Lockheed CL-379 - A New VTOL-STOL

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
26 May 2006
Messages
33,572
Reaction score
13,701
Hi,

in Flightglobal site I read about the Lockheed CL-379 tilt-wing research
aircraft project,which was selected from more than 30 design-studies,
and more Info or drawings,please.

http://www.flightglobal.com/PDFArchive/View/1958/1958-1-%20-%200754.html
 
Here's an artists impression of the CL-379 "in action":
(from FlugWelt 1959)
 

Attachments

  • CL-379.jpg
    CL-379.jpg
    32.9 KB · Views: 965
Thank you my dears Orion and Jemiba,

but what was the competition for the US Army which tis project
involved in it ?.
 
http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=4695

adoc14ad.jpg


And it's cheap!
 
umm how can it stand on the ground with props forward as they touch the ground? Something's wrong.
 
looks like the wing tilts. It probably can't have the wing in the horizontal position while on the ground for the reason you mentioned.
 
The same principle obviously found favour again in a Saro project from
1967, the Saro P.5.39, although here ground clearance would have been
sufficient to allow for take-off with the wing not tilted. Question to me is,
would it really have been a VTOL, or just an ultra-STOL ? AFAIK, prototypes
actually built using this principle (Fairchild Fledgeling, Ryan Vertiplane) never
achieved true VTOL

(from "Kipprotorflugzeuge" by Alexander Lüdeke)
 

Attachments

  • Saunders_P-539.jpg
    Saunders_P-539.jpg
    31.4 KB · Views: 867
You can probably achieve takeoff within a fuselage length (I think this was quoted for the VZ-3), but no VTOL
 
Hi,

http://www.avia-it.com/act/biblioteca/periodici/PDF%20Riviste/Alata/Alata%201959%2001.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    604.2 KB · Views: 463
  • 2.png
    2.png
    560.3 KB · Views: 228
  • 3.png
    3.png
    244.2 KB · Views: 219
From Ailes 20/12/1958.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    404.7 KB · Views: 134
  • 2.png
    2.png
    234.9 KB · Views: 124
  • 3.png
    3.png
    346.4 KB · Views: 154
Ron Downey uploaded this brochure as a free version on his blog. I'll let everyone decide for themselves, if they want download this copy or rather buy it at OBB's blog.
Link:
 
I guess @Orionblamblam can confirm if it's his scan.
It is not. However, my scan has one additional page. I guess the only way people can judge which is better is to download Ron Downey's and buy mine and compare side to side.

It's the only reasonable approach.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom