Simple what-if question. As you know a rather laughable set of circumstances led to original plans to fit Iowas with the 16in/50 Mark 2 to be scrapped and they had to build new guns for it, the Mark 7, with the Mark 2s going to the perfectly useless role of coastal guns (did they even fired at anything during the war?). So let's assume the relevant design bureaus are a bit less incompetent/ communicate a bit better and the Iowas receive the Mark 2 as intended.
Now many point out to the industrial might of the US in WW2, but even them were not a bottomless pit of production. So in a scenario in which they DON'T have to build the Mark 7 guns, what else the freed industrial capacity can be used for?
Also, and this interests me greatly, how many Mark 7 guns were built? I can't find any figures for it. For the earlier 16in/45 Mark 6 NavWeaps says 120 were built, but this seems to be overkill for the 6 35,000 tons BBs built (54 guns), even assuming a healthy reserve pool required. Could it be that the production of Mark 6 and Mark 7 guns has for some reason been lumped together?
For the Mark 2, apparently 71 of them were complete, which seems plenty for the 4 or even all 6 Iowas.
Now many point out to the industrial might of the US in WW2, but even them were not a bottomless pit of production. So in a scenario in which they DON'T have to build the Mark 7 guns, what else the freed industrial capacity can be used for?
Also, and this interests me greatly, how many Mark 7 guns were built? I can't find any figures for it. For the earlier 16in/45 Mark 6 NavWeaps says 120 were built, but this seems to be overkill for the 6 35,000 tons BBs built (54 guns), even assuming a healthy reserve pool required. Could it be that the production of Mark 6 and Mark 7 guns has for some reason been lumped together?
For the Mark 2, apparently 71 of them were complete, which seems plenty for the 4 or even all 6 Iowas.