Attachments

  • junkers_ju_288_v5-64010.jpg
    junkers_ju_288_v5-64010.jpg
    112.5 KB · Views: 374
  • ZZ_009-1_Ju288_V5_mit_Jumo222AB_Mai1941.jpg
    ZZ_009-1_Ju288_V5_mit_Jumo222AB_Mai1941.jpg
    53.9 KB · Views: 288
  • 288B-DSR.jpg
    288B-DSR.jpg
    65.5 KB · Views: 290
  • junkers_ju_288-10big.jpg
    junkers_ju_288-10big.jpg
    82.4 KB · Views: 310
  • gerat-104-2.jpg
    gerat-104-2.jpg
    25.9 KB · Views: 798
  • ju288c.jpg
    ju288c.jpg
    51.3 KB · Views: 804
  • Ju288C with DB610 engine.jpg
    Ju288C with DB610 engine.jpg
    64.5 KB · Views: 842
  • junkers-ju-288.png
    junkers-ju-288.png
    32.2 KB · Views: 868
Last edited:
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • Ju288 cabin.jpg
    Ju288 cabin.jpg
    600.6 KB · Views: 1,545
  • ytjytjytjjyt.jpg
    ytjytjytjjyt.jpg
    54.9 KB · Views: 1,549
  • reargerge.jpg
    reargerge.jpg
    89.9 KB · Views: 1,584
Hi! Jumo 222 engine.

"The Jumo 222 A/B-2 was first run in mid-1941 and was taken briefly to 3,000 hp (2,237 kW) by overboosting to 11.5 psi (.79 bar) in October 1941. However, the increased bore size created a harmonic resonance within the engine. With three Ju 52s serving as Jumo 222 test beds and a number of other engines on test stands, the entire project began to encounter significant issues. Connecting rod bearings were still a problem as was corrosion of the engine’s internal components. Despite the issues, the Jumo 222A/B-1-powered Ju 288 V5 made its maiden flight on 8 October 1941. Brandner had managed to talk his way onto the aircraft for the flight, which was completed without issue. For the Ju 288, the Jumo 222 turned a four-blade Junkers VS 7 propeller that was a 13 ft 1 in (4.0 m) in diameter. An annular radiator was positioned in the cowling, and experiments were conducted on Ju 288 V5 using a ducted spinner to deliver cooling air to the radiator.

As the manufacturing plant in Austria neared completion in late October 1941, it was clear that the Jumo 222 was not going to be ready for production. A decision was made to manufacture the Daimler-Benz DB 603 at the plant with production starting in March 1942. On 24 December 1941, the RLM cancelled the Jumo 222 for the Ju 288. The decision was based on the engine’s then-current takeoff rating of only 2,000 hp (1,491 kW), its ongoing issues, and its operational readiness not being sufficient for the Ju 288’s planned production schedule. The Ju 288 would be powered by DB 610 (two coupled DB 605s) engines, and Junkers would focus on developing the Jumo 213 inverted V-12. Work on the Jumo 222 would continue, but the engine was no longer a priority. Brandner stated that, at the time, various Jumo 222 engines had completed 20 100-hour test runs, and many at Junkers felt that the engine was basically ready for production. However, further issues with the connecting rod bearings caused a developmental delay that extended from January to March 1942."

 

Attachments

  • u83ASko.jpeg
    u83ASko.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 75
  • V5 Jumo222.jpg
    V5 Jumo222.jpg
    384.2 KB · Views: 76
  • v5 and v8.jpg
    v5 and v8.jpg
    118.8 KB · Views: 78
  • Ju-288 mockup.jpg
    Ju-288 mockup.jpg
    725.2 KB · Views: 69
  • V9 JUMO222.jpg
    V9 JUMO222.jpg
    72.3 KB · Views: 67
  • v14 three side view.jpg
    v14 three side view.jpg
    105.8 KB · Views: 75
  • AoDFNUT.jpeg
    AoDFNUT.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 72
  • Jumo222.jpg
    Jumo222.jpg
    101 KB · Views: 37
Last edited:
Hi! DB606 and DB610.

"The DB 606 engine and its installation in the He 177 proved to be disastrous. As doppelmotor production picked up, vibration issues were discovered with the two engine sections, and the combining gear required much more development than had been anticipated. There were also issues with failures of the engine couplings. A major DB 606 issue was with its oil circulation at high altitudes. The oil would foam, leading to inadequate lubrication and the subsequent failure of bearings and seizing of pistons. Some of these failures would be catastrophic, with parts (connecting rods) breaking through the crankcase.

But it was the engine installation that caused the biggest issues. The annular radiators provided inadequate cooling, resulting in the engines running hot. The exhaust between the two inner cylinder banks ran so hot that any fuel or oil that dripped down from leaking fittings or during a catastrophic engine failure was ignited. Weeping fittings and seeping seals (partly caused by material shortages and substitutions during the war) were a constant issue, as the leaked fluid would pool and eventually be ignited by the hot exhausts’ radiant heat. Through lack of a firewall, fires in the engine nacelle would spread to the main gear and ignite any leaking hydraulic fluid. In addition, the hot exhaust being expelled just forward of the extended main gear was enough to ignite any hydraulic oil that had leaked.


Any fire in the wing spread quickly and spelled disaster for the aircraft and its crew. With the crew siting well forward of the engines, fires often went unnoticed until severe damage had occurred. Despite the best efforts of maintenance crews, the DB 606 engines needed constant attention and proved very difficult to service. Engine fires occurred with such regularity that crews referred to the He 177 as the Luftwaffenfeuerzeug, or Luftwaffe’s cigarette lighter. To resolve the engine issues, suggestions were made to extend the engine nacelle, install a firewall, reroute lines to prevent the pooling of fluids under the engine, and redesign the exhaust system. Such changes were ignored at first because they would delay He 177 production, which had already been rushed. However, the aircraft was also experiencing a number of structural issues unrelated to the engines that made modifications necessary."
 
Last edited:
"The DB 610 installation on the He 177 A-3 was extended 200 mm (7.9 in) forward, and a firewall was incorporated behind the engine. On 22 March 1943, the DB 610 made its first flight in an He 177 (V19, VF+QA). Although reliability had been improved, engine fires still occurred, and the DB 610 suffered from the same engine coupling failures that had been experienced with the DB 606. In May 1942, Hermann Göring, commander of the Luftwaffe, made the following comment in reference to the He 177 and DB 606: “I have never been so furious as when I saw this engine. …Nobody mentioned this hocus-pocus with two welded-together engines to me at all.” By early 1944, plans were in motion to build He 177 with four separate engines, a suggestion that Heinkel had discussed back in late 1938 and proposed in mid-1939. Further production and development of the He 177 was abandoned on 1 July 1944. Once the Allies had landed on the continent, German aircraft production was focused on defensive fighters and attackers.

The Daimler-Benz doppelmotoren were also installed in the Junkers Ju 288 bomber. As issues with its intended 24-cylinder Junkers Jumo 222 inline radial engine created a short supply, the DB 606 was substituted in Ju 288 prototypes. A DB 606 engine was installed on each wing in a form-fitting nacelle with an annular radiator at its front. Like with the He 177, the extension shaft connected the engine to the propeller. The DB 606-powered Ju 288 V11 made its first flight in July 1942. Three additional Ju 288s were powered by DB 606 engines. A switch to the DB 610 was made for the Ju 288 V103, which was first flown in the spring of 1943. Five additional Ju 288s were powered with DB 610 engines. The doppelmotor installation in the Ju 288 did not result in the frequent engine fires experienced with the He 177. The DB 610 was planned for later Ju 288 C and D variants, but the aircraft were cancelled."
 
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • V11 DB606.jpg
    V11 DB606.jpg
    102.6 KB · Views: 57
  • v11.jpg
    v11.jpg
    232.1 KB · Views: 57
  • V11-3.jpg
    V11-3.jpg
    687.8 KB · Views: 51
  • V14 DB606.jpg
    V14 DB606.jpg
    66.1 KB · Views: 60
  • v14 three side view.jpg
    v14 three side view.jpg
    105.8 KB · Views: 69
  • DB610.jpeg
    DB610.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 44
Hi! The Planned Ju 288-Series Versions.
V6 , V7, V8, and V12 were Version A.
V10, V11, V12,V13 and V14 were Version B.
V101, V102, V103 and V104 were Version C.
 

Attachments

  • The Planned Ju 288 Series Versions.jpg
    The Planned Ju 288 Series Versions.jpg
    695.9 KB · Views: 58
Last edited:
Hi! Version A. (Slim cabin)
(V6 , V7, V8, and V12)
V5 was not Version A.
 

Attachments

  • luftwaffe_junkers_ju288a_v5_v8.jpg
    luftwaffe_junkers_ju288a_v5_v8.jpg
    78.2 KB · Views: 53
  • v5 and v8.jpg
    v5 and v8.jpg
    118.8 KB · Views: 53
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (14)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (14)-960.jpg
    101.2 KB · Views: 55
  • A-1 and A-2.jpg
    A-1 and A-2.jpg
    121.8 KB · Views: 58
  • Junkers-Ju-288-Der-Ungl-cksbomber-02-08.jpg
    Junkers-Ju-288-Der-Ungl-cksbomber-02-08.jpg
    199.5 KB · Views: 64
  • Version A.jpg
    Version A.jpg
    71.4 KB · Views: 57
Last edited:
Hi! Early design for Version B. (Large bubble cabin)
 

Attachments

  • Cross-sectional details of the Ju288B early plan with Jumo 222.jpg
    Cross-sectional details of the Ju288B early plan with Jumo 222.jpg
    121 KB · Views: 59
  • early Ju288B plan.jpg
    early Ju288B plan.jpg
    82.4 KB · Views: 63
  • The top side view shows early Ju 288B design.jpg
    The top side view shows early Ju 288B design.jpg
    83.6 KB · Views: 58
Hi! Version B. (Please take care bubble shape cabin, and cabin side window shape.)
(V10, V11, V12,V13 and V14 )
 

Attachments

  • B-1.jpg
    B-1.jpg
    89.7 KB · Views: 55
  • V9 JUMO222.jpg
    V9 JUMO222.jpg
    72.3 KB · Views: 50
  • V11 DB606.jpg
    V11 DB606.jpg
    102.6 KB · Views: 46
  • v11.jpg
    v11.jpg
    232.1 KB · Views: 43
  • V14 DB606.jpg
    V14 DB606.jpg
    66.1 KB · Views: 48
  • v14 three side view.jpg
    v14 three side view.jpg
    105.8 KB · Views: 52
  • middle three side view shows Ju 288B.jpg
    middle three side view shows Ju 288B.jpg
    83.6 KB · Views: 60
Last edited:
Hi! Version C.
(Version C featured vertical stabilizers that tilts slightly inward.)
(V101, V102, V103 and V104)
 

Attachments

  • V103.jpg
    V103.jpg
    246.5 KB · Views: 57
  • V103 PIC3.jpg
    V103 PIC3.jpg
    333.3 KB · Views: 57
  • V103 PIC2.jpg
    V103 PIC2.jpg
    133 KB · Views: 50
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (31)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (31)-960.jpg
    80.1 KB · Views: 55
  • 00097213-z.jpg
    00097213-z.jpg
    87.7 KB · Views: 58
  • C-2.jpg
    C-2.jpg
    53.9 KB · Views: 61
  • bottom three side view shows Ju 288C.jpg
    bottom three side view shows Ju 288C.jpg
    83.6 KB · Views: 72
Last edited:

Attachments

  • 2de616aa-eed7-413a-981f-c7fe5cc96b77.jpg
    2de616aa-eed7-413a-981f-c7fe5cc96b77.jpg
    81.2 KB · Views: 54
  • 58f64676-0e33-4e97-943e-1aaa2d171023.jpg
    58f64676-0e33-4e97-943e-1aaa2d171023.jpg
    274.6 KB · Views: 53
  • eb798b79-70a0-42e6-b545-4bc45b4bfe3c.jpg
    eb798b79-70a0-42e6-b545-4bc45b4bfe3c.jpg
    565.9 KB · Views: 52
  • fbfecb17-de42-4247-9f99-1e8ddc6df301.jpg
    fbfecb17-de42-4247-9f99-1e8ddc6df301.jpg
    563.2 KB · Views: 49
  • 2b005b68-14ee-45d9-9ec5-3b453f189431.jpg
    2b005b68-14ee-45d9-9ec5-3b453f189431.jpg
    423.5 KB · Views: 51
Last edited:


The Junkers version with a gun inside the company bore the unofficial designation Ju 288G √ from "G" - "gerät", although it was never built "in iron". In all likelihood, the projects of the Ju 288G carrier and the Sondergerät SG 104 Münchhausen developments moved in parallel courses, since when the SG 104 project was finally buried in mid-1941, the development of the Ju 288G carrier continued for some time. And at a later stage, as an armament, it was considered another, more modest in size, sample of the work of the Rheinmetall company - a 280-mm recoilless gun Düsenkanone 280 or otherwise Düka 280.

The Junkers Ju 288 "Sonderausführung" (Special Modification) was a paper project about mounting an 280 mm recoilless rifle ("Düsenkanone") onto the Ju 288 platform. After the failure of the original Ju 288G (with 355mm single-shot recoilless rifle), the project was abandoned as the Luftwaffe already have better, more advanced arsenal.
 

Attachments

  • 6F5mFZ-UserView-0.jpg
    6F5mFZ-UserView-0.jpg
    192.7 KB · Views: 48
  • Ju 288G.jpg
    Ju 288G.jpg
    280.5 KB · Views: 61
Last edited:
Hi!
The second prototype of the Junkers Ju-88 (complete with civil registration) seen after a conversion to test the aerodynamics of the proposed Junkers Ju-288 cockpit area.
 

Attachments

  • The second prototype of the Junkers Ju-88 (complete with civil registration) seen after a conv...jpg
    The second prototype of the Junkers Ju-88 (complete with civil registration) seen after a conv...jpg
    327.1 KB · Views: 62
In June 1936, the German Ministry of Aviation (RML) issued a specification for a large aircraft capable of dive bombing while being a heavy bomber in the A bomber program, and the Heinkel He 177 was to be used for this purpose. In addition, in July 1939, the B bomber project was designed to be a medium-sized bomber capable of bombing the British mainland, with a maximum speed of 600 km/h and a bomb load of 4,000 kg. It required the installation of a pressurized cabin for high-altitude flight and a turret that could be controlled remotely from the pressurized chamber.

The Junkers Ju 288 bomber was developed for the B bomber program. This aircraft extended the fuselage of the mass-produced Junkers Ju 88 and extended the main wings to improve performance at high altitudes. The Junkers Ju 288 bomber was planned to be equipped with a pressurized cockpit for altitude flight, but due to the delay in its practical use, it could not be equipped.
 
RECOILLESS​



The RCL guns developed during the First World War were based on the physical principle of the counter-shot, an object with the same mass as the projectile that was thrown backwards during firing to counteract the recoil.

During the 1930s, Rheinmetall-Borsig engineers perfected the system by replacing the counter-shot with a cartridge case that weighed the same as the shell.

In 1937 the firm Krupp developed a more effective system by replacing the counter-shot with a rocket nozzle designed to expel gases in the opposite direction of the projectile.

The mass of gas multiplied by its speed was the same as the mass of the Shell multiplied by its speed, then the two effects balanced each other.

In 1941, the Krupp Düsenkanone (jet cannon) 7.5 Leicht Geschütz 40 was used by paratroopers in the airborne attack on Crete and by Alpenjägern in the Carpatian mountains.

The anti-tank recoilless cannon was found to be useful but in 1944 the Heereswaffenamt decided to halt production. By the time gun propellants were in very short supply and the recoilless cannon used up to five times the amount of propellant needed by conventional artillery.

On the contrary, the Luftwaffe showed great interest in the new technology that

would allow large-caliber guns to be installed in aircraft without suffering structural damage caused by the recoil.

Early in 1944, static tests were conducted with a Rheinmetall-Borsig Düka 75 mounted beneath a Messerschmitt Bf 110 but the fuselage of the plane was badly damaged by the rear blast and the development of a viable air-to-air version was transferred to the Skoda firm.

The Czech engineers decided to replace the original jet nozzle with two convergent-divergent Laval nozzles extended at the rear by two jet pipes angled 30-degrees.

In February 1944 designer Alexander Lippisch proposed using the new version of the Düka 75 as the main armament of the Delta VI jet plane project.

Düka 75 technical data

Caliber: 75-mm (6.5 kg) single-shot recoilless weapon.

Lenght: 4.85 m.

Muzzle velocity: 540 m/sec.

Weight: 650 kg.



The Düka 88 (with two exhaust nozzles inclined at 51-degrees) was an improved version of the Düka 75 developed at Rheinmetall-Borsig by a team headed by Dipl.-Ing. A. Kleinschmidt.

The type was mounted under the belly of the Junkers Ju 88 A-5 (Werk. Nr. 2079) with both jets protruding through the aircraft body in dorsal/ventral configuration.

Although the firing trials conducted at Unterlüss test center were satisfactory the Luftwaffe technical office (Technisches Amt) cancelled the project objecting that the excessive weight of the gun would prevent the Junkers from escaping from the American escort fighters after attacking the bomber stream.

The weapon never went into service.

Düka 88 technical data

Caliber: 88-mm (10 rounds rotary magazine).

Lenght: 4.7 m.

Muzzle velocity: 605 m/sec.

Weight: 1,000 kg. Range: 12,000 m.



Following the cancellation of the air-to-air version, Rheinmetall decided to use the new technology in the Düka 280 project, an antiship cannons series with calibers ranging from 210 to 305-mm capable of firing 400 to 700 kg shells.

The possibility of using a Junkers Ju 288G bomber (provided with lateral openings for the exhaust gases in the fuselage sides) as a carrier aircraft was considered but the first tests showed the impossibility to absorb and deflect the rear blast in the airframe.

Calculations made for a 400 kg anti-ship shell fired at 560 m/sec from 2,000 m altitude indicated a 200-mm penetration capability at steel armour.



The Sondergerät SG 104 was a 355.6-mm recoilless cannon developed by WKW in 1939 to met the RLM specification calling for a airborne heavy cannon capable of engage armored naval targets.

The type was designed to fire a 635 kg shell at 315 m/sec, it was expected that the powerful recoil being balanced by the expulsion of the equally heavy cartridge case to the rear.

This 4,000 kg weapon was mounted under the belly of a Dornier Do 217 E-0, but the idea was abandoned due the damage caused by the explosive backblast during the first static test performed on September 9, 1940.



Sondergerät SG 104 technical data

Caliber: 355.6-mm (635 kg) single-shot recoilless weapon.

Lenght: 11.85 m.

Muzzle velocity: 280 m/sec.

Weight: 4,837 kg. Range: 4,000 m.
 

Attachments

  • b1.jpg
    b1.jpg
    465.9 KB · Views: 46
  • b2.jpg
    b2.jpg
    309.6 KB · Views: 40
  • b3.jpg
    b3.jpg
    220.4 KB · Views: 42
  • b4.jpg
    b4.jpg
    282.7 KB · Views: 42
  • b5.jpg
    b5.jpg
    290.1 KB · Views: 36
  • b6.jpg
    b6.jpg
    69.1 KB · Views: 38
  • b7.jpg
    b7.jpg
    140.7 KB · Views: 39
  • b8.jpg
    b8.jpg
    461.2 KB · Views: 40
  • b9.jpg
    b9.jpg
    453.3 KB · Views: 44
  • b10.jpg
    b10.jpg
    314.1 KB · Views: 44

Attachments

  • 59119-8cdafb79e4132bd439c53ed04c32b0bb.jpg
    59119-8cdafb79e4132bd439c53ed04c32b0bb.jpg
    642.4 KB · Views: 49
  • version A.jpeg
    version A.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 43
  • VERSION A (2).jpeg
    VERSION A (2).jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 41
  • version A (3).jpeg
    version A (3).jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 43
  • Justo-san's excellent contribution.jpg
    Justo-san's excellent contribution.jpg
    250.4 KB · Views: 53
Last edited:
Justo-san already posted this drawing.

The Ju 288 high-altitude bomber with BMW 801J or K.
This Ju 288 high-altitude bomber variant, powered by BMW 801J or K engines each of 1,480hp at take-off and 1,220hp at 12,000m, had correspondingly lower weights and performance than the Jumo 222-powered version but with a higher service ceiling. Compared to the Jumo 222-powered variant, equipped weight was 9,900kg, fuel 2,000kg, bombload 1,000kg and take-off weight 13,500kg. Maximum speed was 650km/h at cruising altitude 12,000m, range 1,800km at 615km/h and service ceiling 14,000m. wing-span and undercarriage track were the same as the Jumo 222-powered variant, except the drawing shows an overall length of 18.1125m.

The Ju 288 high-altitude bomber with Jumo 222.
This Ju 288 high-altitude bomber variant, powered by Jumon 222.
Wing span increase to 26m and fuselage length to 18.095m for the crew of four in the pressurised cabin.
Equipped weight was 11,000kg. With a payload consisting of 2,800kg of fuel and a 2,000kg bombload, take-off weight was 16,500kg. Maximum speed was 680km/h at 11,000m, range of 2,400km at cruising speed 590km/h and a service ceiling 13,000m.

Source : BLACK CROSS VOLUME 2 Junkers Ju 288/388/488, page 25,26.
 

Attachments

  • Höhenbomber Ju 288 .jpg
    Höhenbomber Ju 288 .jpg
    99 KB · Views: 61
Last edited:
A model of the EF-73 bomber project (?) in a wind tunnel in Dessau. The Ju 288 bomber was the first aircraft in the world, as part of the development of which a model equipped with anti-flutter weight compensators was manufactured and tested in a wind tunnel.


 

Attachments

  • Technologietrager_Ju_288-11.jpg
    Technologietrager_Ju_288-11.jpg
    108.5 KB · Views: 43
  • EF-73.jpg
    EF-73.jpg
    57.8 KB · Views: 36
Last edited:
This Ju288 proposal powered by the Jumo 223 existed only on the drawing board. Note the single fin and rudder, the whole aircraft resembling the EF73 project.

The Jumo 223 diesel engine of 2,500hp at take-off and combat power 1,650hp was foreseen as an alternative power plant to the Jumo 222E/F.

Maximum speed 650km/h at 6,000m
Cruising speed 580km/h at 6,000m
Range with 3,000kg bombload : 2,700km
Range with 1,500kg bombload : 3,800km
Range with 1,000kg bombload : 4,900km
Range with 500kg bombload : 5,400km
 

Attachments

  • Technologietrager_Ju_288-05.jpg
    Technologietrager_Ju_288-05.jpg
    51.2 KB · Views: 40
Last edited:
 

Attachments

  • junkers-jumo-223-front.jpg
    junkers-jumo-223-front.jpg
    361.4 KB · Views: 42

Attachments

  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (01)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (01)-960.jpg
    95.7 KB · Views: 36
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (02)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (02)-960.jpg
    127 KB · Views: 34
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (03)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (03)-960.jpg
    121.2 KB · Views: 31
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (04)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (04)-960.jpg
    103.3 KB · Views: 30
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (05)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (05)-960.jpg
    79.5 KB · Views: 31
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (06)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (06)-960.jpg
    107.3 KB · Views: 34
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (07)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (07)-960.jpg
    100.6 KB · Views: 36
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (08)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (08)-960.jpg
    105.8 KB · Views: 35
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (09)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (09)-960.jpg
    108 KB · Views: 35
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (10)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (10)-960.jpg
    115.5 KB · Views: 35
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (11)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (11)-960.jpg
    106.7 KB · Views: 30
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (12)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (12)-960.jpg
    113.2 KB · Views: 29
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (13)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (13)-960.jpg
    121.8 KB · Views: 32
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (14)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (14)-960.jpg
    101.2 KB · Views: 33
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (15)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (15)-960.jpg
    108.5 KB · Views: 33
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (16)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (16)-960.jpg
    77.5 KB · Views: 33
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (17)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (17)-960.jpg
    52.2 KB · Views: 34
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (17a)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (17a)-960.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 36
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (18)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (18)-960.jpg
    91.4 KB · Views: 33
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (19)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (19)-960.jpg
    87.3 KB · Views: 33
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (20)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (20)-960.jpg
    94.1 KB · Views: 38
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (21)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (21)-960.jpg
    102.6 KB · Views: 40
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (22)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (22)-960.jpg
    91.2 KB · Views: 41
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (23)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (23)-960.jpg
    89.7 KB · Views: 41
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (24)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (24)-960.jpg
    105.8 KB · Views: 37
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (25)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (25)-960.jpg
    104.1 KB · Views: 38
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (26)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (26)-960.jpg
    96.7 KB · Views: 38
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (27)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (27)-960.jpg
    98.1 KB · Views: 36
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (28)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (28)-960.jpg
    97.6 KB · Views: 38
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (29)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (29)-960.jpg
    96.8 KB · Views: 37
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (30)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (30)-960.jpg
    107.2 KB · Views: 38
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (31)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (31)-960.jpg
    80.1 KB · Views: 40
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (32)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (32)-960.jpg
    77.2 KB · Views: 38
  • 02 Junkers Ju288 (33)-960.jpg
    02 Junkers Ju288 (33)-960.jpg
    75.6 KB · Views: 58
Hi! V1.
 

Attachments

  • V1.jpg
    V1.jpg
    369.3 KB · Views: 32
  • V1 BMW801.jpg
    V1 BMW801.jpg
    169.4 KB · Views: 31
  • v1 (2).jpg
    v1 (2).jpg
    459.9 KB · Views: 38
  • v1 three side view.jpg
    v1 three side view.jpg
    98.3 KB · Views: 55
Hi! Version B armament.
 

Attachments

  • Version B armament position.jpg
    Version B armament position.jpg
    531.3 KB · Views: 54
  • 1×MG 131Z(2,000).jpg
    1×MG 131Z(2,000).jpg
    320.4 KB · Views: 47
  • 1×MG 151(700).jpg
    1×MG 151(700).jpg
    495.2 KB · Views: 46
  • Version B armament position color.jpg
    Version B armament position color.jpg
    666.4 KB · Views: 51
  • Version B periscope position.jpg
    Version B periscope position.jpg
    421.1 KB · Views: 53
  • upper periscope sight on the Ju 288V11(Version B).jpg
    upper periscope sight on the Ju 288V11(Version B).jpg
    920.7 KB · Views: 40
  • example of periscope.jpg
    example of periscope.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 48
Hi!
The aiming system of the remote control turret on the lower rear surface of the fuselage of the Ju 288 version A-1 was a method of aiming with a reflector sight, with a large view from the transparent bulges that overhung the left and right sides of the cabin, and a periscope was not used.

Version A-2 was aimed using periscopes mounted on the left and right sides of the cabin. The Ministry of Aeronautics' Technical Directorate decided to change the cabin to one that accommodates four crew, and the Ju 288B-1 with a larger cabin and new wings was planned, so the Version A project accommodate three crew was cancelled.
 

Attachments

  • Version A armament position color.jpg
    Version A armament position color.jpg
    679.3 KB · Views: 39
  • Version A another armament position color.jpg
    Version A another armament position color.jpg
    71.4 KB · Views: 40
  • Mark_III_free_gun_reflector_sight_mk_9_variant_reflex_sight_animation.gif
    Mark_III_free_gun_reflector_sight_mk_9_variant_reflex_sight_animation.gif
    549.4 KB · Views: 47
Last edited:
Hi! V6.
 

Attachments

  • Technologietrager_Ju_288-15.jpg
    Technologietrager_Ju_288-15.jpg
    105.7 KB · Views: 41
  • Technologietrager_Ju_288-16.jpg
    Technologietrager_Ju_288-16.jpg
    111 KB · Views: 42
  • Technologietrager_Ju_288-20.jpg
    Technologietrager_Ju_288-20.jpg
    64.3 KB · Views: 44
Version C has four remote-controlled turrets, which are operated by three crew members. What was the division of the turret control of each crew member?
 

Attachments

  • V103 pic1.jpg
    V103 pic1.jpg
    146.8 KB · Views: 32
  • V103 PIC3.jpg
    V103 PIC3.jpg
    333.3 KB · Views: 34
  • V103.jpg
    V103.jpg
    246.5 KB · Views: 31
  • 1×MG 131Z(2,000).jpg
    1×MG 131Z(2,000).jpg
    320.4 KB · Views: 36
Ju288 V101 was a version C prototype which added a fifth crew member as the tail gunner in the manned tail turret equipped with 4×MG 131s.(HL 131V quadruple mounting). This type of manned turret did not meet with RLM approval.

Attached drawing is Ju288 C-2 version with no ventral turret, but taiL turret seems to be a HL 131V.
 

Attachments

  • Tail-defensive-installation-Ju.-288V-101.jpg
    Tail-defensive-installation-Ju.-288V-101.jpg
    51.1 KB · Views: 44
  • C-2.jpg
    C-2.jpg
    53.9 KB · Views: 58
Last edited:

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom