'Lifting Body Vehicles than Blimps".
The purpose of the paper was not to propose any particular design for the SRA but to discuss it's feasibility. The 'Starship' in their paper is around 160 feet long and 45 feet high.It was to be filled with Helium and hot air.
The abstact was written by Roy Gibbens of Lockheed.
Saw that already. Sure would like to see the paper in question.....Orionblamblam said:
Can I draw your attention to a Lockheed proposal for a Small Rigid Airship (SRA) going back to 1984.In the introduction to the paper they state "Engineers are no longer restricted to use the classical "Cigar" shapes of the past...Because we can form these new materials to more desirable aerodynamic shapes,we can now develop the small rigid airship to be a practical vehicle."
It goes on to say "These new SRAs will look more like 'Lifting Body Vehicles than Blimps".
The purpose of the paper was not to propose any particular design for the SRA but to discuss it's feasibility. The 'Starship' in their paper is around 160 feet long and 45 feet high.It was to be filled with Helium and hot air.
The abstact was written by Roy Gibbens of Lockheed.
Interesting comments. I am the daughter of Roy Gibbens, and currently sifting through old papers and photographs. I came across the Lockheed Starship photos and google led me here. I’m happy to share docs with anyone interested- but looks like some of it online. He actually had a model of the starship hanging in his office. He was forever a designer and promoter of the use of airships.
Hi, Sue,Interesting comments. I am the daughter of Roy Gibbens, and currently sifting through old papers and photographs. I came across the Lockheed Starship photos and google led me here. I’m happy to share docs with anyone interested- but looks like some of it online. He actually had a model of the starship hanging in his office. He was forever a designer and promoter of the use of airships.
Anything you can contribute would be greatly appreciated! As far as I know we have only small fragments of your father's work on the small rigid airship concept.
Would you mind sharing it here as well? I've been fascinated by hybrid airships for a good period of time now and it's always nice to see something new. Thanks!Hi Pete, Wow! What an extensive collection articles! I got sidetracked with "life" - new grand baby and all that...I will be getting back to sifting through his papers and things soon. (He kept everything - and often duplicates...but not always in an organized fashion!) I will share what I come across hopefully in the next month. Thanks so much for your interest.
Sue Henderson