Reply to thread

Most sources seem to regard the compilations on oryxspioenkop.com as being both more in depth and comprehensive than anything provided by officialdom (of any stripe).


-- https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2022/08/the-case-for-cautious-optimism-in-ukraine.html

("This commentary originally appeared on Foreign Policy on August 9, 2022.")


So, are you saying that figures published on oryxspioenkop.com need to be taken within the context of the qualifiers in their introductions? Or are you claiming to have insights or examples to share of egregious errors in volume by Oryx?


It would be nice to know for sure. If the former, too true (and Oryx contributors would likely concur). If the latter, let's see those examples. AFAIK, Oryx is largely a volunteer effort and a highly taxing one at that. If that overall effort is being disparaged for potential errors or incompleteness already covered by Oryx section intros, that would seem to be in poor form.


Back
Top Bottom