Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
From the article that [USER=12097]@TomcatViP[/USER] posted it appears that they have completely under estimated the time in hand or have been lying through their teeth. We've had talk of TR-3 being fully ready in a matter of months, but to then switch to a truncated TR-3 with Full Combat Capability being delivered to those aircraft by a software update a whole year later that late in the day points to either incompetence or someone not telling the truth until they could deny it no longer....To be honest if I was a customer I'm not sure I'd accept the truncated TR-3 on LM's assurance that a software update a year later would make my aircraft actually usable....could anyone actualy believe they would deliver that update on time and to specification?The only side that really benefits from TR-3 being accepted incomplete is LM....maybe they should start to feel some pain.And from that article it appears that Block IV has got even more issues with the JPO trying to salvage what they can, whilst delaying capabiities into the 2030's...For me the question is for how long does LM get away with it? Over promising and under delivering with real impact on the customers has to have a downside for them sooner rather than later...
From the article that [USER=12097]@TomcatViP[/USER] posted it appears that they have completely under estimated the time in hand or have been lying through their teeth. We've had talk of TR-3 being fully ready in a matter of months, but to then switch to a truncated TR-3 with Full Combat Capability being delivered to those aircraft by a software update a whole year later that late in the day points to either incompetence or someone not telling the truth until they could deny it no longer....
To be honest if I was a customer I'm not sure I'd accept the truncated TR-3 on LM's assurance that a software update a year later would make my aircraft actually usable....could anyone actualy believe they would deliver that update on time and to specification?
The only side that really benefits from TR-3 being accepted incomplete is LM....maybe they should start to feel some pain.
And from that article it appears that Block IV has got even more issues with the JPO trying to salvage what they can, whilst delaying capabiities into the 2030's...
For me the question is for how long does LM get away with it? Over promising and under delivering with real impact on the customers has to have a downside for them sooner rather than later...
