can u give sources?Warthunder notwithstanding, Walleye wasn't really used against moving targets. It needed a stable, high-contrast scene to lock on reliably, and small moving targets were far from ideal.
can u give sources?Warthunder notwithstanding, Walleye wasn't really used against moving targets. It needed a stable, high-contrast scene to lock on reliably, and small moving targets were far from ideal.
Thank you. Do you have more sources?can u give sources?Warthunder notwithstanding, Walleye wasn't really used against moving targets. It needed a stable, high-contrast scene to lock on reliably, and small moving targets were far from ideal.
One example:
THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRECISION GUIDE BOMBS: THE LONG ROAD TO DESERT STORM AND BEYOND
You'll note that the typical targets for Walleye were bridges, barracks, and bunkers. Other sources also mention power plants and other fixed targets. No account I can find mentions Walleye engaging moving targets on land. (Paveway LGBs were used on moving targets.)
The one obvious exception is that Walleye was also intended to target ships at sea, which are moving, but also usually offer good contrast and not much clutter to deal with.
Ok. If u have more sources about walleye and other bombs like gbu-8,gbu-15 without thermal seeker couldnt track moving targets please post here sources etc..Sorry, that's the limit of the research I'm doing. And I'm not aare of Kab-500Kr at all -- just wanted to correct the misconception about Walleye.
can u give me sources?No, 500Kr (or any TV-guided KAB) can't track moving target, since it uses whole picture correlation.
thanks, and what about walleye, gbu15?
thanks, and what about walleye, gbu15?
Let's not be too harsh) If everyone on this forum contributed as much as asked, we would have 20% of current population at best.Dude, you've made 12 posts here and it's all "gimme, gimme, gimme.".
You need to contribute, not just demand that other people answer your questions (especially ones that edge into really, unusually, specific technical data).
Let's not be too harsh) If everyone on this forum contributed as much as asked, we would have 20% of current population at best.Dude, you've made 12 posts here and it's all "gimme, gimme, gimme.".
You need to contribute, not just demand that other people answer your questions (especially ones that edge into really, unusually, specific technical data).