"Be our guest"
If I had the answer to the question what a list of all the proposed or considered SDI weapon system concepts would contain, I would not be asking for it, just like seruriermarshal as the originator of this thread did. The correct and constructive response for a request of a list is a list, not just one or two isolated items, as has pretty consistently happened throughout this thread. Would a thread that followed this principle involve a lot of duplicate written information? Sure. Would it be a lot more user friendly response be by being able to find the most comprehensive set of information by simply going to the most recent message and start from there? Also true.
 
Last edited:
- Braduskill Interceptor
- X-Ray Laser
- NPB Neutral Particle Beam (Project Whitehorse)
- - - BEAR (Beam Experiements Aboard a Rocket
- SBL Space Based Laser
- HVG HyperVelocity Rail Gun (CHECMATE)
- GBL Ground Based Laser
- - - Combat Mirror
- - - Relay Mirror Experiment
- - - LACE (Low-power Atmospheric Compensation Experiment)
- SBKKV Space Based Kinetic Kill Vehicle
- BP Brilliant Pebbles
- - - Brilliant Eyes
- HOE (Homing Overlay Experiment)
- HEDI (KITE)
- ERINT (Extended Range INTerceptor)
-- LEAP Light ExoAtmospheric Projectile)
- ERIS


- BSTS (Boost Surveillance And Tracking System)
- SSTS (Space Surveillance and Tracking System)
- GSTS (Ground Surveillance and Tracking System)
- GBR-X
- - TIR (Terminal Imaging Radar)

Descendants of ERIS
GBI
KEI (Kinetic Energy Interceptor) - Like a smaller mobile version of GBI, carried on TELs with 2 missiles each. Cancelled.
SM-3 IA/IB/2A/2B (2B = not to be)
(THAAD used the tech, but is more a HEDI descendant)

Descendants of ERINT
Patriot PAC-2
Patriot PAC-3
Patriot PAC-3 MSE

Descendants of HEDI
THAAD

Descendants of HVG HyperVelocity Rail Gun (CHECMATE)
NORAD-NORTHCOM-led ABMS Onramp 2?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP9yxr9k53g


Descendants of BSTS
SBIRS High?

Descendants of SSTS
SBIRS Low -> SSTS (Renamed back again :D )

Descendants of GSTS
SBX-1 (Sea-Based X-Band)
LRDR (Long-Range Discrimination Radar)

If I had the answer to the question what a list of all the proposed or considered SDI weapon system concepts would contain, I would not be asking for it, just like seruriermarshal as the originator of this thread did. The correct and constructive response for a request of a list is a list, not just one or two isolated items, as has happened throughout this thread. Would a thread that followed this principle involve a lot of duplicate written information? Sure. Would it be a lot more user friendly by being able to find the most comprehensive set of information by simply going to the most recent message? Also true.

1661714517938.png

Further reading:

 
Last edited:
- Braduskill Interceptor
- X-Ray Laser
- NPB Neutral Particle Beam (Project Whitehorse)
- - - BEAR (Beam Experiements Aboard a Rocket
- SBL Space Based Laser
- HVG HyperVelocity Rail Gun (CHECMATE)
- GBL Ground Based Laser
- - - Combat Mirror
- - - Relay Mirror Experiment
- - - LACE (Low-power Atmospheric Compensation Experiment)
- SBKKV Space Based Kinetic Kill Vehicle
- BP Brilliant Pebbles
- - - Brilliant Eyes
- HOE (Homing Overlay Experiment)
- HEDI (KITE)
- ERINT (Extended Range INTerceptor)
-- LEAP Light ExoAtmospheric Projectile)
- ERIS


- BSTS (Boost Surveillance And Tracking System)
- SSTS (Space Surveillance and Tracking System)
- GSTS (Ground Surveillance and Tracking System)
- GBR-X
- - TIR (Terminal Imaging Radar)

Descendants of ERIS
GBI
KEI (Kinetic Energy Interceptor) - Like a smaller mobile version of GBI, carried on TELs with 2 missiles each. Cancelled.
SM-3 IA/IB/2A/2B (2B = not to be)
(THAAD used the tech, but is more a HEDI descendant)

Descendants of ERINT
Patriot PAC-2
Patriot PAC-3
Patriot PAC-3 MSE

Descendants of HEDI
THAAD

Descendants of HVG HyperVelocity Rail Gun (CHECMATE)
NORAD-NORTHCOM-led ABMS Onramp 2?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP9yxr9k53g


Descendants of BSTS
SBIRS High?

Descendants of SSTS
SBIRS Low -> SSTS (Renamed back again :D )

Descendants of GSTS
SBX-1 (Sea-Based X-Band)
LRDR (Long-Range Discrimination Radar)

If I had the answer to the question what a list of all the proposed or considered SDI weapon system concepts would contain, I would not be asking for it, just like seruriermarshal as the originator of this thread did. The correct and constructive response for a request of a list is a list, not just one or two isolated items, as has happened throughout this thread. Would a thread that followed this principle involve a lot of duplicate written information? Sure. Would it be a lot more user friendly by being able to find the most comprehensive set of information by simply going to the most recent message? Also true.

View attachment 683241

Further reading:

Update, apparently, as well as neutron beams, macron beams were studied. Macrons or macroscopic particles are tiny projectiles that sit on the border between the complex structures we see under a microscope and the far simpler molecules where we can count individual atoms.


High energy macrons are also capable of causing thermonuclear ignition.
 
APACHE was a TRW proposal for a phased-array chemical laser.

Sipapu was an early Army experimental neutral particle beam program. Chair Heritage was an early Navy charged particle beam program.

The ground-based free-electron laser was a significant Army program circa 1987-91, intended to be based at White Sands as well as a few other sites across the ZI and territories.

At least one of the national labs demonstrated a fission-fragment laser.
 
Last edited:
APACHE was a TRW proposal for a phased-array chemical laser.

Sipapu was an early Army experimental neutral particle beam program. Chair Heritage was an early Navy charged particle beam program.

The ground-based free-electron laser was a significant Army program circa 1987-91, intended to be based at White Sands as well as a few other sites across the ZI and territories.

At least one of the national labs demonstrated a fission-fragment laser.
APACHE

Brief mention of Chair Heritage

Sipapu
 
Last edited:
- Braduskill Interceptor
- NPB Neutral Particle Beam (Project Whitehorse)

- - Neutron Beam
- - Nuclei Beam
- - Macron Beam
- - - BEAR (Beam Experiements Aboard a Rocket
- - - Chair Heritage
- - - Sinapu
- SBL Space Based Laser
- - Chemical
- - - Zenith Star (H-Fl)
- - - SBL-IFX
- - - APACHE
- - Free Electron
- - Reactor Pumped (Fission fragments) Usually CO2, He-Ne, He-Ar, He-Kr
- - Nuclear Bomb Pumped
- - - Excalibur X-ray Laser
- - LAMP Mirror (Large Advanced Mirror Program)
- HVG HyperVelocity Rail Gun (CHECMATE)
- GBL Ground Based Laser

- - Chemical
- - - MIRACL (De-Fl)
- - Free Electron
- - - White Sands Free Electron Laser
- - Combat Mirror
- - Relay Mirror Experiment
- - LACE (Low-power Atmospheric Compensation Experiment)
- ABL Airborne Laser
- - Chemical
- - - COIL (O-I)
- SBKKV Space Based Kinetic Kill Vehicle
- BP Brilliant Pebbles

- - - Brilliant Eyes
- HOE (Homing Overlay Experiment)
- HEDI (KITE)
- ERINT (Extended Range INTerceptor)

-- LEAP Light ExoAtmospheric Projectile)
- ERIS


- BSTS (Boost Surveillance And Tracking System)
- SSTS (Space Surveillance and Tracking System)
- GSTS (Ground Surveillance and Tracking System)
- GBR-X

- - TIR (Terminal Imaging Radar)

Descendants of ERIS
GBI
KEI (Kinetic Energy Interceptor) - Like a smaller mobile version of GBI, carried on TELs with 2 missiles each. Cancelled.
SM-3 IA/IB/2A/2B (2B = not to be)
(THAAD used the tech, but is more a HEDI descendant)

Descendants of ERINT
Patriot PAC-2
Patriot PAC-3
Patriot PAC-3 MSE

Descendants of HEDI
THAAD

Descendants of HVG HyperVelocity Rail Gun (CHECMATE)
NORAD-NORTHCOM-led ABMS Onramp 2?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP9yxr9k53g


Descendants of BSTS
SBIRS High?

Descendants of SSTS
SBIRS Low -> SSTS (Renamed back again :D )

Descendants of GSTS
SBX-1 (Sea-Based X-Band)
LRDR (Long-Range Discrimination Radar)



Further reading:

 
Last edited:
Ah, there was also the MARAUDER (USAF Phillips Lab) plasma railgun.

And for sensors, the Airborne Optical Adjunct and Airborne Optical System.
 
Last edited:
Ah, there was also the MARAUDER (USAF Phillips Lab) plasma railgun.

And for sensors, the Airborne Optical Adjunct and Airborne Optical System.
MARAUDER

Airborne Optical Adjunct

Airborne Optical System
 
- Braduskill Interceptor
- NPB Neutral Particle Beam (Project Whitehorse)

- - Neutron Beam
- - Nuclei Beam
- - Macron Beam
- - - BEAR (Beam Experiements Aboard a Rocket
- - - Chair Heritage
- - - Sinapu
- SBL Space Based Laser
- - Chemical
- - - Zenith Star (H-Fl)
- - - SBL-IFX
- - - APACHE
- - Free Electron
- - Reactor Pumped (Fission fragments) Usually CO2, He-Ne, He-Ar, He-Kr
- - Nuclear Bomb Pumped
- - - Excalibur X-ray Laser
- - LAMP Mirror (Large Advanced Mirror Program)
- HVG HyperVelocity Rail Gun
- - CHECMATE (Compact High Energy Capacitor Module Advanced Technology Experiment)
- - MARAUDER (Magnetically Accelerated Rings to Achieve Ultrahigh Directed Energy and Radiation
- GBL Ground Based Laser

- - Chemical
- - - MIRACL (De-Fl)
- - Free Electron
- - - White Sands Free Electron Laser
- - Combat Mirror
- - Relay Mirror Experiment
- - LACE (Low-power Atmospheric Compensation Experiment)
- ABL Airborne Laser
- - Chemical
- - - COIL (O-I)
- SBKKV Space Based Kinetic Kill Vehicle
- BP Brilliant Pebbles

- - - Brilliant Eyes
- HOE (Homing Overlay Experiment)
- HEDI (KITE)
- ERINT (Extended Range INTerceptor)

-- LEAP Light ExoAtmospheric Projectile)
- ERIS


- BSTS (Boost Surveillance And Tracking System)
- SSTS (Space Surveillance and Tracking System)
- AOS (Airborne Optical Adjunct)

- - AOA (Airborne Optical Adjunct) Late '80s D&T aircraft for AOS
- GSTS (Ground Surveillance and Tracking System)
- GBR-X

- - TIR (Terminal Imaging Radar)

Descendants of ERIS
GBI
KEI (Kinetic Energy Interceptor) - Like a smaller mobile version of GBI, carried on TELs with 2 missiles each. Cancelled.
SM-3 IA/IB/2A/2B (2B = not to be)
(THAAD used the tech, but is more a HEDI descendant)

Descendants of ERINT
Patriot PAC-2
Patriot PAC-3
Patriot PAC-3 MSE

Descendants of HEDI
THAAD

Descendants of HVG HyperVelocity Rail Gun (CHECMATE)
NORAD-NORTHCOM-led ABMS Onramp 2?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP9yxr9k53g


Descendants of BSTS
SBIRS High?

Descendants of SSTS
SBIRS Low -> SSTS (Renamed back again :D )

Descendants of GSTS
SBX-1 (Sea-Based X-Band)
LRDR (Long-Range Discrimination Radar)



Further reading:

...
 
I want to say LEAP was designed to be fired from the SDI railgun/light gas gun in orbit, but I don't have any documents to back that up, except something about a microelectronic processor or sensor fit for LEAP being tested at high g-loads to simulate gunfire. Its eventual employment on SM-3 was more incidental than anything AIUI.
 
- Braduskill Interceptor
- NPB Neutral Particle Beam (Project Whitehorse)

- - Neutron Beam
- - Nuclei Beam
- - Macron Beam
- - - BEAR (Beam Experiements Aboard a Rocket
- - - Chair Heritage
- - - Sinapu
- SBL Space Based Laser
- - Chemical
- - - Zenith Star (H-Fl)
- - - SBL-IFX
- - - APACHE
- - Free Electron
- - Reactor Pumped (Fission fragments) Usually CO2, He-Ne, He-Ar, He-Kr
- - Nuclear Bomb Pumped
- - - Excalibur X-ray Laser
- - LAMP Mirror (Large Advanced Mirror Program)
- HVG HyperVelocity Rail Gun
- - CHECMATE (Compact High Energy Capacitor Module Advanced Technology Experiment)
- - MARAUDER (Magnetically Accelerated Rings to Achieve Ultrahigh Directed Energy and Radiation
- GBL Ground Based Laser

- - Chemical
- - - MIRACL (De-Fl)
- - Free Electron
- - - White Sands Free Electron Laser
- - Combat Mirror
- - Relay Mirror Experiment
- - LACE (Low-power Atmospheric Compensation Experiment)
- ABL Airborne Laser
- - Chemical
- - - COIL (O-I)
- SBKKV Space Based Kinetic Kill Vehicle
- BP Brilliant Pebbles

- - - Brilliant Eyes
- HOE (Homing Overlay Experiment)
- HEDI (KITE)
- ERINT (Extended Range INTerceptor)

-- LEAP Light ExoAtmospheric Projectile)
- ERIS


- BSTS (Boost Surveillance And Tracking System)
- SSTS (Space Surveillance and Tracking System)
- AOS (Airborne Optical Adjunct)

- - AOA (Airborne Optical Adjunct) Late '80s D&T aircraft for AOS
- GSTS (Ground Surveillance and Tracking System)
- GBR-X

- - TIR (Terminal Imaging Radar)

Descendants of ERIS
GBI
KEI (Kinetic Energy Interceptor) - Like a smaller mobile version of GBI, carried on TELs with 2 missiles each. Cancelled.
SM-3 IA/IB/2A/2B (2B = not to be)
(THAAD used the tech, but is more a HEDI descendant)

Descendants of ERINT
Patriot PAC-2
Patriot PAC-3
Patriot PAC-3 MSE

Descendants of HEDI
THAAD

Descendants of HVG HyperVelocity Rail Gun (CHECMATE)
NORAD-NORTHCOM-led ABMS Onramp 2?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP9yxr9k53g


Descendants of BSTS
SBIRS High?

Descendants of SSTS
SBIRS Low -> SSTS (Renamed back again :D )

Descendants of GSTS
SBX-1 (Sea-Based X-Band)
LRDR (Long-Range Discrimination Radar)



Further reading:

...
Great List!

Since you included some experiments, like HOE, I would add the Delta 180 (Vector Sum), 181 (Thrusted Vector), and 183 (Delta Star) experiments to your list.

Under GBL, I would also add the Excimer laser project EMRLD (Excimer Moderate-powered Raman-shifted Laser Device) as a sub-bullet to the GBL. As stated at https://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/gbl.htm "SDIO conducted competition among three types of beam generators for the ground-based laser: excimer laser, radio frequency FEL, and induction FEL. SDIO designed and built a portion of the excimer gas laser device called Excimer Moderate Powered Raman Shifted baser [sic] Device and installed it at the High Energy baser [sic] Systems Test Facility at the White Sands Missile Range. The objectives of this program were to build and test an excirner laser to demonstrate the technology necessary for a high-power, repetitively pulsed, excimer laser and develop a theoretical model through a series of low-energy experiments. In 1989, SDIO eliminated the excimer laser as a candidate for the ground-based laser beam generator because of technical difficulties encountered during the White Sands Missile Range test, its low electrical efficiency, and the difficulty in propagating its short wavelength beam through the atmosphere. SDIO spent $169 million developing the excimer before it canceled the program."

By the way, during the hey day of SDI in the mid- to late 1980s, I worked for ANSER Corp., as project leader for Directed Energy Weapons, performing technical analyses and assessments of directed energy weapons and electro-optical sensors, including laser radars, for SDIO and the HQ Air Force Directorate of Strategic Defense and Space. I was involved in analyses and assessments of the following items on your list plus some of the suggested additions above:

- Braduskill Interceptor (EO sensors and laser radar for this concept)
- NPB Neutral Particle Beam (Project Whitehorse)
- - Neutron Beam
- - Nuclei Beam
- - - BEAR (Beam Experiments Aboard a Rocket)
- SBL Space Based Laser
- - Chemical (Alpha Laser)
- - - Zenith Star (H-Fl)
- - Nuclear Bomb Pumped
- - - Excalibur X-ray Laser
- - LAMP Mirror (Large Advanced Mirror Program)
- GBL Ground Based Laser
- - Chemical
- - - MIRACL (De-Fl)
- - Free Electron Laser
- - - White Sands Free Electron Laser
- - Excimer Laser
- - - EMRLD (Excimer Moderate-powered Raman-shifted Laser Device)
- - Relay Mirror Experiment
- - LACE (Low-power Atmospheric Compensation Experiment)
- SBKKV Space Based Kinetic Kill Vehicle (EO Sensors and laser radar for this concept)
- BP Brilliant Pebbles
- - - Brilliant Eyes
- HOE (Homing Overlay Experiment)
- Delta 181 Thrusted Vector Experiment
- BSTS (Boost Surveillance And Tracking System)
- SSTS (Space Surveillance and Tracking System)
- AOS (Airborne Optical Adjunct)
- - AOA (Airborne Optical Adjunct) Late '80s D&T aircraft for AOS
- GSTS (Ground Surveillance and Tracking System)
 
Here are some more recent descendants of ERIS that should be included on the list of ERIS descendants:

Redesigned Kill Vehicle (RKV) which was to be the follow-on to the current Ground-Based Interceptors (GBI).

Multi-Object Kill Vehicle (MOKV) which was to be the replacement for the RKV when it was cancelled.

Next Generation Interceptor (NGI) which replaced MOKV when it was cancelled, but which also resurrected many of the concepts developed under MOKV.

Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (ABMD) system, which is a ship-based midcourse intercept system for short to intermediate range ballistic missiles.

I worked on some aspects of MOKV before I retired from Lockheed Martin in 2017.
 
I want to say LEAP was designed to be fired from the SDI railgun/light gas gun in orbit, but I don't have any documents to back that up, except something about a microelectronic processor or sensor fit for LEAP being tested at high g-loads to simulate gunfire. Its eventual employment on SM-3 was more incidental than anything AIUI.
Information on LEAP from the report at https://www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk2/1988/8837/8837.PDF entitled "SDI: Technology, Survivability, and Software, May 1988":

"The SDIO has consolidated the development of light-weight projectiles for all kinetic energy programs into the “Light-weight Exo-atmospheric Projectile” (LEAP) program. Although researchers first saw a need for light-weight projectiles for railguns, the primary initial users of LEAP technology are to be the chemical rocket KEW programs (SBI, ERIS, HEDI). The phase-one LEAP projectile would weigh about 5 kg according to current designs (see figure 5-9), if all component developments met their goals. This projectile would weigh too much for any railgun, and it will therefore not be tested at high acceleration. This technology might evolve into a 2-kg projectile by the early 1990s. In any case, there are no plans now to build a gun big enough to test even the phase-two 2 kilogram projectile."

The above link also has information on many other SDI projects. The excerpt on LEAP is from Chapter 5 entitled "Ballistic Missile Defense Technology: Weapons, Power, Communications, and Space Transportation," page 120.
 
Link: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA224950.pdf

1990 Report to Congress - Strategic Defense Initiative
Always full of little gems these reports.

The shorter wavelengths of a laser radar permit high resolution with smaller apertures than other radars. Many high-resolution laser radar measurements have already been obtained. Our Firepond laser radar facility, the result of 4 years of development, began to measure target dynamics following target launches from Wallops Island with the successful Firefly flight in March 1990. A space-qualifiable laser radar suitable for discrimination of RVs 3 from decoys is scheduled for delivery in 1992.

In 1985 we demonstrated at low power the capability to both track a rocket in space and propagate a laser beam through the atmosphere without significant distortion. In several other experiments, we proved lasers are lethal weapons for destroying both solid and liquid propellant missiles.
In 1986 our first particle beam experiment irradiated a miniature RV with a high intensity proton beam. The results indicated that the conventional explosives contained in an RV can be detonated by such beams.
Early in the program many experts had stated that building large optics would be impossible and prohibitively expensive. In 1988 we built a high quality mirror, the first large-diameter segmented mirror with a surface that is controlled electronically. That mirror will be integrated into a ground test in 1991.
The Talon-Gold ground test demonstrated our ability to place a beam on target very accurately. The next challenge is to do it in space--the Starlab experiment currently planned for 1992. In this experiment we seek precision equivalent to firing a laser from high above the Empire State building to hit a volleyball on a California beach.
Phased-array microwave source 10-gigawatt source for microwave beam
 
Last edited:
Link: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA224950.pdf

1990 Report to Congress - Strategic Defense Initiative
Always full of little gems these reports.

The shorter wavelengths of a laser radar permit high resolution with smaller apertures than other radars. Many high-resolution laser radar measurements have already been obtained. Our Firepond laser radar facility, the result of 4 years of development, began to measure target dynamics following target launches from Wallops Island with the successful Firefly flight in March 1990. A space-qualifiable laser radar suitable for discrimination of RVs 3 from decoys is scheduled for delivery in 1992.

In 1985 we demonstrated at low power the capability to both track a rocket in space and propagate a laser beam through the atmosphere without significant distortion. In several other experiments, we proved lasers are lethal weapons for destroying both solid and liquid propellant missiles.
In 1986 our first particle beam experiment irradiated a miniature RV with a high intensity proton beam. The results indicated that the conventional explosives contained in an RV can be detonated by such beams.
Early in the program many experts had stated that building large optics would be impossible and prohibitively expensive. In 1988 we built a high quality mirror, the first large-diameter segmented mirror with a surface that is controlled electronically. That mirror will be integrated into a ground test in 1991.
The Talon-Gold ground test demonstrated our ability to place a beam on target very accurately. The next challenge is to do it in space--the Starlab experiment currently planned for 1992. In this experiment we seek precision equivalent to firing a laser from high above the Empire State building to hit a volleyball on a California beach.
Phased-array microwave source 10-gigawatt source for microwave beam
Those are very interesting excerpts from the 1990 report.

The space qualifiable laser radar suitable for discrimination scheduled for delivery in 1992 mentioned in the excerpt from the 1990 report, was not the first such laser radar.

The Delta 181 Thrusted Vector Experiment (TVE), launched 8 February 1988 and reentered 2 April 1988, had a space-qualified CO2 laser-based coherent Doppler laser radar (ladar) which was used to collect range-Doppler imagery and target vibration data on test objects to provide data for the development and testing of RV discrimination algorithms. A small company called CLS (a subsidiary of Litton Laser Systems) under contract to Martin Marietta built the laser radar and Martin Marietta performed the space qualification and system integration. This was the first coherent detection laser radar flown in space. (There were prior direct detection laser radars flown in space.)

I worked on some analyses and assessments of some of the Delta 181 TVE experimental sensor data when I worked at ANSER Corporation in the late 1980s.

Relevant Links:

https://www.jhuapl.edu/Content/techdigest/pdf/V13-N01/13-01-Coughlin.pdf (p. 206)

https://www.jhuapl.edu/Content/techdigest/pdf/V11-N1-2/11-01-Dassoulas.pdf (p. 92)

http://highfrontier.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Canavan-Heritage.pdf (p. 33)

https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/tve.htm


http://k1dcs.com/cls/index.htm


Also, there were at least 3 programs for development of airborne and space-based CO2 coherent laser radars for strategic defense applications in the late 1980s to early 1990s: SDIO's Low Weight KEW Active Tracker (LOWKATER), Army SDC's Airborne Laser Experiment (ALE), and MIT Lincoln Laboratory's space based CO2 laser radar research and development program.

See: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA207052.pdf

Also See: https://www.academia.edu/7633417/History_of_Laser_radar_in_The_United_States (p. 7) for a page with some brief details on LOWKATER and Firepond.
 
Last edited:
A nuclear lightbulb concept itself weaponizable as a beam thrower?
While interesting, your question is a bit off topic for this particular thread since I don't know of any SDI projects investigating the nuclear lightbulb concept as a weapon.

That being said, I can hypothesize two ways that the nuclear lightbulb might be used to pump a laser weapon:

1. Replace the hydrogen propellant with a suitable laser gas such as CO2 to drive a Gas Dynamic Laser (GDL) - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_dynamic_laser

2. Use the ultraviolet radiation produced by the nuclear lightbulb to drive an optically pumped laser - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optic... a process,as to achieve population inversion.

Given the high temperature environment in the nuclear lightbulb reactor, the optically pumped medium would likely need to be a gas, or maybe a liquid. I do not know the spectrum of the nuclear lightbulb's radiation, other than the references I've seen mentioning that it is concentrated in the UV. If the radiation is broadband, then using it to pump a gas laser will be inefficient due to the narrow bandwidths of the absorption spectra of gasses.

Here is a link to an article entitled "Model of a nuclear — optically — pumped liquid laser" https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1070/QE2003v033n06ABEH002444 In this concept, neutrons from the nuclear reaction interact with a converter medium which produces the optical pump radiation. Perhaps the optical radiation produced by the nuclear lightbulb could be used to directly pump a suitable liquid lasant to bypass the need for a converter medium.

Perhaps a laser based on a dye in a liquid solvent could be used since there are dyes that can be optically pumped with UV radiation - See https://www.rp-photonics.com/dye_lasers.html which states: "Laser dyes for shorter emission wavelengths (for example, exalite, stilbene and coumarin) have to be pumped at shorter wavelengths – typically, with ultraviolet light...Some dye lasers can be pumped with flash lamps. This leads to longer pulses and a lower power conversion efficiency. However, pulsed pumping with flash lamps allows the excitation of large volumes and thus the generation of pulses with high energies...A frequently used kind of dye laser uses a thin dye jet [5] as the gain medium, so that the dye molecules are used only for a short time within the pump and laser beam and have a long time to recover before they are used again."

It might be possible to use a liquid cooled solid state laser as used in the high energy liquid laser area defense system (HELLADS) - See https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/high-energy-liquid-laser-programme/ . However, the suitability of the nuclear lightbulb's radiation to effectively pump a solid state lasant needs to be investigated. Perhaps the nuclear lightbulb's radiation can optically pump a semiconductor diode laser which can then optically pump the solid state laser. HELLADS' solid state laser is diode laser pumped.

All of the above is just speculation on my part. I do not know of any past or present research on weaponizing the nuclear lightbulb concept.
 
A nuclear lightbulb concept itself weaponizable as a beam thrower?
While interesting, your question is a bit off topic for this particular thread since I don't know of any SDI projects investigating the nuclear lightbulb concept as a weapon.

That being said, I can hypothesize two ways that the nuclear lightbulb might be used to pump a laser weapon:

1. Replace the hydrogen propellant with a suitable laser gas such as CO2 to drive a Gas Dynamic Laser (GDL) - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_dynamic_laser

2. Use the ultraviolet radiation produced by the nuclear lightbulb to drive an optically pumped laser - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_pumping#:~:text=Optical pumping is a process,as to achieve population inversion.

Given the high temperature environment in the nuclear lightbulb reactor, the optically pumped medium would likely need to be a gas, or maybe a liquid. I do not know the spectrum of the nuclear lightbulb's radiation, other than the references I've seen mentioning that it is concentrated in the UV. If the radiation is broadband, then using it to pump a gas laser will be inefficient due to the narrow bandwidths of the absorption spectra of gasses.

Here is a link to an article entitled "Model of a nuclear — optically — pumped liquid laser" https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1070/QE2003v033n06ABEH002444 In this concept, neutrons from the nuclear reaction interact with a converter medium which produces the optical pump radiation. Perhaps the optical radiation produced by the nuclear lightbulb could be used to directly pump a suitable liquid lasant to bypass the need for a converter medium.

Perhaps a laser based on a dye in a liquid solvent could be used since there are dyes that can be optically pumped with UV radiation - See https://www.rp-photonics.com/dye_lasers.html which states: "Laser dyes for shorter emission wavelengths (for example, exalite, stilbene and coumarin) have to be pumped at shorter wavelengths – typically, with ultraviolet light...Some dye lasers can be pumped with flash lamps. This leads to longer pulses and a lower power conversion efficiency. However, pulsed pumping with flash lamps allows the excitation of large volumes and thus the generation of pulses with high energies...A frequently used kind of dye laser uses a thin dye jet [5] as the gain medium, so that the dye molecules are used only for a short time within the pump and laser beam and have a long time to recover before they are used again."

It might be possible to use a liquid cooled solid state laser as used in the high energy liquid laser area defense system (HELLADS) - See https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/high-energy-liquid-laser-programme/ . However, the suitability of the nuclear lightbulb's radiation to effectively pump a solid state lasant needs to be investigated. Perhaps the nuclear lightbulb's radiation can optically pump a semiconductor diode laser which can then optically pump the solid state laser. HELLADS' solid state laser is diode laser pumped.

All of the above is just speculation on my part. I do not know of any past or present research on weaponizing the nuclear lightbulb concept.

 
A nuclear lightbulb concept itself weaponizable as a beam thrower?
While interesting, your question is a bit off topic for this particular thread since I don't know of any SDI projects investigating the nuclear lightbulb concept as a weapon.

That being said, I can hypothesize two ways that the nuclear lightbulb might be used to pump a laser weapon:

1. Replace the hydrogen propellant with a suitable laser gas such as CO2 to drive a Gas Dynamic Laser (GDL) - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_dynamic_laser

2. Use the ultraviolet radiation produced by the nuclear lightbulb to drive an optically pumped laser - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_pumping#:~:text=Optical pumping is a process,as to achieve population inversion.

Given the high temperature environment in the nuclear lightbulb reactor, the optically pumped medium would likely need to be a gas, or maybe a liquid. I do not know the spectrum of the nuclear lightbulb's radiation, other than the references I've seen mentioning that it is concentrated in the UV. If the radiation is broadband, then using it to pump a gas laser will be inefficient due to the narrow bandwidths of the absorption spectra of gasses.

Here is a link to an article entitled "Model of a nuclear — optically — pumped liquid laser" https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1070/QE2003v033n06ABEH002444 In this concept, neutrons from the nuclear reaction interact with a converter medium which produces the optical pump radiation. Perhaps the optical radiation produced by the nuclear lightbulb could be used to directly pump a suitable liquid lasant to bypass the need for a converter medium.

Perhaps a laser based on a dye in a liquid solvent could be used since there are dyes that can be optically pumped with UV radiation - See https://www.rp-photonics.com/dye_lasers.html which states: "Laser dyes for shorter emission wavelengths (for example, exalite, stilbene and coumarin) have to be pumped at shorter wavelengths – typically, with ultraviolet light...Some dye lasers can be pumped with flash lamps. This leads to longer pulses and a lower power conversion efficiency. However, pulsed pumping with flash lamps allows the excitation of large volumes and thus the generation of pulses with high energies...A frequently used kind of dye laser uses a thin dye jet [5] as the gain medium, so that the dye molecules are used only for a short time within the pump and laser beam and have a long time to recover before they are used again."

It might be possible to use a liquid cooled solid state laser as used in the high energy liquid laser area defense system (HELLADS) - See https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/high-energy-liquid-laser-programme/ . However, the suitability of the nuclear lightbulb's radiation to effectively pump a solid state lasant needs to be investigated. Perhaps the nuclear lightbulb's radiation can optically pump a semiconductor diode laser which can then optically pump the solid state laser. HELLADS' solid state laser is diode laser pumped.

All of the above is just speculation on my part. I do not know of any past or present research on weaponizing the nuclear lightbulb concept.

Great links - Thanks!

The first link has a great section on a conceptual design and analysis using the nuclear lightbulb's UV radiation to optically pump a XeF laser.

It also has a lot of great information on various nuclear bomb and nuclear reactor pumped laser concepts and research, as well as information on many types of beam weapons.

The second link has a lot of great information on nuclear powered propulsion for projectile weapons.

I had thought about using the nuclear lightbulb as a propulsion system for projectile weapons, but I did not include that in the response to the question since that question asked about using the nuclear lightbulb as a "beam thrower."
 
A nuclear lightbulb concept itself weaponizable as a beam thrower?
While interesting, your question is a bit off topic for this particular thread since I don't know of any SDI projects investigating the nuclear lightbulb concept as a weapon.

That being said, I can hypothesize two ways that the nuclear lightbulb might be used to pump a laser weapon:

1. Replace the hydrogen propellant with a suitable laser gas such as CO2 to drive a Gas Dynamic Laser (GDL) - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_dynamic_laser

2. Use the ultraviolet radiation produced by the nuclear lightbulb to drive an optically pumped laser - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_pumping#:~:text=Optical pumping is a process,as to achieve population inversion.

Given the high temperature environment in the nuclear lightbulb reactor, the optically pumped medium would likely need to be a gas, or maybe a liquid. I do not know the spectrum of the nuclear lightbulb's radiation, other than the references I've seen mentioning that it is concentrated in the UV. If the radiation is broadband, then using it to pump a gas laser will be inefficient due to the narrow bandwidths of the absorption spectra of gasses.

Here is a link to an article entitled "Model of a nuclear — optically — pumped liquid laser" https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1070/QE2003v033n06ABEH002444 In this concept, neutrons from the nuclear reaction interact with a converter medium which produces the optical pump radiation. Perhaps the optical radiation produced by the nuclear lightbulb could be used to directly pump a suitable liquid lasant to bypass the need for a converter medium.

Perhaps a laser based on a dye in a liquid solvent could be used since there are dyes that can be optically pumped with UV radiation - See https://www.rp-photonics.com/dye_lasers.html which states: "Laser dyes for shorter emission wavelengths (for example, exalite, stilbene and coumarin) have to be pumped at shorter wavelengths – typically, with ultraviolet light...Some dye lasers can be pumped with flash lamps. This leads to longer pulses and a lower power conversion efficiency. However, pulsed pumping with flash lamps allows the excitation of large volumes and thus the generation of pulses with high energies...A frequently used kind of dye laser uses a thin dye jet [5] as the gain medium, so that the dye molecules are used only for a short time within the pump and laser beam and have a long time to recover before they are used again."

It might be possible to use a liquid cooled solid state laser as used in the high energy liquid laser area defense system (HELLADS) - See https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/high-energy-liquid-laser-programme/ . However, the suitability of the nuclear lightbulb's radiation to effectively pump a solid state lasant needs to be investigated. Perhaps the nuclear lightbulb's radiation can optically pump a semiconductor diode laser which can then optically pump the solid state laser. HELLADS' solid state laser is diode laser pumped.

All of the above is just speculation on my part. I do not know of any past or present research on weaponizing the nuclear lightbulb concept.

Great links - Thanks!

The first link has a great section on a conceptual design and analysis using the nuclear lightbulb's UV radiation to optically pump a XeF laser.

It also has a lot of great information on various nuclear bomb and nuclear reactor pumped laser concepts and research, as well as information on many types of beam weapons.

The second link has a lot of great information on nuclear powered propulsion for projectile weapons.

I had thought about using the nuclear lightbulb as a propulsion system for projectile weapons, but I did not include that in the response to the question since that question asked about using the nuclear lightbulb as a "beam thrower."
If you check out the links at the bottom of the homepage there's lots about propulsion and other weapon concepts as well.

 
US National Security and Space Weapons from April 30, 2003.
Fw18Tp0WYAA8_QS


Source:
 
Boy howdy, wouldn't it be awfully nice to get an actual TRL on any and all of them thar that contraptions fer sure, pardner...
 
US National Security and Space Weapons from April 30, 2003.
Fw18Tp0WYAA8_QS


Source:
The architecture shown in the chart using the excimer lasers is an early concept drawing of a candidate architecture that was rejected by 1989.

According to https://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/gbl.htm "In 1989, SDIO eliminated the excimer laser as a candidate for the ground-based laser beam generator because of technical difficulties encountered during the White Sands Missile Range test, its low electrical efficiency, and the difficulty in propagating its short wavelength beam through the atmosphere. SDIO spent $169 million developing the excimer before it canceled the program...

After a formal a-year competition between teams composed of TRW/Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Boeing/Los Alamos National Laboratory, SDI0 eliminated the induction FEL technology during fiscal year 1989 and selected the radio frequency FEL technology as the beam generator for the ground-based laser. In 1990, SDIO awarded a contract to Boeing Aerospace/Los Alamos National Laboratory to build a multimegawatt radio frequency FEL at the Orogrande site at White Sands Missile Range...

In December 1990, SDI0 decided that the FEL research would be reoriented toward determining the feasibility of a space-based FEL weapon...

Program redirections by SDI and repeated budget cuts, beginning in fiscal year 1988, however, forced frequent modifications and downscaling in the project. The dedication ceremony took place in July 1990. These events culminated in the eventual demise of the project in January 1991, six month after the official dedication ceremony for the new Ground-Based FEL facility. The USASDC completed termination of the Ground-Based Laser Project Office on 1 August 1991.

With the agreement of the SDIO, the Average Power Laser Experiment, a restructured version of the GBFEL, was transferred to the Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) Directorate. Research continued on laser programs under the auspices of the High Energy Laser Technology Division. In conjunction with this effort, the division also worked to evaluate the component design option of the FEL to use in a possible space-based FEL."
 
List all weapons of SDI ? - Braduskill - X-Ray Laser - NPB Neutral Particle Beam - SBL Space Based Laser - HVG HyperVelocity rail Gun - GBL Ground Based Laser - SBKKV Space Based Kinetic Kill Vehicle - BP Brilliant Pebbles

Atmospheric lifting to create drag for the warheads and delivery vehicles where there was empty space. Some say HAARP is that weapon fielded.
 
This forum has discussed a lot of information on the strategic defense weapons being developed by the U.S. during the SDI era, but little has been said about what the Soviets were working on during that era.

I came across two web pages with information from sanitized and declassified documents about the CIA/American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Conference on Soviet Threat Technology, Tuesday, 8 April 1986 at the CIA Headquarters Auditorium 1:


and https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP88G01117R001004020002-2.pdf

The first link has run together text and the second link is a PDF with the same information, but as an image rather than as searchable text.

Here is an excerpt about Soviet developments in Directed Energy Weapons:

"VI. Directed-Energy and Hypervelocity Kinetic-Energy Weapons

Directed-energy and kinetic-energy weapons potentially could be developed for several strategic weapons applications--antisatellite (ASAT), air defense, battlefield use, and, in the longer term, ballistic missile defense (BMD).

There is strong evidence of Soviet efforts to develop high-energy laser weapons, and these efforts have been taking place, in some cases, since the 1960s:

--We estimate a laser weapon program of the magnitude of the Soviet effort would cost roughly $1 billion per year if carried out in the United States.

--Two facilities at the Saryshagan test range are assessed to have high-energy lasers with the potential to function as ASAT weapons.

--We are concerned about a large Soviet program to develop ground-based laser weapons for terminal defense against reentry vehicles. There are major uncertainties, however, concerning the feasibility and practicality of using ground-based lasers for BMD. We expect the Soviets to test the feasibility of such a system during the 1980s, probably using one of the high-energy laser facilities at Saryshagan. An operational system could not be deployed until many years later, probably not until after the year 2000.

--The Soviets appear to be developing two high-energy laser weapons with potential strategic air defense applications--ground-based and naval point defense.

--The Soviets are continuing to develop an airborne laser.

--Soviet research includes a project to develop high-energy laser weapons for use in space. A prototype high-energy, space-based laser ASAT weapon could be tested in low orbit in the early 1990s. Even if testing were successful, such a system probably could not be operational before the mid-1990s.

The Soviets are also conducting research under military sponsorship for the purpose of acquiring the ability to develop particle beam weapons (PBWs). We believe the Soviets will eventually attempt to build a space-based PBW, but the technical requirements are so severe that we estimate there is a low probability they will test a prototype before the year 2000.

The Soviets are strong in the technologies appropriate for radiofrequency (RF) weapons, which could be used to interfere with or destroy components of missiles or satellites, and we judge they are probably capable of developing a prototype RF weapon system.

We are concerned that Soviet directed-energy programs may have proceeded to the point where they could construct operational ground-based ASAT weapons."
 
This forum has discussed a lot of information on the strategic defense weapons being developed by the U.S. during the SDI era, but little has been said about what the Soviets were working on during that era.

I came across two web pages with information from sanitized and declassified documents about the CIA/American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Conference on Soviet Threat Technology, Tuesday, 8 April 1986 at the CIA Headquarters Auditorium 1:


and https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP88G01117R001004020002-2.pdf

The first link has run together text and the second link is a PDF with the same information, but as an image rather than as searchable text.

Here is an excerpt about Soviet developments in Directed Energy Weapons:

"VI. Directed-Energy and Hypervelocity Kinetic-Energy Weapons

Directed-energy and kinetic-energy weapons potentially could be developed for several strategic weapons applications--antisatellite (ASAT), air defense, battlefield use, and, in the longer term, ballistic missile defense (BMD).

There is strong evidence of Soviet efforts to develop high-energy laser weapons, and these efforts have been taking place, in some cases, since the 1960s:

--We estimate a laser weapon program of the magnitude of the Soviet effort would cost roughly $1 billion per year if carried out in the United States.

--Two facilities at the Saryshagan test range are assessed to have high-energy lasers with the potential to function as ASAT weapons.

--We are concerned about a large Soviet program to develop ground-based laser weapons for terminal defense against reentry vehicles. There are major uncertainties, however, concerning the feasibility and practicality of using ground-based lasers for BMD. We expect the Soviets to test the feasibility of such a system during the 1980s, probably using one of the high-energy laser facilities at Saryshagan. An operational system could not be deployed until many years later, probably not until after the year 2000.

--The Soviets appear to be developing two high-energy laser weapons with potential strategic air defense applications--ground-based and naval point defense.

--The Soviets are continuing to develop an airborne laser.

--Soviet research includes a project to develop high-energy laser weapons for use in space. A prototype high-energy, space-based laser ASAT weapon could be tested in low orbit in the early 1990s. Even if testing were successful, such a system probably could not be operational before the mid-1990s.

The Soviets are also conducting research under military sponsorship for the purpose of acquiring the ability to develop particle beam weapons (PBWs). We believe the Soviets will eventually attempt to build a space-based PBW, but the technical requirements are so severe that we estimate there is a low probability they will test a prototype before the year 2000.

The Soviets are strong in the technologies appropriate for radiofrequency (RF) weapons, which could be used to interfere with or destroy components of missiles or satellites, and we judge they are probably capable of developing a prototype RF weapon system.

We are concerned that Soviet directed-energy programs may have proceeded to the point where they could construct operational ground-based ASAT weapons."
They were working on particle beam weapons in the 70s. More than must a paper exercise.
 
This forum has discussed a lot of information on the strategic defense weapons being developed by the U.S. during the SDI era, but little has been said about what the Soviets were working on during that era.

I came across two web pages with information from sanitized and declassified documents about the CIA/American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Conference on Soviet Threat Technology, Tuesday, 8 April 1986 at the CIA Headquarters Auditorium 1:


and https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP88G01117R001004020002-2.pdf

The first link has run together text and the second link is a PDF with the same information, but as an image rather than as searchable text.

Here is an excerpt about Soviet developments in Directed Energy Weapons:

"VI. Directed-Energy and Hypervelocity Kinetic-Energy Weapons

Directed-energy and kinetic-energy weapons potentially could be developed for several strategic weapons applications--antisatellite (ASAT), air defense, battlefield use, and, in the longer term, ballistic missile defense (BMD).

There is strong evidence of Soviet efforts to develop high-energy laser weapons, and these efforts have been taking place, in some cases, since the 1960s:

--We estimate a laser weapon program of the magnitude of the Soviet effort would cost roughly $1 billion per year if carried out in the United States.

--Two facilities at the Saryshagan test range are assessed to have high-energy lasers with the potential to function as ASAT weapons.

--We are concerned about a large Soviet program to develop ground-based laser weapons for terminal defense against reentry vehicles. There are major uncertainties, however, concerning the feasibility and practicality of using ground-based lasers for BMD. We expect the Soviets to test the feasibility of such a system during the 1980s, probably using one of the high-energy laser facilities at Saryshagan. An operational system could not be deployed until many years later, probably not until after the year 2000.

--The Soviets appear to be developing two high-energy laser weapons with potential strategic air defense applications--ground-based and naval point defense.

--The Soviets are continuing to develop an airborne laser.

--Soviet research includes a project to develop high-energy laser weapons for use in space. A prototype high-energy, space-based laser ASAT weapon could be tested in low orbit in the early 1990s. Even if testing were successful, such a system probably could not be operational before the mid-1990s.

The Soviets are also conducting research under military sponsorship for the purpose of acquiring the ability to develop particle beam weapons (PBWs). We believe the Soviets will eventually attempt to build a space-based PBW, but the technical requirements are so severe that we estimate there is a low probability they will test a prototype before the year 2000.

The Soviets are strong in the technologies appropriate for radiofrequency (RF) weapons, which could be used to interfere with or destroy components of missiles or satellites, and we judge they are probably capable of developing a prototype RF weapon system.

We are concerned that Soviet directed-energy programs may have proceeded to the point where they could construct operational ground-based ASAT weapons."
They were working on particle beam weapons in the 70s. More than must a paper exercise.
True, but I don't think the write-up implies that it was just a paper exercise. Where it says "we estimate there is a low probability they will test a prototype before the year 2000" they were referring specifically to a space-based prototype tested in space, not to ground-based laboratory prototypes which the Soviets already had developed.
 
Now of all the SDI assets—-that probably has the best side utility.

Shoot a cubesat in place of an interceptor maybe?
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom