KMW Artillery Gun Module (AGM)

Voltzz

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
10 April 2021
Messages
398
Reaction score
1,491
There is already a bunch of stuff on the RCH155 (AGM on Boxer) in the Boxer thread but no place for the other AGM variants/features.
So lets start with the two main other platforms for AGM that KMW has shown:
AGM on Iveco Trakker
DONAR - AGM on ASCOD
AGM on Piranha for a Swiss requirement
 

Attachments

  • AGMiveco1.JPG
    AGMiveco1.JPG
    78.1 KB · Views: 77
  • AGMiveco2.JPG
    AGMiveco2.JPG
    153.3 KB · Views: 51
  • AGMiveco3.JPG
    AGMiveco3.JPG
    142.6 KB · Views: 45
  • DONAR1.jpg
    DONAR1.jpg
    170.7 KB · Views: 42
  • DONAR2.jpg
    DONAR2.jpg
    101.6 KB · Views: 43
  • DONAR3.jpg
    DONAR3.jpg
    202.1 KB · Views: 45
  • DONAR4.jpg
    DONAR4.jpg
    139.5 KB · Views: 53
  • AGMpiranha.jpg
    AGMpiranha.jpg
    339.4 KB · Views: 65
Last edited:
KMW Smart Camp Defence:
Our Smart Camp Defense® solution is a modular, upgradable, and efficient system for the protection of field camps against attacks. The version described here mainly integrates our own systems, to which other weapons and sensor systems must be added in certain cases. The core element of the Smart Camp Defense solution is our Artillery Gun Module (AGM) (or the PzH2000), which, depending on the size and specific needs of the camp concerned, can be deployed in conjunction with four to six weapon systems for comprehensive protection of the field camp and the units operating outside of it. We are also developing a highly effective air defense system for field camps that will allow for detection of mortar, rockets and the like while in flight, generation of an alarm for field camp personnel, destruction of the projectile, and neutralization of enemy forces via a counter battery. This system will be based on PzH2000 or AGM fire power together with the effect of a 155 mm explosive projectile. We are also developing a firing control solution for this system.
Source
TLDR its integrated C-RAM and counter battery fire based on the AGM or PzH2000
It was supposed to use existing L15A1 high-explosive-fragmentation shells with a timed fuse and was tested at least against mortars with some success. (Source)
 

Attachments

  • SCD1.jpg
    SCD1.jpg
    170.4 KB · Views: 64
  • AGMnaval+SCD.JPG
    AGMnaval+SCD.JPG
    134.5 KB · Views: 60
  • SCDtest.JPG
    SCDtest.JPG
    294.6 KB · Views: 62
  • DonarCampDefence.jpg
    DonarCampDefence.jpg
    29.7 KB · Views: 2
Last edited:
Navalized AGM:
German trials with mounting a PzH2000 turret on a Frigate (MONARC) showed 2 major problems. The recoil necessitated a complicated flexible mounting and the turret had problems with corrosion, being not designed for the challenging naval environment. The AGM was supposed to address both of these problems.
There is however very little information on it beyond a few KMW ads.
 

Attachments

  • MONARC2.jpg
    MONARC2.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 59
  • MONARC1.jpg
    MONARC1.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 56
  • AGMnaval1.JPG
    AGMnaval1.JPG
    92.6 KB · Views: 65
  • AGMvariants1.JPG
    AGMvariants1.JPG
    140.5 KB · Views: 72
  • AGMvariants2.JPG
    AGMvariants2.JPG
    81.8 KB · Views: 82
KMW Smart Camp Defence:

Source
TLDR its integrated C-RAM and counter battery fire based on the AGM or PzH2000
It was supposed to use existing L15A1 high-explosive-fragmentation shells with a timed fuse and was tested at least against mortars with some success. (Source)

It's not clear to me whether the impact here actually inactivated the mortar shell, or just damaged and deflected it. That's an important failure mode where a "successful" intercept just drops the incoming round into the area outside the camp itself, which may be full of innocent civilians. While also scattering fragmentation in the area as well. Hopefully, the intercept would be high enough that the frag can lose speed and fall harmlessly.
 
It's not clear to me whether the impact here actually inactivated the mortar shell, or just damaged and deflected it. That's an important failure mode where a "successful" intercept just drops the incoming round into the area outside the camp itself, which may be full of innocent civilians. While also scattering fragmentation in the area as well. Hopefully, the intercept would be high enough that the frag can lose speed and fall harmlessly.
Translation of the KMW article/ad that is the source of the test image:
Further development of artillery Smart Camp Defense (SCD)
With Smart Camp Defense, Krauss-Maffei Wegmann (KMW) is developing an effective and modular system for active defense against rocket, artillery and mortar and mortar threats (RAM).
The basic idea behind the company's development was to use systems or components already in use or existing systems or components to counter threats. The system will be modular and adaptable to adaptable to other systems.
The smallest operational equivalent for this system consists of of the following components:
- 2 PzH 2000 or the KMW-developed artillery AGM gun module.
- tracking radar
- Fire control center/fire control software
- Remotely triggered fuze
- 155mm HE projectiles
The principle operation of the system is described described below:
The weapon system is connected via a fire control center to a tracking radar, which receives target data from a suitable search radar.
The threat is focused and tracked. Location and speed data are constantly transmitted to the fire control center.
The fire control software developed by KMW calculates a prediction of the trajectory and an optimal intercept point. The
system continuously aims at the target with the appropriate lead. At the optimum moment, the shot is triggered automatically.
During the combat sequence, the follow-up radar can track both its own projectile and the attacking RAM target. This means that the fire control computer automatically knows the two trajectories which then calculates the most favorable ignition timing of the remotely triggered fuze.
The calculation also takes into account the angle of encounter at which the two projectiles approach each other.
When the fuze is triggered, the artillery projectile detonates and the high-energy fragments created by the detonation destroy the RAM threat.
The ideal interception point is chosen so that collateral damage from falling fragments is minimized. If the expected point of impact of the enemy projectile is not a threat, the defensive action is not initiated in the first place.
The trajectory calculation can be used to determine the enemy's position from which the enemy projectile was fired. A direct counter fire against this position is possible and subsequent attacks are prevented.
The engagement distance for RAM targets is between one and three kilometers. The engagement of other targets, such as drones or helicopters, is possible, as long as they are on a predictable flight path.
Tests conducted as part of an R&T project at Wehrtechnische Dienststelle (WTD) 91 in Meppen have already demonstrated the effectiveness of the system. In encounter firings with 155mm projectiles against inert 120mm mortar rounds, devastating hits were achieved. A high-speed camera was used to record the encounter situation of the projectiles in the air.
Shrapnel impacting the RAM target produced a flash of light in the film recording, which can be seen in the figure. One hit mortar round could be recovered because of the boggy soil in the Emsland. The 120mm mortar round shows a large hull penetration and a torn tail unit.
As mentioned at the beginning, KMW uses mostly existing components in the supply chain for camp protection with artillery. The only adjustments to be made to the PzH 2000 are to the weapon alignment system and the control software. The remotely triggered fuze is a DM74 with modified electronics. All 155 mm explosive rounds, such as the L15A1, can be used as projectiles. For the search radar, there are commercially available solutions that can also detect missiles at low altitudes.
As a follow-up radar, a high-resolution device is used, which among other things is used as a measuring radar on the WTD91. The networking of these systems via the fire control center guarantees fully automated tracking and engagement of approaching RAM threats in a matter of seconds.
User countries of the PzH 2000 can use existing systems for field camp/object protection. The PzH 2000's multi-role capability allows the armed forces of these countries to use this effective system virtually unchanged, drawing on the weapon system's existing logistics chain. Alternatively, the system can be operated with the AGM (artillery gun module). The fully automatic AGM can be deployed unmanned and remotely operated (24 hours a day/7 days a week) with the same precision and approximately the same rate of fire as the PzH 2000.
Smart Camp Defense owes its ability to effectively counter the threat to the combination of reaction speed, precision and firepower of the PzH 2000 or the unmanned artillery gun module.
Currently, Smart Camp Defense is under in-house development. Shooting tests on the grounds of WTD 91 in Meppen and in Putlos were promising. Shooting using high-explosive RAM projectiles and high-explosive HE artillery projectiles is planned. KMW is pursuing the concept of open architecture in the software in order to be able to connect further sensors and effectors and to respond flexibly to the requirements and wishes of the users.
The testing was done against inert 120mm mortar rounds. I would expect that the hull penetration would cause a normal projectile to ignite, although that might depend on the insensitivity of the round.
Falling fragment could be an issue, and the targeting system can only minimize the impact of it if there is enough slack in the interception timing/procedure, but this is a problem that all c-ram systems face.
 
Falling fragment could be an issue, and the targeting system can only minimize the impact of it if there is enough slack in the interception timing/procedure, but this is a problem that all c-ram systems face.

That's certainly true. A 155mm shell in general might be expected to make bigger frags than, say, 20mm self-destructing rounds, but there are limits to how much you can minimize this.
 
That's certainly true. A 155mm shell in general might be expected to make bigger frags than, say, 20mm self-destructing rounds, but there are limits to how much you can minimize this.
If they're intercepting mortars at horizontal ranges of 1-3km, the shell splinters will be at least 1km up. That's well outside the danger area for 155mm (iirc about 150m), so the falling fragments should be slowed as much as possible.

And man, I feel sorry for whatever helicopter catches a 155mm frag round!
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom